Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

COOP/WONCA Charts as a Screen for Mental Disorders in Primary Care

Joao Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques and Antonio Waldo Zuardi
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2011, 9 (4) 359-365; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1267
Joao Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Waldo Zuardi
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Functional Status is more than a marker of disease
    Chris van Weel
    Published on: 08 August 2011
  • No to the "COOP/WONCA Charts as a Screen for Mental Disorders in Primary Care."
    Evelyn M. van Weel-Baumgarten
    Published on: 05 August 2011
  • Published on: (8 August 2011)
    Page navigation anchor for Functional Status is more than a marker of disease
    Functional Status is more than a marker of disease
    • Chris van Weel, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    The study of the use of the COOP/WONCA charts in Brazilian primary care is exciting for a number of reasons. To appreciate this it is important, though, to look beyond the context of the actual study of screening for health problems, instruments and their value. The COOP/WONCA charts were designed for a user-friendly, comprehensive assessment of patients functioning. The concept behind ‘functional status’ and its measuri...

    Show More

    The study of the use of the COOP/WONCA charts in Brazilian primary care is exciting for a number of reasons. To appreciate this it is important, though, to look beyond the context of the actual study of screening for health problems, instruments and their value. The COOP/WONCA charts were designed for a user-friendly, comprehensive assessment of patients functioning. The concept behind ‘functional status’ and its measuring was that this would encapsulate essential characteristics of people [1, 2]: the ability to perform activities of everyday living. This would require physical, mental and social involvement. The ability to achieve this would add substantial information to the health status assessment in the traditional medical context, where the ‘diagnosis’ traditionally always took central stage. Yet, often, ‘self limiting’ acute illness will have limited impact on daily functioning. The same is true for the early phase of chronic diseases. Both self limiting acute, and low symptomatic chronic diseases comprise a substantial part of the morbidity pattern in the primary care population, and this may explain why the interest in generically measuring functional status has come from primary care.

    A first important observation from the study of Mazzoncini de Azevado- Marques and Waldo-Zuardi [3] is that the charts – and with it, the concepts of functional status – make sense in the Brazilian (primary) care setting. This is in line with earlier findings of the COOP/WONCA charts being robust in trans-cultural settings [2, 4], although there is evidence that social constraints in certain societies limited its application [5]. The study stresses the value of ‘functional status’ for the international community of primary care. A second important observation is that the authors found a clear relation between ‘depression’ and functional impairment. This is particularly relevant against the concerns of the rather loose and simplistic symptom- based depression diagnostic criteria [6]. It stresses that signs and symptoms, once they have an impact on patients’ daily functioning, pose a relevant case for primary care. Although this does not solve the question whether consequently screening for this condition is appropriate, it points into the direction of how diagnosis, case-finding and screening may be pursued, when appropriate: relating assessment of function to the assessment of symptoms. A third point is the conceptual frame that the charts offer. Mazzoncini de Azevado-Marques and Waldo-Zuardi [3] focus on abnormality: the correlation between impaired functioning and presence of signs and symptoms. The empirical data of COOP/WONCA assessment has been that often functional status is unimpaired in people with a state-of-the-art diagnosis. This, the ‘salutogenic’, as opposed to pathogenic approach to population health, presents in fact a paradigm change in health care. Recently, an international expert meeting proposed to re-define the concept of ‘health’ [7]. In the concept presented by that group, functional status plays an important role to distinguish between illness and disease, and health. It would be interesting to know how and where people with a DSM-compatible diagnosis of depression but unimpaired functioning, differed from those with substantial problems in their daily functioning. This reflects a true paradigm of primary care, that understanding health is as important for patient care as knowing all of diseases.

    References

    1. Nelson EC, Wassson J, Kirk J, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the coop charts method and preliminary findings. J Chron Dis 1987; 40 (Suppl 1):55S-64S.

    2. Weel, C. van, König Zahn, C., Touw Otten, F.W.M.M., Duijn, N.P. van, & Meyboom de Jong, B. (1995). COOP/WONCA Charts. Groningen: Noordelijke Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken, 1995. Also: http://www.globalfamilydoctor.com/research/research.asp#R4 (accessed 05 August 2011)

    3. Mazzoncini de Azevado-Marques J, Waldo-Zuardi A. COOP/WONCA Charts and Screen for Mental Disorders in Primary Care. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9: 359-365

    4. Lam, C.L.K., Weel, C. van, & Lauder, I.J. (1994). Can the Dartmouth COOP/WONCA Charts be Used to Assess the Functional Status of Chinese Patients?. Fam Pract, 11, 85 94.

    5. Scholten, J.H.G., van Weel, C. Functional Status Assessment in Family Practice. Lelystad: Medi¬Tekst, 1992. ISBN 90 5070 019 5.

    6. Practice guideline for major depressive disorder in adults. American Psychiatric Association. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:1-26.

    7. Huber M Knottnerus AJ, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, Leonard B, Lorig K, Loureiro MI, van der Meer JWM, Schnabel P, Smith R, van Weel C, Smid H. How should we define health? BMJ 2011;343:d4163

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (5 August 2011)
    Page navigation anchor for No to the "COOP/WONCA Charts as a Screen for Mental Disorders in Primary Care."
    No to the "COOP/WONCA Charts as a Screen for Mental Disorders in Primary Care."
    • Evelyn M. van Weel-Baumgarten, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Other Contributors:

    The interesting study by Azevedo-Marques and Zuardi shows that the COOP/WONCA Charts, developed for subjective evaluation of physical, emotional, and social well-being, are valid and feasible for screening for mental disorders by primary care teams. The psychometric characteristics of the charts, administered by trained community health workers and nurse assistants are good. Another important finding is that the Feelings...

    Show More

    The interesting study by Azevedo-Marques and Zuardi shows that the COOP/WONCA Charts, developed for subjective evaluation of physical, emotional, and social well-being, are valid and feasible for screening for mental disorders by primary care teams. The psychometric characteristics of the charts, administered by trained community health workers and nurse assistants are good. Another important finding is that the Feelings item has good validity in screening for depression and for mental disorders in general. This seems a particularly important feature in the charts when using them for mental health problems.

    Our problem is therefore not so much the instrument but the recommendation to use it for ‘screening’. The authors suggest another screening instrument but do not discuss the fact that screening for depression is not the path many primary care physicians believe they should take at the moment. Mitchell in his review, showed that general practitioners over diagnose more cases of depression than they miss [1]. Screening will increase these numbers even more. This worries us because there is no solid evidence that screening leads to more detection of clinically relevant depression and to better outcomes [2]. And many primary care patients with depressive symptoms who are detected through screening are at risk of receiving antidepressants because of the automatism of prescribing, once a 'diagnosis' is made. In our view this is not the best way of delivering person centered care in primary care and in the best interest of many persons with depressive symptoms, who might be in need of other and perhaps not even depression specific interventions [3,4].

    We therefore suggest using the charts for evaluation and follow-up of patients with depressive symptoms and depression, and perhaps for case finding but not for screening in general [5].

    1. Mitchell AJ, Vaze A, Rao S. Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2009; 374: 609-19.
    2. Baas KD, Wittkampf KA, van Weert HC, Lucassen P, Huyser J, van den Hoogen H, van de Lisdonk E, Bindels PE, Bockting CL, Ruhé HG, Schene AH. Screening for depression in high-risk groups: prospective cohort study in general practice. Br J Psychiatry. 2009 May;194(5):399-403.
    3. Lucassen P, van Rijswijk E, van Weel-Baumgarten E, Dowrick C. Making less depression diagnoses: beneficial for patients? Mental health in family Medicine, 2008;5:161-5.
    4. Weel-Baumgarten E. van, Lucassen P, Hassink-Franke L, Schers H. A different way of looking at depression Int J Clin Pract, October 2010, 64, 11, 1493-1495.
    5. Olde Hartman T, Ravesteijn H van, Lucassen P, Boven K van, Weel- Baumgarten E van, Weel C van. Patients have Reasons to Seek Medical Care - not just Health Problems. Why the 'reason for encounter' should be incorporated in the analysis of outcome of care. BJGP in press.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (4)
Vol. 9, Issue 4
1 Jul 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
COOP/WONCA Charts as a Screen for Mental Disorders in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
COOP/WONCA Charts as a Screen for Mental Disorders in Primary Care
Joao Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques, Antonio Waldo Zuardi
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2011, 9 (4) 359-365; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1267

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
COOP/WONCA Charts as a Screen for Mental Disorders in Primary Care
Joao Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques, Antonio Waldo Zuardi
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2011, 9 (4) 359-365; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1267
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In This Issue: Technology and Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study
  • Patient-Guided Tours: A Patient-Centered Methodology to Understand Patient Experiences of Health Care
  • Putting Evidence Into Practice: An Update on the US Preventive Services Task Force Methods for Developing Recommendations for Preventive Services
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Mental health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine