Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Impact of Insurance and Hospital Ownership on Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Ambulatory Care–Sensitive Conditions

Arch G. Mainous, Vanessa A. Diaz, Charles J. Everett and Michele E. Knoll
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2011, 9 (6) 489-495; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1315
Arch G. Mainous III
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mainouag@musc.edu
Vanessa A. Diaz
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles J. Everett
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele E. Knoll
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic Characteristics of the Sample

    CharacteristicTotalSelf-payMedicaidAll Other PaymentsP Value
    Unweighted, N849,86656,760181,285611,821
    Population estimate90,221,1736,663,87520,271,16463,286,134
    Insurance, %
     Self-pay7.4
     Medicaid22.5
     All other payments70.2
    Age in years, %
     18–4454.561.371.348.5<.01
     45–6445.538.728.751.5
    Sex, %
     Male36.149.825.038.3<.01
     Female63.950.275.061.7
    Race, %
     White56.553.048.859.4<.01
     Nonwhite18.822.726.316.0
     Not stated24.724.324.824.7
    Ambulatory care–sensitive conditions, %
     Yes12.717.611.812.5<.01
     No87.382.488.287.5
    Hospital ownership, %
     Proprietary13.38.915.213.1<.01
     Government12.724.217.310.0
     Nonprofit74.067.067.576.9
    Died in the hospital, %
     Yes1.01.31.01.0.06
     No99.098.799.099.0
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Unadjusted Length of Stay For Patients Aged 18 to 64 Years, by Principal Expected Source of Payment

    Mean Length of Stay, dP Valuea
    Hospital OwnershipSelf-payMedicaidAll Other PaymentsSelf-pay vs MedicaidSelf-pay vs All OtherMedicaid vs All Other
    ACSC
     All2.613.192.89<.01<.01<.01
     Proprietary hospital2.513.463.03<.01.03<.01
     Government hospital2.693.132.89<.01.01.05
     Nonprofit hospital2.583.192.89<.01<.01<.01
    Non-ACSC
     All2.742.942.89.02<.01.40
     Proprietary hospital2.562.743.19.03<.01<.01
     Government hospital2.943.002.94.77.99.75
     Nonprofit hospital2.723.002.83<.01<.01.04
    • ACSC=ambulatory care–sensitive condition.

    • ↵a P value based on difference in days.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Adjusted Length of Stay for Patients Aged 18 to 64 Years, by Principal Expected Source of Payment

    Mean Length of Stay, dP Valuea
    Hospital OwnershipSelf-payMedicaidAll Other PaymentsSelf-pay vs MedicaidSelf-pay vs All OtherMedicaid vs All Other
    ACSC
     All2.773.192.89<.01.04<.01
     Proprietary hospital2.643.493.03<.01.09<.01
     Government hospital2.833.062.83.03.90.06
     Nonprofit hospital2.773.162.86<.01.08<.01
    Non-ACSC
     All2.743.132.86<.01.01<.01
     Proprietary hospital2.643.033.19<.01<.01<.01
     Government hospital2.893.062.83.16.60.03
     Nonprofit hospital2.723.162.80<.01.03<.01
    • ACSC=ambulatory care–sensitive condition.

    • Note: Adjusted for age, sex, race, and Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index.

    • ↵a P value based on difference in days.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Adjusted Length of Stay For Patients Aged 18 to 64 Years, by Type of Hospital

    Mean Length of Stay, dP Valuea
    Hospital OwnershipProprietary HospitalGovernment HospitalNonprofit HospitalProprietary vs GovernmentProprietary vs NonprofitGovernment vs Nonprofit
    ACSC
     All3.102.892.92<.01.02.61
     Self-pay2.642.832.77.28.56.49
     Medicaid3.493.063.16.04.02.31
     All other payments3.032.832.86.01.03.59
    Non-ACSC
     All3.102.922.86.02<.01.04
     Self-pay2.642.892.72.01.28.03
     Medicaid3.033.063.16.61.16.35
     All other payments3.192.832.80<.01<.01.12
    • ACSC=ambulatory care–sensitive condition.

    • Note: Adjusted for age, sex, race, and Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index.

    • ↵a P value based on difference in days.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Adjusted Logistic Regressions for In-Hospital Mortality of Patients Aged 18 to 64 Years, by Principal Expected Source of Payment

    Hospital OwnershipSelf-pay OR (95% CI)Medicaid OR (95% CI)All Other Payments OR (95% CI)
    ACSC
     All1.00 (–)1.85 (0.82–4.19)1.31 (0.67–2.56)
     Proprietary hospitala1.00 (–)––
     Government hospitala1.00 (–)––
     Nonprofit hospital1.00 (–)1.01 (0.44–2.31)0.93 (0.47–1.83)
    Non-ACSC
     All1.00 (–)0.81 (0.67–0.98)0.58 (0.50–0.67)
     Proprietary hospital1.00 (–)0.68 (0.35–1.33)0.34 (0.21–0.54)
     Government hospital1.00 (–)0.81(0.60–1.11)0.83 (0.63–1.10)
     Nonprofit hospital1.00 (–)0.82 (0.65–1.04)0.59 (0.49–0.71)
    • ACSC=ambulatory care–sensitive condition; OR=odds ratio.

    • Note: Adjusted for age, sex, race, and Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index.

    • ↵a Too few deaths in self-pay group for reliable estimates for Medicaid and all other payments.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Impact of Insurance and Hospital Ownership on Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions

    Arch G. Mainous III, and colleagues

    Background Research has suggested that for-profit US hospitals maximize financial margins from patient care by limiting therapies or decreasing length of stay for uninsured patients. This study examines whether lack of health insurance is related to length of stay and risk of mortality in for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals. The study examines hospitalizations for both Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs, conditions in which hospitalizations may be avoidable with preventive care and early disease management in the outpatient setting) and non-ACSCs.

    What This Study Found Patients without insurance have significantly shorter hospital stays, regardless of whether they are hospitalized for an ACSC or non-ACSC. Across all hospital types, the average length of stay for ACSCs was 2.77 days for uninsured individuals, 2.89 days for those with private insurance, and 3.19 days for those with Medicaid. Patients without insurance have a higher likelihood of death for non-ACSCs, but not for ACSCs.

    Implications

    • The authors call on clinicians to advocate for equal treatment of patients, regardless of insurance or payment status.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (6)
Vol. 9, Issue 6
November/December 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Insurance and Hospital Ownership on Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Ambulatory Care–Sensitive Conditions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of Insurance and Hospital Ownership on Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Ambulatory Care–Sensitive Conditions
Arch G. Mainous, Vanessa A. Diaz, Charles J. Everett, Michele E. Knoll
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2011, 9 (6) 489-495; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1315

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Impact of Insurance and Hospital Ownership on Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Ambulatory Care–Sensitive Conditions
Arch G. Mainous, Vanessa A. Diaz, Charles J. Everett, Michele E. Knoll
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2011, 9 (6) 489-495; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1315
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Trends in medical and surgical admission length of stay by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status: a time series analysis
  • Methodological Considerations for Research With Black Male Victims of Violent Injury in an Urban Trauma Unit
  • Insurance status, inhospital mortality and length of stay in hospitalised patients in Shanxi, China: a cross-sectional study
  • In This Issue: Health Care Policy Affects the Lives of Real People
  • Where the United States Falls Down and How We Might Stand Up
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
  • Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access
    • Personalized care
  • Other topics:
    • Disparities in health and health care

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine