Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
  • Log out
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsDepartmentsF

Toward a Unified and Collaborative Future: Creating a Strategic Plan for Family Medicine Research

Irfan Asif, Amanda Weidner and Samantha Elwood; on behalf of the ADFM and NAPCRG planning teams
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2023, 21 (3) 289-291; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2987
Irfan Asif
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Weidner
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha Elwood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Context

Family medicine has been grappling with its role as an academic discipline since its founding.1 At its roots, the family medicine specialty was founded as a counterculture movement to bring medicine back into the community. As a discipline that prides itself on using the best evidence, family medicine must support the concept of being “a clinical discipline with academic rigor that includes research as a key intellectual underpinning.”2 Despite progress in growing research capacity3 measured as extramural funding4-6 (NIH funding has increased from $59M in 20167 to $103M in 20218—great news!), or outputs such as publications,9 the total NIH funding to the entire discipline in 2021 was only twice the mean funding to one department of internal medicine, leaving room for growth.8

ADFM and NAPCRG are leading a process to develop a roadmap and strategic plan with action steps and metrics to move research in the discipline forward by 2030. The plan encompasses the whole spectrum of research,10 from those who engage in critical appraisal of evidence to career researchers. Family physicians are engaged in all stages of research with particular emphasis on patients, populations, and communities.

Why Now?

The idea for strengthening research in family medicine is not new. In 2002, for example, a group of leaders generated a series of recommendations for building research capacity.11 However, the environment is ripe for taking on this effort now for 3 key reasons.

First, progress is slow. Despite the growth in funding in the past 5 years noted above, the 10+ years before that were nearly stagnant, and we are seeing some other concerning trends. Many departments with research fellowships have reported challenges in finding interested family physician candidates, and pilot programs like the physician scientist pathway12 have struggled to take off.

Second, we have some exceptional partners and thought leaders both within and outside family medicine in the United States. We have excellent and growing programs and opportunities, such as the Building Research Capacity initiative’s fellowship and consultation services,13 the CAFM Educational Research Alliance infrastructure,14 the Family Medicine Discovers Rapid Cycle Scientific Discovery and Innovation program,15 NAPCRG’s Patient and Clinician Engagement Committee,16 the PRIME registry,17 new funding for building artificial intelligence and machine learning research,18 many PBRNs, numerous fellowships and visiting scholars programs, and robust journals. We have opportunities to learn from our colleagues in other countries, like Canada with their TUTOR-PHC program19 and the Netherlands with their primary care PhD-during-residency program,20 and we have partners in other specialties, like emergency medicine, who are growing their research discipline-wide in creative ways with their own strategic plan21 from whom we can learn.

Finally, we are in an opportune moment to push together as a discipline, with high energy for research among the current leadership across the family medicine organizations and a unique opportunity with ADFM and NAPCRG cohosting the twice-annual meetings of the 8 major family medicine organization’s elected and executive leadership (the Family Medicine Leadership Consortium [FMLC]) this year. We are particularly grateful to the ABFM Foundation for supporting this work.

Outlining the Process

The effort to create an action-oriented discipline-wide research agenda began in early 2020, with 10 key themes identified: (1) Research foci; (2) Infrastructure; (3) Advocacy; (4) Funding; (5) Pathways; (6) Mentorship; (7) Chair & Faculty development; (8) Partnerships; (9) Data; and (10) Communication. In fall of 2022, funding was received from the ABFM Foundation for a yearlong process culminating in a research summit in October 2023 in conjunction with the NAPCRG Annual Meeting.

In February, we convened the 8 national family medicine organizations as part of the FMLC to establish the process and vision, clarify the timeline, review the intended final product, and evaluate the current state of research efforts. We also featured “innovative inspirations” speakers who presented possibilities and participated in visioning exercises with consultants. The input gathered from these discussions will inform the data analysis and guide the development of potential strategies and next steps.

While planning for this FMLC kickoff, we started the process of capturing as many voices as possible for input via a visioning survey and have engaged a consulting group, Clarus Consulting, to assist with constituent interviews and focus groups for deeper input across a breadth of audiences. These data will be synthesized into themes to drive the strategic planning process. In parallel to this process, we are planning to generate a “special issue” of a journal with articles highlighting the needs and opportunities in each of our key themes.

After the FMLC organizations have reviewed the draft strategic plan in August 2023, it will be used to drive the Research Summit in October. This will include structured groupthink on action planning, measures, and advocacy to move the plan forward. Success will be measured by becoming unified as a discipline on the role of each family medicine organization in research, developing infrastructure and a broad strategic communication plan for research, and making headway in our efforts for an NIH Center for Primary Care.

A Collaborative Approach

In conclusion, we are excited about the potential of this initiative to transform research in family medicine. By bringing together key constituents from across the discipline, we can identify areas of shared interest and work collaboratively to achieve our goals. We look forward to working with all the participating organizations and individuals to develop a strategic plan that will guide our efforts over the coming years, and we are confident that, by working together, we can advance the field of family medicine research and improve health outcomes for patients and communities across the country.

Acknowledgments

A huge thank you to the ABFM Foundation for supporting this work; Warren Newton, the ADFM and NAPCRG Executive teams for their ongoing engagement and feedback into this process so far; the ADFM Research Development Committee for the many thoughtful conversations leading up to this process; and everyone else who has shared their time and wisdom with us!!

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Stephens GG.
    The intellectual basis of family practice. J Fam Pract. 1975; 2(6): 423-428.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bowman MA,
    2. Lucan SC,
    3. Rosenthal TC,
    4. Mainous AG III.,
    5. James PA.
    Family medicine research in the United States from the late 1960s into the future. Fam Med. 2017; 49(4): 289-295.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Weidner A,
    2. Peterson LE,
    3. Mainous AG III.,
    4. Datta A,
    5. Ewigman B.
    The current state of research capacity in US family medicine departments. Fam Med. 2019; 51(2): 112-119. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2019.180310
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lucan SC,
    2. Phillips RL Jr.,
    3. Bazemore AW.
    Off the roadmap? Family medicine’s grant funding and committee representation at NIH. Ann Fam Med. 2008; 6(6): 534-542. doi:10.1370/afm.911
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.
    1. Cameron BJ,
    2. Bazemore AW,
    3. Morley CP.
    Lost in translation: NIH funding for family medicine research remains limited. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016; 29(5): 528-530. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.160063
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jang DH,
    2. Levy PD,
    3. Shofer FS,
    4. Sun B,
    5. Brown J.
    A comparative analysis of National Institutes of Health research support for emergency medicine - 2008 to 2017. Am J Emerg Med. 2019; 37(10): 1850-1854. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.045
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research Rankings of NIH Funding
    (2016). Accessed Mar 22, 2023. https://brimr.org/brimr-rankings-of-nih-funding-in-2016/
  8. 8.↵
    1. Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research Rankings of NIH Funding
    (2021). Accessed Mar 22, 2023. https://brimr.org/brimr-rankings-of-nih-funding-in-2021/
  9. 9.↵
    1. Liaw W,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Jiang V, et al.
    The scholarly output of faculty in family medicine departments. Fam Med. 2019; 51(2): 103-111. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2019.536135
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pimlott N,
    2. Katz A.
    Ecology of family physicians’ research engagement. Can Fam Physician. 2016; 62(5): 385-390.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. North American Primary Care Research Group Committee on Building Research Capacity; Academic Family Medicine Organizations Research Subcommittee
    . What does it mean to build research capacity? Fam Med. 2002; 34(9): 678-684.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Doubeni CA,
    2. Davis A,
    3. Benson JL,
    4. Ewigman B.
    A physician scientist pathway in family medicine residency training programs. Ann Fam Med. 2017; 15(6): 589-590. doi:10.1370/afm.2160
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Association of Departments of Family Medicine and NAPCRG
    . Building Research Capacity Initiative. Accessed Mar 23, 2023. https://adfm.org/programs/building-research-capacity-brc/
  14. 14.↵
    1. Society of Teachers of Family Medicine
    . CAFM Educational Research Alliance. Accessed Mar 23, 2023 https://www.stfm.org/publicationsresearch/cera/cera/
  15. 15.↵
    1. American Academy of Family Physicians
    . Family Medicine Discovers Rapid Cycle Scientific Discovery and Innovation (FMD RapSDI). Accessed Mar 23, 2023. https://www.aafp.org/family-physician/patient-care/nrn/studies/all/family_medicine_discovers.html
  16. 16.↵
    1. NAPCRG
    . Patient and Clinician Engagement (PaCE) Committee. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.napcrg.org/programs/engagement-pace/patient-and-clinician-engagement-pace-program/
  17. 17.↵
    1. The Center for Professionalism & Value in Health Care
    . The PRIME Registry. Accessed Mar 22, 2023. https://professionalismandvalue.org/laboratory/#prime_registry
  18. 18.↵
    1. The Center for Professionalism & Value in Health Care
    . Advancing Family Medicine through Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning. Accessed Mar 22, 2023. https://professionalismandvalue.org/advancing-family-medicine-through-artificial-intelligence-machine-learning/
  19. 19.↵
    1. Terry AL,
    2. Brown JB,
    3. Van Hoorn R,
    4. Stewart M; TUTOR-PHC Program Co-Investigators
    . Evolution and 15-year effect of a pan-Canadian training program: transdisciplinary understanding and training on research-primary health care. Can Fam Physician. 2018; 64(6): 475-476.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Olde Hartman TC,
    2. Poels PJ,
    3. Licht-Strunk E,
    4. van Weel C.
    Combining vocational and research training. Aust Fam Physician. 2008; 37(6): 486-488.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Neumar RW,
    2. Blomkalns AL,
    3. Cairns CB, et al.
    Emergency medicine research: 2030 strategic goals. Acad Emerg Med. 2022; 29(2): 241-251. doi:10.1111/acem.14367
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (3)
Vol. 21, Issue 3
May/June 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Toward a Unified and Collaborative Future: Creating a Strategic Plan for Family Medicine Research
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Toward a Unified and Collaborative Future: Creating a Strategic Plan for Family Medicine Research
Irfan Asif, Amanda Weidner, Samantha Elwood
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2023, 21 (3) 289-291; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2987

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Toward a Unified and Collaborative Future: Creating a Strategic Plan for Family Medicine Research
Irfan Asif, Amanda Weidner, Samantha Elwood
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2023, 21 (3) 289-291; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2987
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Context
    • Why Now?
    • Outlining the Process
    • A Collaborative Approach
    • Acknowledgments
    • REFERENCES
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Leveraging the Clinical Translational Science Award Network to Advance Family Medicine Research
  • Transforming Family Medicine Research: Strategic Planning, Summits, and a Special Issue
  • Putting Trainees at the Center of the Family Medicine Research Workforce of Tomorrow
  • Shaping the Future of Family Medicine Research: The 2023 National Family Medicine Research Summit
  • A Milestone for Promoting Research in Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Departments

  • What do Primary Care Patients Want?
  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
  • Addressing Research Pathway Gaps: Insights from a Needs Assessment at the AAFP Future Conference
Show more Departments

Family Medicine Updates

  • What do Primary Care Patients Want?
  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
  • Addressing Research Pathway Gaps: Insights from a Needs Assessment at the AAFP Future Conference
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine