Skip to main content
Positive Review Points:
1.The article addresses a crucial and contemporary issue – the impact of the rapid shift to virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic on family physicians' workplace motivation. This relevance adds value to the existing literature and contributes to understanding the evolving landscape of healthcare.
2. The use of self-determination theory provides a solid theoretical foundation for the study, offering a lens to examine family physicians' motivation towards virtual care. This theoretical approach enhances the depth of the analysis and facilitates a more nuanced understanding of the relationships explored.
3. The conclusions drawn from the study offer actionable insights for optimizing the integration of virtual care into standard practice and supporting family physician well-being. The emphasis on the role of basic psychological needs in mediating the relationship between motivation and well-being provides practical considerations for healthcare organizations.
Negative Review Points
1. The study focuses specifically on family physicians in Alberta, Canada, which may limit the generalizability of its findings to a broader population. Consideration of regional variations, healthcare system structures, and cultural differences could strengthen the external validity of the study.
2 While the use of quantitative data and analyses is valuable, a more in-depth exploration of qualitative aspects, such as family physicians' experiences and perceptions of virtual care, could enrich the study. A mixed-methods approach might provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.
3. The conclusions seem to dichotomize motivation into autonomous and controlled, which may oversimplify the complex nature of physician motivation. A more nuanced exploration of the multifaceted factors influencing motivation could enhance the depth of the study's insights.