Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleEducation and training

Differences between Residents by How They Matched into Family Medicine: Does SOAP make a difference?

Wendy Barr, Lars Peterson and Sarah Fleischer
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6605; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6605
Wendy Barr
MD, FAAFP, MPH, MSCE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Peterson
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Fleischer
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: In the US, medical students enter residency through The Match. Those who don’t initially match in the “Main Match” can still match via the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP) or can sign directly with residencies after the Match is completed. For many who didn’t initially match, family medicine (FM) may not have been their first choice. It is unclear what differences exist by how residents enter residency.

Objective: Compare the demographics and early residency outcomes of residents by pathway into residency.

Study Design and Analysis: Survey of US PGY1 FM residents. Bivariate and logistic regression.

Setting or Dataset: 2023 American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) National Resident Survey (NRS) administered in October 2023 at the end of the ABFM In-Training Exam (ITE) merged with ABFM administrative data.

Population Studied: PGY1 US FM residents.

Intervention/Instrument: The NRS surveyed all FM residents who completed the ITE. PGY1 residents were asked about their pathway into residency along with other measures of satisfaction.

Outcome Measures: ITE score, self-reported satisfaction with professions of medicine, specialty of FM, residency training, and 2 item burnout screening measure.

Results: 2852 PGY1 residents who completed the NRS (response rate: 55.5%). Overall, 10.4% reported matching to their program after the “Main Match.”. Those in this group were more likely to be older (55.4% vs. 38.2% >=30 years), male (55.6% vs. 44.4%), have an MD degree (76.0% vs. 64.2%), and be an international medical graduate (40.9% vs. 31.2%). Residents who matched after the “Main Match” reported lower satisfaction with the profession of medicine (73.1% vs. 80.8%), and FM as a specialty (74.5% vs. 89.8%), and lower ITE scores (329 vs. 353). There were no differences in percent who self-identify as Underrepresented in Medicine, training satisfaction, or burnout by residency pathway. In regression analyses controlling for demographics, entering residency after the “Main Match” remained associated with decreased satisfaction with FM as a specialty and lower ITE scores.

Conclusions: There are differences in resident professional satisfaction and medical knowledge between residents who enter FM residency through SOAP or after the Match compared to those that enter through the Main Match. Whether these residents will acculturate to family medicine is unknown.

  • © 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 22, Issue Supplement 1
20 Nov 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differences between Residents by How They Matched into Family Medicine: Does SOAP make a difference?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Differences between Residents by How They Matched into Family Medicine: Does SOAP make a difference?
Wendy Barr, Lars Peterson, Sarah Fleischer
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6605; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6605

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Differences between Residents by How They Matched into Family Medicine: Does SOAP make a difference?
Wendy Barr, Lars Peterson, Sarah Fleischer
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6605; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6605
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Impact of a Longitudinal Clerkship Lecture on Medical Students’ Knowledge and Response to Human Trafficking
  • Evaluating the Impact of Structured Sleep Medicine Lecture Series in Family Medicine Residents
  • Improving Scholarship in a Community Hospital Residency Program with a Curriculum featuring a Structured Roadmap, Indi
Show more Education and training

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine