Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Flow of the Study.
- Figure 2.
Changes in Subjects’ Knowledge about Prostate Cancer Screening. Differences are significant at P < .001, from repeated measures ANOVA.
Tables
Intervention Group (n = 70) Control Group (n = 67) * Percentages do not sum to 100% because of rounding. Age Mean 58.9 59.7 Standard Deviation 7.38 7.75 Minimum, Maximum 46, 70 45, 70 Education Not a high school graduate 13 (18.6%) 17 (25.5%) High school graduate 11 (15.7%) 15 (22.4%) Some college training 27 (38.6%) 16 (23.9%) College graduate 19 (27.1%) 19 (28.4%) Ethnicity African American 16 (22.9%) 8 (11.9%) white 46 (65.7%) 44 (65.7%) Mexican American 6 (8.6%) 12 (17.9%) Other 2 (2.9%) 3 (4.5%) Annual Household Income Less than $10,000 10 (14.3%) 14 (20.9%) $10,000 to $19,999 13 (18.6%) 16 (23.9%) $20,000 to $39,999 20 (28.6%) 14 (20.9%) $40,000 to $69,999 20 (28.6%) 16 (23.9%) $70,000 and greater 7 (10.0%) 7 (10.4%) Family History of Prostate Cancer 11 (15.7%) 8 (11.9%) Intervention Group (n = 70) Control Group (n = 67) n % n % P value DRE: digital rectal examination. PSA: prostate-specific antigen. General Physical Examination 59 72.9 59 76.1 .89 DRE 26 37.1 26 38.8 .84 PSA test 24 34.3 37 55.2 .01 - Table 3.
Relationship Between Intention to Be Screened as Reported at the 2-week Follow-Up and Reported PSA Testing at the 1-Year Follow-up
Intentions Intervention group* Control group PSA: prostate-specific antigen. *Two-week follow-up data for 1 patient in the intervention group is missing. Intended to have PSA test 40 57 Reported being tested at 1-year follow-up 21 (52.5%) 33 (57.9%) Intended to not have PSA test 12 0 Reported being tested at 1-year follow-up 1 (8.3%) 0 Was unsure about PSA testing 17 10 Reported being tested at 1-year follow-up 2 (11.8%) 4 (40.0%)
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Recent Patterns in Shared Decision Making for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing in the United States
- National Evidence on the Use of Shared Decision Making in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
- A Randomized Trial of a Computer-Tailored Decision Aid to Improve Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Results from the Take the Wheel Trial
- Are Cancer-Related Decision Aids Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Perceived Ambiguity about Screening Mammography Recommendations: Association with Future Mammography Uptake and Perceptions
- Educating African American Men about the Prostate Cancer Screening Dilemma: A Randomized Intervention.
- The First 20 Days
- Welcome to the Annals of Family Medicine