Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Articles

Screening Mammography and Pap Tests Among Older American Women 1996–2000: Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD)

Truls Østbye, Gary N. Greenberg, Donald H. Taylor and Ann Marie M. Lee
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2003, 1 (4) 209-217; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.54
Truls Østbye
MD, MPH, MBA, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary N. Greenberg
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald H. Taylor Jr
MPA, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann Marie M. Lee
MPH, CHES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Mammography: proportion (weighted) reported screening in the last 2 years, by age-group and year.

  •   Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Cervical cancer: proportion (weighted) reported screening in the last 2 years, by age-group and year.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Receipt of Preventive Services by Survey Wave in Selected Subgroups (Weighted Percentages)

    HRSAHEAD
    Pap TestMammogramPap TestMammogram
    Variables1996n=4,3702000n=4,8541996n=4,3702000n=4,8541995n=3,8182000n=3,0401995n=3,8182000n=3,040
    Pap = Papanicolaou; HRS = Health and Retirement Study; AHEAD = Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old.
    * Income categories: HRS – 1996: 1, ≤ $13,000; 2, $13,001-$31,600; 3, $31,601-$58,269; 4, > $58,269. 2000: 1, ≤ $8,295; 2, $8,296-$20,420; 3, $20,421-$49,504; 4, >$49,504. AHEAD – 1995: 1, ≤ $10,560; 2, $10,561-$18,000; 3, $18,001-$30,000; 4, > $30,000. 2000: 1, ≤ $8,400; 2, $8,401-$12,000; 3, $12,001-$18,840; 4, > $18,840.
    † Subjective life expectation: HRS: “(What is the percent chance) that you will live to be 75 or more?” AHEAD: “(Using a number from 0 to 100) what do you think are the chances that you will live another 5 years?”
    Demographic
    Age, years
        50–5474747279––––
        55–5969737276––––
        60–6463707178––––
        70–74––––54576577
        75–79––––44475965
        80–84––––31364354
        85–89––––23253742
    White6870727742435462
    Black6870737847445758
    Socioeconomic
    Completed high school7172768046486168
    Not completed high school5760606935354449
    Born in the United States6870727742445462
    Born abroad7068717738435061
    Married7173758149526471
    Not married6163647038384856
    Income category*
        15865597335344449
        26564697342415458
        37069767744475867
        48080858750516371
    Health
    Smokers5758606441365152
    Non smokers7172758142445462
    Less physical activity–66–75–40–58
    Vigorous exercise–74–80–52–70
    Health excellent, very good, good7072737945465664
    Health poor or fair6063667236385057
    Cognitively normal––––44445764
    Cognitively impaired––––34404048
    Subjective life expectation†
        0%–33%6164657337364854
        34%–66%6469707748496368
        67%–100%7374758149506067
    Health care
    Uninsured46494452––––
    Insured71717580––––
    No additional private insurance––––37434562
    Additional private insurance––––43615774
    Not in hospital last year6870717743445462
    Hospitalized in the last year6466737839425361
    0–2 physician visits last year5957596341335047
    3–5 physician visits last year7375788244445662
    6+ physician visits last year7274788242465766
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Adjusted Relative Odds of Receipt of Cancer Screening Services: Health and Retirement Study (HRS) Multivariate Models

    VariablesPap TestFull ModelOR (95% CI)(n = 10,146)*MammogramFull ModelOR (95% CI)(n = 10,156)*
    Pap = Papanicolaou; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
    * Number of observations in model. Most women contributed 2 observations: 1996 and 2000. A total of 5,942 answered at least 1 survey question once.
    † Reference categories: year = 1996; age = 50–54.9 years; race = white.
    ‡ Reference categories: education = not completed high school; birth place = born abroad; marital status = not married; income = category 4 (see footnote to Table 1).
    § Reference categories: smoking status = not smoking; exercise = less physical activity; health = excellent, very good, or good; subjective life expectations = 0%–33% (see footnote to Table 1).
    || Reference categories: health insurance = some health insurance; hospitalization in last year = not in hospital last year; physician visits in last year = 0–2 visits in last year.
    Demographic‡
    Year 20000.96 (0.88–1.05)1.22 (1.11–1.35)
    Age 55–59.9 years0.97 (0.87–1.08)1.17 (1.04–1.31)
    Age 60–64.9 years0.87 (0.78–0.97)1.18 (1.05–1.33)
    Black1.38 (1.22–1.56)1.37 (1.20–1.57)
    Socioeconomic‡
    Completed high school1.25 (1.13–1.40)1.26 (1.12–1.41)
    Born in the United States0.86 (0.74–1.00)0.80 (0.68–0.94)
    Married1.22 (1.10–1.35)1.30 (1.17–1.45)
    Income category 10.63 (0.55–0.73)0.55 (0.47–0.65)
    Income category 20.60 (0.52–0.68)0.58 (0.50–0.67)
    Income category 30.69 (0.60–0.79)0.64 (0.55–0.74)
    Health§
    Smoking0.70 (0.63–0.77)0.58 (0.52–0.65)
    Vigorous exercise1.25 (1.14–1.37)1.12 (1.01–1.23)
    Poor or fair health0.77 (0.69–0.87)0.80 (0.70–0.91)
    Subjective life expectation 34%–66%1.03 (0.91–1.16)1.03 (0.90–1.17)
    Subjective life expectation 67%–100%1.28 (1.14–1.44)1.15 (1.01–1.23)
    Health care||
    Uninsured0.53 (0.46–0.61)0.38 (0.34–0.44)
    In hospital in last year0.88 (0.78–1.00)0.98 (0.85–1.13)
    3–5 physician visits in last year1.90 (1.68–2.13)2.15 (1.90–2.43)
    6+ physician visits in last year*2.11 (1.89–2.36)2.54 (2.26–2.86)
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Adjusted Relative Odds of Receipt of Cancer Screening Services: Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHDEAD) Multivariate Models

    VariablesPap TestFull ModelOR (95% CI)(n = 6,330)*MammogramFull ModelOR (95% CI)(n = 6,347)*
    Pap = Papanicolaou; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
    * Number of observations in model – most women contributed 2 observations: 1995 and 2000. A total of 4,543 women answered at least 1 survey question once.
    † Reference categories: year = 1995; age = 70–74.9 years; race = white.
    ‡ Reference categories: education = not completed high school; birth place = born abroad; marital status = not married; income = category 4 (see footnote to Table 1).
    § Reference categories: smoking status = not smoking; exercise = less physical activity; health = excellent–very good–or good; mental status = cognitively normal; subjective life expectation = 0%–33% (see footnote to Table 1).
    || Reference categories: health insurance = no other private insurance; hospitalization in last year = not in hospital last year; physician visits in last year = 0–2 physicians in last year.
    Demographic †
    Year 20000.91 (0.76–1.09)1.11 (0.93–1.33)
    Age 75–79.9 years0.84 (0.74–0.96)0.93 (0.81–1.06)
    Age 80–84.9 years0.54 (0.46–0.63)0.61 (0.52–0.71)
    Age 85–89.9 years0.41 (0.33–0.51)0.46 (0.37–0.56)
    Black1.58 (1.34–1.87)1.57 (1.40–1.78)
    Socioeconomic ‡
    Completed high school1.37 (1.22–1.55)1.58 (1.40–1.78)
    Born in the United States0.83 (0.69–1.01)0.67 (0.55–0.81)
    Married1.32 (1.17–1.48)1.30 (1.15–1.47)
    Income category 10.77 (0.65–0.90)0.64 (0.54–0.75)
    Income category 20.82 (0.70–0.95)0.74 (0.63–0.87)
    Income category 30.88 (0.76–1.02)0.91 (0.78–1.07)
    Health §
    Smoking0.77 (0.64–0.94)0.74 (0.61–0.90)
    Vigorous exercise1.36 (1.21–1.53)1.32 (1.16–1.49)
    Poor or fair health0.79 (0.70–0.89)0.91 (0.80–1.03)
    Cognitive impairment0.97 (0.79–1.18)0.73 (0.60–0.88)
    Subjective life expectation 34%–66%1.11 (0.98–1.27)1.26 (1.11–1.44)
    Subjective life expectation 67%–100%1.13 (0.99–1.28)1.10 (0.97–1.27)
    Health care ||
    Additional private insurance1.20 (1.01–1.44)1.31 (1.10–1.57)
    In hospital in last year1.00 (0.88–1.14)0.97 (0.85–1.10)
    3–5 physician visits in the last year1.43 (1.24–1.65)1.63 (1.41–1.88)
    6+ physician visits in the last year1.61 (1.39–1.85)2.01 (1.74–2.32)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 1 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 1 (4)
Vol. 1, Issue 4
1 Nov 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • [Annual Indexes, 2003]
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Screening Mammography and Pap Tests Among Older American Women 1996–2000: Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Screening Mammography and Pap Tests Among Older American Women 1996–2000: Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD)
Truls Østbye, Gary N. Greenberg, Donald H. Taylor, Ann Marie M. Lee
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2003, 1 (4) 209-217; DOI: 10.1370/afm.54

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Screening Mammography and Pap Tests Among Older American Women 1996–2000: Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD)
Truls Østbye, Gary N. Greenberg, Donald H. Taylor, Ann Marie M. Lee
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2003, 1 (4) 209-217; DOI: 10.1370/afm.54
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Increasing Efforts to Reduce Cervical Cancer through State-Level Comprehensive Cancer Control Planning
  • Reversals of Association for Pap, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Testing among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black Women and Men
  • The Break-Even Point: When Medical Advances Are Less Important Than Improving the Fidelity With Which They Are Delivered
  • Provocative Questions
  • In This Issue: Cervical Cancer Screening
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Facilitators of Transforming Primary Care: A Look Under the Hood at Practice Leadership
  • Medical Home Transformation: A Gradual Process and a Continuum of Attainment
  • Assessment and Measurement of Patient-Centered Medical Home Implementation: The BCBSM Experience
Show more Original Articles

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
    • Women's health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine