Research ArticleMethodology

Envisioning a Learning Health Care System: The Electronic Primary Care Research Network, A Case Study

Brendan C. Delaney, Kevin A. Peterson, Stuart Speedie, Adel Taweel, Theodoros N. Arvanitis and F. D. Richard Hobbs
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2012, 10 (1) 54-59; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1313

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    The learning health care system.

    RCT = randomized controlled trial.

  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    The electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN).

    eCRF = electronic case report form.

    Note: The ePCRN system functions in a modular fashion. A researcher is able to create a standardized computable representation of their study eligibility criteria using a Web-based workbench and a terminology service. With permission from the network, the system creates a search tailored for the target clinical data, referred to as a gateway. The gateway can be a copy of a single health record system or an aggregate data repository. It holds records that are potentially identifiable, however, either directly or via pseudoanonymization. The search reports counts of eligible subjects to the researcher, and then tags the identified subjects for local recruitment by practice staff.

Tables

  • Table 1

    Lessons Learned From the ePCRN (Electronic Primary Care Research Network) Project

    ProblemPotential Solution
    Extracting coded data from an EHR loses information and may introduce inaccuracies, as different EHR systems do not record some clinical data items consistently, eg, blood pressure. Inaccuracies usually arise where the main terminology adopted within the EHR is a disease-based classification, such as ICD, that only partially meets the system’s requirement for clinical terminologyPromote the uptake of standard clinical concept representations, such as archetypes based on the CEN/ISO 13606 standard or HL7 detailed clinical models. Rather than a simple term, a more detailed description of the clinical context and value of the clinical data are maintained
    Data extraction standards based on a snapshot transfer of EHR data on a given date (such as CCD/CCR) can be unwieldy when data needs to be extracted on a repeated basis, and bulk export facilities are rarely provided by EHR vendorsPromote mandatory adoption of HL7 information exchange standards as an international standard for the exchange of data between and with EHR systems. Include the necessary terminology services to map between different vocabulary systems where necessary
    Clinicians and health care providers are rarely incentivized to maintain good data quality on the basis of research use aloneProvide good clinical reasons for data quality and detailed record keeping, such as audit or decision support
    Legal and ethical constraints in many countries limit linkage of data and its use for research without consentPromote international consensus as to how and when data can be linked without consent, and develop systems for managing consent to extraction or study participation across systems. Include adoption of privacy-enhancing technologies, such as filters and third-party linkage systems
    Researchers largely unaware of potential benefits offered by electronic systems to support research, and do not therefore create demand for wider deploymentConduct well-publicized pilot deployments and evaluations

    • CCD = continuity of care document ; CCR = Continuity of Care Record; CEN = European Committee for Standardization; EHR = electronic health record; HL7 = Health Level Seven International; ICD = International Classification of Diseases; ISO = International Organization for Standardization.

  • Table 2

    Steps That May Support a Learning Health Care System

    Knowledge translation
    Develop meaningful use of the EHR to support diagnostic and therapeutic support based on evidence
    Develop a computable representation of research evidence and make that available to EHR systems as a Web service
    Develop a means of providing diagnostic or therapeutic prompts within an EHR that works across a variety of EHR systems
    Turning data into knowledge
    Develop a standardized means of using archetypes based on CEN/ISO 13606 within EHR systems
    Maintain up-to-date terminology services that can be used by both clinical and research systems
    Promote the wide reuse and archiving of defined research data elements via CEN/ISO 11179
    Start to link well-defined clinical concepts with well-defined research concepts by mapping archetypes to defined data elements
    Create domain specific data models, linking together via BRIDG to enable sharing of archetypes and data elements between domains
    Create open-source middleware capable of brokering data exchange and clinical research activities (recruitment, follow-up, etc) between clinical systems
    Extend clinical research standards to enable sharing computable representations of clinical study protocols between systems

    • BRIDG = Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group; EHR = electronic health record; CEN = European Committee for Standardization; ISO = International Organization for Standardization.

Additional Files

  • Supplemental Appendix and Figure

    Supplemental Appendix: Glossary of Terms; Supplemental Figure 1. Electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN) architecture.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

  • The Article in Brief

    Envisioning a Learning Health Care System: The Electronic Primary Care Research Network, a Case Study

    Brendan C. Delaney , and colleagues

    Background Highlighting both the challenges and opportunities for using existing electronic clinical data from dispersed primary care practices for large-scale clinical research, the authors examine options and evaluate a functional software prototype for facilitating research in community practice settings. The electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePRN) project was one of 12 funded by the National Institutes of Health with the aim of developing clinical research.

    What This Study Found This study identifies requirements for delivering clinical studies via a distributed electronic network linked to electronic health records. The study finds that electronic health record systems must use more sophisticated tools to capture and preserve rich clinical context in coded data. The authors also identify barriers to adopting prototype software in practice-based research networks, and describe an international consortium and model for sharing further developments across ongoing projects in the United States and Europe.

    Implications

    • To fully realize the vision of a true learning health care system, the authors call for the creation of an open market for e-health applications. Such a system, they assert, can be achieved only through open collaboration between the various stakeholders � from clinicians to vendors � with the goal of creating a single shared architecture.
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Get Permissions

Jump to section

Subjects