Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Extended Office Hours and Health Care Expenditures: A National Study

Anthony Jerant, Klea D. Bertakis, Joshua J. Fenton and Peter Franks
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2012, 10 (5) 388-395; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1382
Anthony Jerant
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: afjerant@ucdavis.edu
Klea D. Bertakis
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua J. Fenton
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Franks
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Respondent Characteristics by Reported Extended-Hours Access

    Access to Extended Hoursa
    CharacteristicNo (n=21,817)Yes (n=11,452)Total (N=33,269)
    Year 1 characteristics
    Female, % (SE)57.6 (0.3)55.9 (0.4)57.0 (0.3)
    Age, mean (SE), y51.8 (0.2)45.7 (0.2)49.7 (0.2)
    Race/ethnicity, % (SE)
     White77.1 (0.7)76.1 (0.9)76.8 (0.6)
     Hispanic8.5 (0.5)8.6 (0.5)8.5 (0.4)
     Black9.7 (0.5)9.6 (0.5)9.7 (0.4)
     Other4.7 (0.3)5.7 (0.4)5.0 (0.3)
    Family income, % (SE) of FPL
     <100%9.7 (0.3)7.2 (0.3)8.8 (0.3)
     100% to <125%4.1 (0.2)2.8 (0.2)3.6 (0.1)
     125% to <200%12.9 (0.4)10.3 (0.4)11.9 (0.3)
     200% to <400%30.5 (0.4)31.8 (0.7)31.0 (0.4)
     ≥400%42.9 (0.6)47.9 (0.9)44.7 (0.6)
    Education, % (SE)
     Less than high school6.7 (0.3)4.4 (0.2)5.9 (0.2)
     Some high school11.1 (0.3)10.5 (0.4)10.9 (0.2)
     High school graduate32.2 (0.5)33.8 (0.6)32.8 (0.4)
     Some college23.1 (0.4)24.1 (0.5)23.4 (0.3)
     College graduate26.9 (0.6)27.3 (0.7)27.0 (0.5)
    Urban residence, % (SE)76.0 (1.2)86.3 (0.9)79.7 (0.9)
    US Census region, % (SE)
     Northeast14.8 (0.9)29.0 (1.6)19.9 (0.9)
     Midwest20.6 (1.0)27.6 (1.4)23.1 (0.9)
     South43.8 (1.3)22.8 (1.3)36.3 (1.1)
     West20.8 (1.3)20.6 (1.3)20.8 (1.1)
    Year 2 characteristics
    Health insurance, % (SE)
     Private75.9 (0.5)81.5 (0.6)77.9 (0.4)
     Public17.7 (0.4)11.7 (0.5)15.6 (0.4)
     None6.4 (0.2)6.8 (0.3)6.6 (0.2)
    Health conditions, mean (SE), No.b1.2 (0.0)0.8 (0.0)1.1 (0.0)
    PCS-12 score, mean (SE)c47.0 (0.1)49.8 (0.1)48.0 (0.1)
    MCS-12 score, mean (SE)c50.7 (0.1)51.4 (0.1)50.9 (0.1)
    Self-rated health, % (SE)
     Excellent19.2 (0.4)22.5 (0.6)20.4 (0.4)
     Very good33.6 (0.5)37.4 (0.7)34.9 (0.4)
     Good30.3 (0.4)28.6 (0.6)29.7 (0.3)
     Fair12.2 (0.3)8.8 (0.3)11.0 (0.3)
     Poor4.7 (0.2)2.7 (0.2)4.0 (0.1)
    Smoker, % (SE)17.3 (0.3)18.7 (0.5)17.8 (0.3)
    Body mass index in kg/m2, % (SE)
     <204.9 (0.2)4.6 (0.2)4.8 (0.1)
     20 to <2529.8 (0.4)30.7 (0.6)30.1 (0.3)
     25 to <3035.8 (0.4)36.3 (0.5)35.9 (0.3)
     ≥3029.5 (0.5)28.4 (0.6)29.1 (0.4)
    • FPL = federal poverty level; MCS-12 = the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary; PCS-12 = SF-12 Physical Component Summary.

    • Note: Percentages are population weighted.

    • ↵a No group = 64.2% (SE 0.8); Yes group = 35.8% (SE 0.8).

    • ↵b From a count of 8 conditions: diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, asthma, emphysema, and arthritis.

    • ↵c Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Respondent Health Care Use and Expenditures by Reported Extended-Hours Access

    Access to Extended Hoursa
    MeasureNo (n=21,817)Yes (n=11,452)Total (N=33,269)
    Office visits
    Year 1
     Number, mean (SE)5.3 (0.1)4.3 (0.1)4.9 (0.1)
     Expenditures, mean (SE), $1,261.0 (23.9)973.9 (31.5)1,158.8 (20.1)
    Year 2
     Number, mean (SE)5.4 (0.1)4.2 (0.1)5.0 (0.1)
     Expenditures, mean (SE), $1,229.4 (34.1)947.4 (39.4)1,129.0 (28.2)
    Prescription medications
    Year 1
     Number, mean (SE)19.6 (0.3)13.2 (0.3)17.4 (0.2)
     Expenditures, mean (SE) $1,283.4 (22.7)833.6 (21.3)1,123.4 (17.5)
    Year 2
     Number, mean (SE)19.3 (0.3)13.1 (0.3)17.1 (0.2)
     Expenditures, mean (SE), $1,307.5 (22.0)894.2 (31.2)1,160.5 (19.4)
    Emergency department visits
    Year 1
     Having any, % (SE)15.5 (0.3)13.6 (0.4)14.8 (0.3)
     Expenditures, mean (SE), $142.7 (5.0)122.5 (7.4)135.5 (4.3)
    Year 2
     Having any, % (SE)16.0 (0.3)13.1 (0.4)14.9 (0.3)
     Expenditures, mean (SE), $144.0 (6.0)123.3 (10.6)136.6 (5.2)
    Hospitalizations
    Year 1
     Having any, % (SE)11.0 (0.3)8.2 (0.3)10.0 (0.2)
     Expenditures, mean (SE), $1,391.0 (55.0)1,038.9 (133.6)1,265.7 (59.4)
    Year 2
     Having any, % (SE)11.9 (0.3)8.7 (0.3)10.7 (0.2)
     Expenditures, mean (SE), $1,746.9 (66.8)1,203.4 (116.2)1,553.6 (57.9)
    Total expenditures
    Year 1, mean (SE), $5,173.7 (87.7)3,852.4 (157.0)4,703.6 (82.5)
    Year 2, mean (SE), $5,522.3 (99.5)4,067.1 (171.0)5,004.6 (90.6)
    • Note: Percentages are population weighted.

    • ↵a No group = 64.2% (SE 0.8); Yes group = 35.8% (SE 0.8).

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Adjusted Associations Between Sample Characteristics and Logarithm of Year 2 Total Health Care Expenditures (N=30,714)

    CharacteristicaAdjusted Parameter Estimate (95% CI)P Value
    Access to extended hours in both year 1 and year 2 (reference = no access in both years)−0.11 (−0.14 to −0.07)<.01
    Age, y0.02 (0.01 to 0.02)<.01
    Female0.19 (0.16 to 0.22)<.01
    Race/ethnicity (reference=white)
     Hispanic−0.22 (−0.28 to −0.16)<.01
     Black−0.22 (−0.28 to −0.16)<.01
     Other−0.20 (−0.29 to −0.12)<.01
    Income, % of FPL (reference = <100%)
     100% to <125%−0.06 (−0.15 to 0.03).20
     125% to <200%0.00 (−0.07 to 0.06).98
     200% to <400%0.04 (−0.03 to 0.10).24
     ≥400%0.16 (0.09 to 0.22)<.01
    Education (reference = no high school)
     Some high school0.08 (−0.00 to 0.16).05
     High school graduate0.15 (0.09 to 0.22)<.01
     Some college0.23 (0.16 to 0.30)<.01
     College graduate0.33 (0.26 to 0.40)<.01
    Urban residence0.06 (0.02 to 0.11)<.01
    US Census region (reference = Northeast)
     Midwest0.08 (0.02 to 0.13).01
     South−0.03 (−0.08 to 0.03).34
     West−0.01 (−0.06 to 0.05).80
    Health insurance (reference = private), year 2
     Public−0.12 (−0.17 to −0.06)<.01
     None−0.51 (−0.58 to −0.43)<.01
    Count of chronic health conditions, year 20.09 (0.07 to 0.10)<.01
    Health status, year 2
     PCS-12 score−0.02 (−0.02 to −0.02)<.01
     MCS-12 score−0.01 (−0.01 to 0.00)<.01
    Self-rated health, year 2 (reference = excellent)
     Very good0.20 (0.15 to 0.25)<.01
     Good0.31 (0.25 to 0.37)<.01
     Fair0.36 (0.28 to 0.44)<.01
     Poor0.57 (0.45 to 0.68)<.01
    Health care use
     Total health care expenditures, per $1,000 increase0.01 (0.01 to 0.01)<.01
     Any hospitalization (reference = none)−0.05 (−0.11 to 0.00).06
     Any emergency department visit (reference=none)0.15 (0.11 to 0.19)<.01
     Office visits, number0.03 (0.03 to 0.03)<.01
     Prescription medications, number0.01 (0.01 to 0.01)<.01
    • FPL = federal poverty level; MCS-12 = the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary; PCS-12 = SF-12 Physical Component Summary.

    • Note: Analyses also adjusted for Medical Expenditures Panel Survey panel year.

    • ↵a Characteristics measured in year 1 unless noted.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Adjusted Percentage Change in Year 2 Total Health Care Expenditures Associated With Extended-Hours Access With Progressive Adjustment for Year 2 Health Care Use

    AnalysisAdjusted % Change in Year 2 Total Health Care Expenditures (95% CI)P Value
    Base model−10.4 (−13.4 to −7.2)<.01
    Model with progressive adjustment for year 2:
     Emergency department and inpatient expenditures−9.1 (−11.8 to −6.3)<.01
     + Numbers of office visits and prescription medications−8.4 (−11.0 to −5.8)<.01
     + Prescription medication expenditures−5.7 (−8.1 to −3.3)<.01
     + Office visit expenditures−4.3 (−6.5 to −2.0)<.01
    • Note: All analyses adjusted for year 1 age, sex, race/ethnicity (white [reference], Hispanic, black, other), income (≤100% [reference], 100% to <125%, 125% to <200%, 200% to <400%, or ≥400% of federal poverty level), education (no high school [reference], some high school, high school graduate, some college, college graduate), Metropolitan Statistical Area, Census region (Northeast [reference], Midwest, South, West), health insurance (private [reference], public, none), total health care expenditures, hospitalizations (any vs none), emergency department visits (any vs none), number of office visits, and number of prescription medications; year 2 count of 8 chronic health conditions, the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores, and self-rated health; and Medical Expenditures Panel Survey panel year.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Anthony Jerant , and colleagues

    Background Timely access to care could allow earlier diagnosis and treatment of health conditions and reduce health care expenditures. This study examines the relationship between access to extended (evening and weekend) office hours and health care utilization, outcomes, and expenditures, as well as mortality.

    What This Study Found Patients who have access to a regular source of health care that offers evening and weekend hours have significantly lower health expenditures than those who do not. In this study, total expenditures were 10 percent lower among patients reporting access to extended hours compared to those lacking such access, an association related to lower prescription drug and expenditures related to office visits (such as testing). The reduced expenditures do not have apparent adverse effects on mortality.

    Implications

    • Extended office hours may be associated with relatively judicious use of primary health care resources, including more generic medication prescribing and less discretionary testing.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (5)
Vol. 10, Issue 5
September/October 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Extended Office Hours and Health Care Expenditures: A National Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Extended Office Hours and Health Care Expenditures: A National Study
Anthony Jerant, Klea D. Bertakis, Joshua J. Fenton, Peter Franks
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2012, 10 (5) 388-395; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1382

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Extended Office Hours and Health Care Expenditures: A National Study
Anthony Jerant, Klea D. Bertakis, Joshua J. Fenton, Peter Franks
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2012, 10 (5) 388-395; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1382
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Neurology Access Clinic: A Model to Improve Access to Neurologic Care in an Academic Medical Center
  • Emergency Department Use and Enrollment in a Medical Home Providing After-Hours Care
  • Simplifying care: when is the treatment burden too much for patients living in poverty?
  • Extended opening hours in primary care: helpful for patients and--or--a distraction for health professionals?
  • Effects of New Funding Models for Patient-Centered Medical Homes on Primary Care Practice Finances and Services: Results of a Microsimulation Model
  • Primary Care Attributes Associated with Receipt of Preventive Care Services: A National Study
  • Nonemergent Emergency Department Use Among Patients With a Usual Source of Care
  • In This Issue: Local+Familiar=Healthier
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family Physicians in Focused Practice in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Level Study of Trends From 1993/1994 Through 2021/2022
  • Seven Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Electronic Visits: Qualitative Study of Staff and Patient Views
  • Agile Implementation of a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Dementia in Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine