Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Clinician Suspicion of an Alcohol Problem: An Observational Study From the AAFP National Research Network

Daniel C. Vinson, Barbara J. Turner, MSED, Brian K. Manning and James M. Galliher
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2013, 11 (1) 53-59; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1464
Daniel C. Vinson
1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
MDMSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: VinsonD@health.missouri.edu
Barbara J. Turner
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MSED
2ReACH Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian K. Manning
3AAFP National Research Network, Leawood, Kansas
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James M. Galliher
3AAFP National Research Network, Leawood, Kansas
4Department of Sociology, University of Missouri—Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Flowchart of patient enrollment.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Alcohol Use Categories Based on Patient Self-Report

    CategoryStandard DefinitionaStudy Definitionb
    No alcohol consumptionDenies alcohol use on AUDIT-C and DSM-IV–based questions
    Moderate drinkingOn 1 occasion drinking <4 drinks for a woman or <5 drinks for a man, and in a week drinking <8 drinks for a woman or <15 drinks for a manNegative on both the AUDIT-C and the 2-question DSM-IV– based screen
    HazardousdrinkingcOn 1 occasion drinking >3 drinks for a woman or >4 drinks for a man, or in a week drinking >7 drinks for a woman or >14 drinks for a manPositive AUDIT-C but negative on the 2-question DSM-IV–based screen
    HarmfuldrinkingcAlcohol use disorders, ie, alcohol abuse or alcohol dependence defined using DSM-IV criteriaPositive on the 2-question DSM-IV–based screen, with or without a positive AUDIT-C
    • AUDIT-C = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption; DSM-IV = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV.

    • ↵a From the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.39,40

    • ↵b Based on patients’ responses to our screening instruments. See the Supplemental Appendix for the AUDIT-C scoring key.

    • ↵c Alcohol problems defined as either hazardous or harmful drinking as identified on screening tests noted above.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Sensitivity of Clinician Suspicion Using Different Criteria to Identify Which Patients Have an Alcohol Problem

    Criteria and Threshold for Identifying Patients With Alcohol ProblemSensitivity %
    Total AUDIT-C score: a positive screening test defined as a score at the given level or above
    ≥3 (women), ≥4 (men)16.1
      6
      7
      8
      9
      1061.1
    Changing a positive screening test to negative if drinking on a “typical day” was ≤2 drinks and if the frequency of episodic heavy drinking was less often than monthly21.6
    Changing a positive screen to negative if drinking on a “typical day” was ≤2 drinks regardless of the frequency of episodic heavy drinking21.7
    Using only the third AUDIT-C question on episodic heavy drinking
      Monthly27.9
      Weekly38.7
      Daily or almost daily73.3
    • AUDIT-C = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendix

    Supplemental Appendix. Scoring Key for the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C)

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file, 1 page, 188 KB
  • The Article in Brief

    Clinician Suspicion of an Alcohol Problem: An Observational Study From the AAFP National Research Network

    Daniel C. Vinson , and colleagues

    Background In clinical practice, detection of alcohol problems often relies on clinicians' suspicion instead of use of a screening instrument. This study assesses the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of clinician suspicion compared with screen-detected alcohol problems.

    What This Study Found In this study, primary care clinicians missed most (more than 70 percent) of patients with an alcohol problem when they relied on clinical suspicion instead of using a screening instrument. In a sample of 1,699 patients, 171 patients (10 percent) screened positive for hazardous drinking and 64 patients (4 percent) screened positive for harmful drinking using validated screening instruments. Clinicians suspected either hazardous or harmful drinking in only 81 of those patients (5 percent). Conversely, when clinicians suspected a patient had an alcohol problem, they were correct 98 percent of the time.

    Implications

    • These findings, the authors conclude, support the routine use of a screening tool to supplement clinicians' suspicions about alcohol problems.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (1)
Vol. 11, Issue 1
January/February 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinician Suspicion of an Alcohol Problem: An Observational Study From the AAFP National Research Network
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Clinician Suspicion of an Alcohol Problem: An Observational Study From the AAFP National Research Network
Daniel C. Vinson, Barbara J. Turner, MSED, Brian K. Manning, James M. Galliher
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 11 (1) 53-59; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1464

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Clinician Suspicion of an Alcohol Problem: An Observational Study From the AAFP National Research Network
Daniel C. Vinson, Barbara J. Turner, MSED, Brian K. Manning, James M. Galliher
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 11 (1) 53-59; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1464
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments:
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In This Issue: How We Think and Feel Influences Patient Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Artificial Intelligence Tools for Preconception Cardiomyopathy Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age
  • Family Physicians in Focused Practice in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Level Study of Trends From 1993/1994 Through 2021/2022
  • Seven Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Electronic Visits: Qualitative Study of Staff and Patient Views
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • PBRN research
    • Professional practice

Keywords

  • alcoholism, prevention & control
  • hazardous drinking
  • drinking behavior
  • mass screening

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine