Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
DiscussionSpecial Reports

In Search of Joy in Practice: A Report of 23 High-Functioning Primary Care Practices

Christine A. Sinsky, Rachel Willard-Grace, Andrew M. Schutzbank, Thomas A. Sinsky, David Margolius and Thomas Bodenheimer
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2013, 11 (3) 272-278; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1531
Christine A. Sinsky
1Medical Associates Clinic and Health Plans, Dubuque, Iowa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: csinsky1@mahealthcare.com
Rachel Willard-Grace
2Center for Excellence in Primary Care, University of California, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew M. Schutzbank
3Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
4Iora Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas A. Sinsky
1Medical Associates Clinic and Health Plans, Dubuque, Iowa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Margolius
2Center for Excellence in Primary Care, University of California, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Bodenheimer
2Center for Excellence in Primary Care, University of California, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Did I Miss Something?
    Robert S Watkins
    Published on: 10 September 2013
  • Author response: Reinventing the Wheel
    Christine A. Sinsky, MD FACP
    Published on: 17 July 2013
  • Reinventing the Wheel
    Richard D. Iliff
    Published on: 13 July 2013
  • Authors' response: In Search of Joy in Practice
    Christine A Sinsky
    Published on: 11 July 2013
  • Dig Deeper
    Richard A Young
    Published on: 24 June 2013
  • Published on: (10 September 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Did I Miss Something?
    Did I Miss Something?
    • Robert S Watkins, physician

    I couldn't find where the authors demonstrated that the physicians in the profiled practices experienced any more joy than their peers: it just seemed like they had been trained to run a little faster on the treadmill.

    Did I miss something, or did the authors just ignore what seemed to be their basic premise?

    Competing interests: ?? None declared

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (17 July 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Author response: Reinventing the Wheel
    Author response: Reinventing the Wheel
    • Christine A. Sinsky, MD FACP, Physician.
    • Other Contributors:

    Many thanks to Dr. Iliff for sharing his positive experience in primary care, and for echoing many of the conclusions of our study. We agree regarding the importance of integrating rather than fragmenting care: when a patient can see their primary care physician for management of one problem there is the opportunity to touch base on the patient's other conditions and to build trust and relationship. Such integration is...

    Show More

    Many thanks to Dr. Iliff for sharing his positive experience in primary care, and for echoing many of the conclusions of our study. We agree regarding the importance of integrating rather than fragmenting care: when a patient can see their primary care physician for management of one problem there is the opportunity to touch base on the patient's other conditions and to build trust and relationship. Such integration is lessened when the patient is sent to multiple providers for their clinical care. We also agree about the net value of 3:1 clinical staffing, particularly when it is the same people each day. In our own practice we each work with 3 Associates Degree RNs while in clinic, a set-up we consider optimal for patient care and for financial stability.

    There are many different compositions of "teams." While some practices have successfully divided up the clinical aspects of primary care among multiple providers, often in independent care episodes (pharmacist for hypertension care, nurse for diabetes care....) we personally prefer a more tightly integrated model with fewer remote or electronic handoffs. In our "Collaborative Care Model" the nurse stays with the patient from the beginning to the end of their appointment, acting as the patient's advocate, guide and health coach. During the first component the nurse obtains vitals, performs medication reconciliation, gathers information relevant to the appointment, helps the patient set the agenda and begins to record the history. She also ensures the patient is up to date with all prevention measures and explains the laboratory results to the patient, engaging in motivational interviewing and self-management support for weight loss, smoking cessation, or other issues. The physician then joins the appointment, builds on the history, performs the exam, and together with the patient and nurse, helps to craft a plan. It is a three way conversation, with the nurse also recording some of the visit in real time. One explicit goal is to increase the time the physician is able to provide undivided attention to the patient (i.e. hands-off-the-keyboard, eyes-out-of-the-chart time.) After the physician component, the nurse stays with the patient, operationalizing the plan and reinforcing instructions. In some cases the nurse will make between visit calls to follow up on the patient's symptoms or their progress with a lifestyle modification.

    We also agree with Dr. Iliff regarding the challenges of this first generation of EHRs, which too often display, as he says, much "clutter of unnecessary information," thereby adding to the time and cognitive workload of the nurses and physicians. While we would not chose to return to the pre-electronic era, we believe EHR usability must improve dramatically for the hoped for benefits associated with its widespread implementation to be realized.

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (13 July 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Reinventing the Wheel
    Reinventing the Wheel
    • Richard D. Iliff, family physician

    I appreciate the thrust of this article, Dr. Young's thoughtful suggestions, and the careful response of the authors. When we ask this question, our specialty is headed in the right direction. So I'm going to toss in my two cents, having written extensively on this subject starting in an FPM article from 1998 (http://www.aafp.org/fpm/2003/1000/p23.html) and continuing with my "Making It" blog (http://blogs.aafp.org/fpm...

    Show More

    I appreciate the thrust of this article, Dr. Young's thoughtful suggestions, and the careful response of the authors. When we ask this question, our specialty is headed in the right direction. So I'm going to toss in my two cents, having written extensively on this subject starting in an FPM article from 1998 (http://www.aafp.org/fpm/2003/1000/p23.html) and continuing with my "Making It" blog (http://blogs.aafp.org/fpm/makingit/) while I served on the FPM board of editors. My concern is that the selection criteria for practices in this study, which include PCMH certification and EHR use, precludes consideration of practices like mine-- and therefore fail to examine an old-fashioned but time-honored way of doing things which many of us dinosaurs have found to be joyful. Let me stipulate: my income for 27 years has always been double the FP median; I work 40 hours per week and rarely get paged, despite taking my own call Monday through Friday and every third weekend; I deliver all my own babies, averaging 16 per year; but I have given up rounds at the two local hospitals to hospitalists, because they do a better job than I can. I am not stressed. I don't have any "difficult" patients, although some are more challenging than others. When I was chosen at random to participate in a focus group at the national meeting last October, I was stunned by the hostility of my younger colleagues toward their chosen profession. They were not having any fun. How could this be? What has changed since I graduated the first family medicine fellowship in 1979?

    Here are some questions for reflection or research:

    1. Is the "team" concept as efficient as advertised? I work with 3 RNs every day, and some of the time they are doing work which could be delegated to less-educated MAs; on the other hand, I get very few questions, because they know what I'm going to say. Since communication must increase logarithmically as staff increases arithmetically, does all that extra chit-chat increase stress, as well as noise? Did you go into medicine to be a manager?

    2. Is the EHR ready for prime time? I'm an early adopter, and I still won't buy one (although all my prescriptions are electronic). The EHR is a clutter of unnecessary information; I'll challenge anyone to a John Henry contest with my paper charts against their EHR in a race to record and retrieve information. My eyes are almost always on the patient, not the keyboard. Disease registers would be nice, but I still sail through NCQA and board modules by pulling random charts. Most of the HIPAA death threats I can safely ignore: no pimply Dutch teenager can hack into my records. He will have to fly to Topeka, break in to the office, evade the alarm system, and figure out how my charting system works. Power outage? No problem for me.

    3. Is it efficient to share staff among providers? Dr. Laccheo and I share a building we own together, but we don't share staff. As a result, every time a patient calls my office, she will talk to someone who knows me and knows her. There's no phone tree. It's a live body every call. I don't care how big the building is. You could have 100 MD/DOs, but if you keep the staffs and phone lines segregated, every encounter feels like a personal encounter to the patient.

    I could go on, but to summarize my challenge: what's the problem with being "physician-centric"? I thought fragmentation of care was the problem our specialty was called to solve. Or are we, like Humpty-Dumpty, fragmenting our offices so the "teams" can put him back together again? I've been using a PA for 26 years, but only for episodic pour-over care to assure that my patients can be seen the same day; the heavy lifting is on me. As a result, I have a practice full of long-time friends who I look forward to seeing every day I head for the office. New patients (I don't advertise like my competition, who all work for hospitals) complain that they never saw their doctor. Is this the model we have created? Does this contribute to the joie de vivre which will attract residents to family medicine? Is this why our lemming-like residents are falling into corporate practices, terrified to face the imagined rigors of the free market? Is the whole PCMH/TransforMed model an hypothesis in desperate search of confirmatory evidence, prematurely birthed upon the specialty by academics in search of tenure? Have we lost our minds?

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (11 July 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Authors' response: In Search of Joy in Practice
    Authors' response: In Search of Joy in Practice
    • Christine A Sinsky, Physician.
    • Other Contributors:

    We are delighted by Dr. Young's response and couldn't agree more that fundamental changes are needed with respect to documentation requirements and tools. In fact, for primary care to add the most value and be a sustainable specialty, we believe change has to occur on many levels, including how healthcare resources are distributed, medical care is regulated and information is managed.

    We also agree that the perv...

    Show More

    We are delighted by Dr. Young's response and couldn't agree more that fundamental changes are needed with respect to documentation requirements and tools. In fact, for primary care to add the most value and be a sustainable specialty, we believe change has to occur on many levels, including how healthcare resources are distributed, medical care is regulated and information is managed.

    We also agree that the perversities in the existing evaluation and management coding rules have adversely affected the way doctors use their time and training. As we point out in the paper the visit note is too often driven by a billing template, complicating the cognitive work for clinicians. The chart risks becoming primarily a documentation tool to justify coding rather than a communication tool for clinical care. We have concerns that Meaningful Use Stage 2, which many institutions have interpreted to mean only the provider can perform computerized order entry (COE), may further burden primary care physicians. COE is a clerical task we believe, in most circumstances, can continue to be capably entrusted to clerical members of the care team.

    We agree with Dr. Young's concerns about current the payment model. In our study we found practices that could afford an extended care team of social worker, nutritionist and/or pharmacist were generally those with external funding or that were in a global payment model. In our white paper http://www.abimfoundation.org/Initiatives/~/media/Files/Primary%20Care/Finding%20Joy%20in%20PracticeFULL%20WHITE%20PAPER060313.ashx we state "Primary care is unlikely to thrive at current reimbursement levels. Higher levels of practice revenue are needed to support the additional services, non-visit based care and multi-disciplinary team approaches which are anticipated to improve quality and reduce global costs of care."

    We deeply empathize with Dr. Young's frustration with EHRs. While we don't advocate abolishment of EHRs, we do agree that large scale improvements in utility and usability are urgently needed. In our white paper we call for better user interfaces that require fewer clicks and scrolls, and better display of data. In our action steps http://www.abimfoundation.org/Initiatives/~/media/Files/Primary%20Care/Primary%20Care%20Action%20Steps.ashx we call for technology that facilitates greater teamwork, such as allowing multiple users in the same chart simultaneously, quick hand-offs between users and team log-ins.

    Even as we work to reform CMS Evaluation and Management requirements, Meaningful Use regulations, and other policies that constrain high quality primary care, we believe that engaging the team in collaborative models of care is the path to better quality care. While documentation requirements and EMRs remain problematic, collaborative documentation with non- clinicians can alleviate the negative fall-out on patient care and clinician well-being, and that is no small thing. Beyond this our experience leads us to believe that there is intrinsic value to empowering nurses or other clinical assistants to be deeply engaged in the healthcare encounter. Within our own practice, we have found that the presence of a nurse in the medical visit ensures greater efficiency (as the clinician does not need to repeat the care plan), more health coaching, stronger care coordination and overall better care for the patient.

    Striving for the payment models and policies to support high quality healthcare is of prime importance. Even as we pour our energies into that effort, it is helpful to recognize that there are exceptional practices within the current system that can help us forge a path toward better primary care and greater joy in practice.

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (24 June 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Dig Deeper
    Dig Deeper
    • Richard A Young, Director of Research

    I applaud the efforts of the authors to seek out generalizable knowledge -- i.e. helpful hints -- for practice changes family physicians could possibly implement in their practices that might result in better job satisfaction. However, I was disappointed that their interviews did not dig deeper. The first line of the Discussion is the most important message: "The current practice model in primary care is unsustainable."...

    Show More

    I applaud the efforts of the authors to seek out generalizable knowledge -- i.e. helpful hints -- for practice changes family physicians could possibly implement in their practices that might result in better job satisfaction. However, I was disappointed that their interviews did not dig deeper. The first line of the Discussion is the most important message: "The current practice model in primary care is unsustainable." The problem with these interviews is that they assumed that we're stuck with the existing documentation, coding, and billing rules we've been burdened with since the mid-1990s. No comment was reported that challenged these underlying structural problems. Some practices may be moving to a better model, but the real reform that needs to occur is not for practices to further bend and twist to conform to a flawed payment system, but for the payment system to actually support our important work. If the family physicians felt that their work was reduced to mindlessly checking boxes just to conform to documentation/billing rules, one solution is to enlist team members' help in checking the boxes. A better solution is to get rid of the regulations requiring that we check boxes. If electronic medical records cause tasks to take minutes now that took seconds in the paper era, then get rid of electronic medical records (heresy, I realize). If we can't bring ourselves to demand this, then we should demand that we be paid for the extra documentation time. The existing CMS Evaluation and Management rules are the root cause of much of our despair. They were written in the mid-1990s by academic physicians who mostly only care for one body part, which is why they do not fit our complex patient care realities very well. The answer to the problem of joy in practice is to throw away the existing documentation, coding, and billing rules and start all over. The question is: Do we have the courage for the fight?

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (3)
Vol. 11, Issue 3
May/June 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Search of Joy in Practice: A Report of 23 High-Functioning Primary Care Practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
In Search of Joy in Practice: A Report of 23 High-Functioning Primary Care Practices
Christine A. Sinsky, Rachel Willard-Grace, Andrew M. Schutzbank, Thomas A. Sinsky, David Margolius, Thomas Bodenheimer
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2013, 11 (3) 272-278; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1531

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
In Search of Joy in Practice: A Report of 23 High-Functioning Primary Care Practices
Christine A. Sinsky, Rachel Willard-Grace, Andrew M. Schutzbank, Thomas A. Sinsky, David Margolius, Thomas Bodenheimer
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2013, 11 (3) 272-278; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1531
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • SOLUTIONS TO COMMON PROBLEMS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FUTURE RESEARCH
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Primary Care 2.0: A Prospective Evaluation of a Novel Model of Advanced Team Care With Expanded Medical Assistant Support
  • Trauma-Informed Care
  • Primary Care Clinician Burnout and Engagement Association With Clinical Quality and Patient Experience
  • Primary care and point-of-care testing during a pandemic: Clinicians perspectives on integrating rapid testing for COVID-19 into the primary care pathway
  • Standardization vs Customization: Finding the Right Balance
  • Impact of team-based community healthcare on preventable hospitalisation: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan
  • Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act in Small to Medium-Sized Primary Care Practices
  • The Built Environment for Professionalism
  • Association of physician payment model and team-based care with timely access in primary care: a population-based cross-sectional study
  • Primary Care Practice Transformation Introduces Different Staff Roles
  • Team Configurations, Efficiency, and Family Physician Burnout
  • Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature
  • What is clinician presence? A qualitative interview study comparing physician and non-physician insights about practices of human connection
  • Associations Between Burnout and Practice Organization in Family Physicians
  • Staff and Clinician Work-Life Perceptions after Implementing Systems-Based Improvements to Opioid Management
  • PURSUING PRACTICAL PROFESSIONALISM: FORM FOLLOWS FUNCTION
  • Practice Transformation Under the University of Colorados Primary Care Redesign Model
  • Ten tips for advancing a culture of improvement in primary care
  • Primary Care Providers Believe That Comprehensive Medication Management Improves Their Work-Life
  • Powering-Up Primary Care Teams: Advanced Team Care With In-Room Support
  • How do doctors experience the interactions among professional fulfilment, organisational factors and quality of patient care? A qualitative study in a Norwegian hospital
  • Sources and Impact of Time Pressure on Opioid Management in the Safety-Net
  • Burnout and Health Care Workforce Turnover
  • Burnout in neurology: Extinguishing the embers and rekindling the joy in practice
  • Physician Burnout: Resilience Training is Only Part of the Solution
  • Transforming Nephrology
  • Task Delegation and Burnout Trade-offs Among Primary Care Providers and Nurses in Veterans Affairs Patient Aligned Care Teams (VA PACTs)
  • Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care
  • Joy In Medical Practice: Clinician Satisfaction In The Healthy Work Place Trial
  • Tethered to the EHR: Primary Care Physician Workload Assessment Using EHR Event Log Data and Time-Motion Observations
  • Access to Primary Care Appointments Following 2014 Insurance Expansions
  • "A Paradox Persists When the Paradigm Is Wrong": Pisacano Scholars' Reflections from the Inaugural Starfield Summit
  • Holding On and Letting Go: A Perspective from the Keystone IV Conference
  • A Primary Care Panel Size of 2500 Is neither Accurate nor Reasonable
  • Next big thing: integrating medical scribes into academic medical centres
  • Maximizing the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) by Choosing Words Wisely
  • Estimating the Residency Expansion Required to Avoid Projected Primary Care Physician Shortages by 2035
  • Recommendations for a Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home
  • Effects of Primary Care Team Social Networks on Quality of Care and Costs for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
  • From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider
  • Health Is Primary: Family Medicine for America's Health
  • What keeps family physicians busy in Portugal? A multicentre observational study of work other than direct patient contacts
  • Staffing Patterns of Primary Care Practices in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative
  • Team Structure and Culture Are Associated With Lower Burnout in Primary Care
  • The 10 Building Blocks of High-Performing Primary Care
  • The Quest for Effective Care Coordination
  • Expanding Primary Care Capacity By Reducing Waste And Improving The Efficiency Of Care
  • Primary Care: Proposed Solutions To The Physician Shortage Without Training More Physicians
  • Practice Transformation? Opportunities and Costs for Primary Care Practices
  • In This Issue: Practice Change--Context Matters
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Revolutionizing Health Professions Admissions to Achieve an Inclusive Workforce
  • 100 Million Mouths Campaign: Creating a Pilot Program to Advance Oral Health Equity
  • Transforming Medical Education to Provide Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients: A Policy Brief
Show more Special Reports

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Organizational / practice change
    • Social / cultural context
    • Possible emerging topic

Keywords

  • personal satisfaction
  • physician
  • health care delivery
  • health services research
  • patient-centered care
  • primary health care
  • patient care team
  • burnout
  • professional
  • organizational innovation

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine