Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale

Erin P. Finley, Jacqueline A. Pugh, Holly Jordan Lanham, Luci K. Leykum, John Cornell, Poornachand Veerapaneni and Michael L. Parchman
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2013, 11 (6) 543-549; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1554
Erin P. Finley
1South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
2Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: finleye@uthscsa.edu
Jacqueline A. Pugh
1South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
2Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holly Jordan Lanham
1South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
2Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
3McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
4Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luci K. Leykum
1South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
2Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Cornell
5Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Poornachand Veerapaneni
4Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael L. Parchman
6MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation, Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Re: Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale
    David C Mohr
    Published on: 07 February 2014
  • Re: Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale
    Michelle Howard
    Published on: 23 January 2014
  • Published on: (7 February 2014)
    Page navigation anchor for Re: Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale
    Re: Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale
    • David C Mohr, (1), Research Investigator.
    • Other Contributors:

    Finley and colleagues' paper presents the development and multi-modal validation of a 15-item scale to assess work relationships among clinicians and staff in the delivery of primary care. Much interest exists among academics and practitioners in identifying, operationalizing, and measuring essential variables for work relationships among members of healthcare teams (1, 2, 3). Many of these efforts have led to the develo...

    Show More

    Finley and colleagues' paper presents the development and multi-modal validation of a 15-item scale to assess work relationships among clinicians and staff in the delivery of primary care. Much interest exists among academics and practitioners in identifying, operationalizing, and measuring essential variables for work relationships among members of healthcare teams (1, 2, 3). Many of these efforts have led to the development of survey-based instruments that often share certain common domains (e.g., communication) but also differ in their inclusion of other domains. Even among instruments that share domains, differences often exist regarding conceptualization and measurement.

    Finley et al., developed their scale by drawing from a conceptual model comprising seven characteristics of work relationships. (4) In addition to various psychometric analyses, they also assessed the validity of their scale through qualitative methods that entailed interviews at different clinics that scored on either the high or low end of their scale. We believe the combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches toward scale validation is a great strength of the study. We also suggest further research using mixed methods to distinguish, conceptually and empirically, important differences among scales that measure characteristics of effective work relationships among members of healthcare delivery teams. For example, what distinguishes a scale of relational coordination from one of relational climate, which have both been presented as a scales for measuring work relationships in healthcare.

    Further, work relationship measures have been developed for use in specific health care settings, such as operating rooms and inpatient medicine. Greater integration and comparison of findings across settings would be useful; specifically, an exploration of whether certain work relationship factors are more important than others in different settings. A comparative study of instruments would be a great step in helping better understand the unique and complex nature of work relationships.

    In addition, health care workers are increasingly working with a greater diversity of team members, such as inclusion of pharmacists on primary care teams. (5) Job roles and responsibilities are also changing in response to the formation of Patient-Centered Medical Homes and Accountable Care Organizations. How well do existing models and measures for effective working relationships generalize for changes in team composition and delivery models? As such, important new opportunities and challenges exist for the development of scales for measuring work relationships in healthcare settings.

    1. Battles J, King HB. TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPC) Manual. Washington, DC: American Institute for Research, 2010
    2. Stock R, Mahoney E., Carney PA. Measuring team development in clinical care settings. Fam Med. 2013; 45(10): 691-700.
    3. Mohr DC, Benzer JK, Young GJ. Provider workload and quality of care in primary care settings: Moderating role of relational climate. Med Care 2013; 51: 108-114.
    4. Lanahm HJ, McDaniel RR Jr, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC, Tallia AF, Nutting, P. How improving practice relationships among clinicians and nonclinicians can improve the quality in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009; 35(9): 457-466.
    5. Farrell B, Warnd N, Dore N, Russell G, Geneau R, Evans S. Working in interprofessional primary health care teams: What do pharmacists do? Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013; 9(3) 288-301.

    David C. Mohr (1), Gary J. Young (1,2)
    (1) VA Boston Healthcare System, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, (2) Northeastern University Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, D'Amore-McKim School of Business and Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (23 January 2014)
    Page navigation anchor for Re: Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale
    Re: Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale
    • Michelle Howard, Assistant Professor
    • Other Contributors:

    This paper provides a succinct and validated scale measuring an important aspect of teamwork in primary care. It is interesting that one dimension was established in the instrument although the survey items appear to tap into issues of both relationships amongst people and openness to change in the work environment. Perhaps good relationships are forged through change, or people with good relationships are more willin...

    Show More

    This paper provides a succinct and validated scale measuring an important aspect of teamwork in primary care. It is interesting that one dimension was established in the instrument although the survey items appear to tap into issues of both relationships amongst people and openness to change in the work environment. Perhaps good relationships are forged through change, or people with good relationships are more willing to take on the stresses of change and improvement efforts. The association between relationships in the clinic and patient perceptions of quality of care is rarely seen in the literature, as the authors note. With the coming of patient-centred medical homes in the U.S. and similar primary care models in other countries aiming to improve outcomes for patients through interprofessional teams(1), it will be important to have rigorous measures of these unfolding processes.

    1. Rosser WW, Colwill JM, Kasperski J, Wilson L. Patient-centered medical homes in Ontario. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 21;362(3):e7

    Competing interests: ?? None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (6)
Vol. 11, Issue 6
November/December 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale
Erin P. Finley, Jacqueline A. Pugh, Holly Jordan Lanham, Luci K. Leykum, John Cornell, Poornachand Veerapaneni, Michael L. Parchman
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2013, 11 (6) 543-549; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1554

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Relationship Quality and Patient-Assessed Quality of Care in VA Primary Care Clinics: Development and Validation of the Work Relationships Scale
Erin P. Finley, Jacqueline A. Pugh, Holly Jordan Lanham, Luci K. Leykum, John Cornell, Poornachand Veerapaneni, Michael L. Parchman
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2013, 11 (6) 543-549; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1554
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Protocol for a mixed methods study of hospital readmissions: sensemaking in Veterans Health Administration healthcare system in the USA
  • Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays
  • Effects of Primary Care Team Social Networks on Quality of Care and Costs for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
  • In This Issue: Working in Community and Improving Health Care Quality
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Designing and Implementing an Electronic Health Record–Embedded Card Study in Primary Care: Methods and Considerations
  • Considerations Before Selecting a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Design for a Practice Improvement Study
  • Case Study With a Participatory Approach: Rethinking Pragmatics of Stakeholder Engagement for Implementation Research
Show more METHODOLOGY

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Mixed methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Organizational / practice change
    • Communication / decision making

Keywords

  • relationships
  • primary care
  • quality of care
  • patient satisfaction
  • Veteran’s Administration

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine