Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal ResearchA

Managing Expectations of Antibiotics for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections: A Qualitative Study

Mohammed Mustafa, Fiona Wood, Christopher C. Butler and Glyn Elwyn
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2014, 12 (1) 29-36; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1583
Mohammed Mustafa
1Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom
BSc Hons, MBChB, MRCGP, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mustafamh@cardiff.ac.uk
Fiona Wood
1Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom
MSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher C. Butler
1Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom
MBChB DCH, FRCGP, CCH, MD, FFPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glyn Elwyn
2Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
MBChB, MSc, FRCGP, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Interview Guide

    Main Topic AreaSpecific Approach
    IntroductionsExplain rationale for the study
    URTI consultationInquire how they manage the URTI consultation
    Interviewer to use open questions until satisfied participants’ comments highlight:
     Usual practice
     An understanding as to why, how, and when they elicit expectations, if at all
     The type of gambits used and why they use them
     How they structure their consultation
    Eliciting expectationsAsk for their views on eliciting expectations for antibiotics
    Consultation mapShow participants a visual aid of the consultation map and seek participants’ views on whether it is a valid representation:
     Gathering information 1: history
     Gathering information 2: examination ± commentary
     Diagnosis spin
     Management plan ± negotiating shared decision
    Wrap-upAsk if there are any questions
    Ask whether this has been an opportunity to reflect
    • URTI = upper respiratory tract infection.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Themes, Subthemes, and Codes Describing Family Physicians’ Views and Experiences of the URTI Consultation

    Main ThemeSubthemesCodes
    Family physicians’ views about managing the URTI consultation: the challenge of the consultationPrior physician expectationClinician assumption
    Preset clinician intent not to prescribe
    Recognition of evolving practice and patient culture
    Loss of discrimination between treatment options because of swine influenza
    Conflict within the consultationSituations that raise potential for conflict
    Avoiding conflict
    Negative impact of seeking patients’ views
    Minimize potential for conflict
    Delayed provision of prescription under pressure/insistence
    Delayed provision of prescription to avoid confrontation
    Prescribing to avoid complaints/confrontation
    Patients’ high expectations for antibioticsExplore reasoning when patient seeks antibiotics
    Challenge or modify antibiotic-seeking behavior
    Patients’ beliefs about antibiotics
    Delayed provision of a prescription under pressure/insistence
    Inappropriate prescribing a source of dissatisfaction/poor practice/failure
    ChallengesPatient/parent behavior with respect to social norms/culture/family
    Challenge with respect to parental anxiety
    Challenge with respect to age
    Challenge with respect to patients’ previous experiences
    Delayed provision of prescription perceived as quicker
    Delayed provision of prescription for social reasons
    Prescribe according to symptom duration
    Prescribe according to previous symptom progression
    Prescribe in cases of chronic illness
    Family physicians develop strategies to elicit and influence expectations of antibiotics: the solution to the challenging consultationThorough examinationExamination is good practice and part of physicians’ role
    Examine to justify visit
    Running commentary shares information
    Careful word choiceDiagnosis spin: minimize mismatch
    Running commentary to reassure
    Diagnosis spin: reassures, uses careful tone
    Diagnosis spin: empathetic
    Diagnosis spin: uses affirmation
    Running commentaryShares information
    Used with strategic intent
    Reassures
    Used to educate
    Means to educateURTI consultation is a means to educate
    Diagnosis spin: associate viruses with nonantibiotic management and bacteria with antibiotic management
    Antibiotics: adverse effects
    Antimicrobial resistance
    Physician refers to evidence-based medicine and guidelines
    Physician encourages autonomy
    Challenge or modify antibiotic-seeking behavior
    Physician explains distinguishing feature across consultation
    Maintain/increase physician-patient relationshipDelayed provision of prescription for social reason
    Delayed provision of prescription for physician-patient relationship
    Delayed provision of prescription for borderline cases
    Nonantibiotic prescription justifies patient visit
    Safety net
    Family physicians influenced by relational, technical, and professional factors: the goal to be a good professionalThorough examination (technical)As for “thorough examination” above
    Hedging (technical)Diagnosis spin accounts for potential for symptom progression
    Careful word choice (relational)As for “careful word choice” above
    Elicit expectations using open questions/ideas, concerns, expectations
    Means to educate (educational)As for “means to educate” above
    OrganizationalPersonal/practice pride in prescribing data
    Inappropriate prescribing as a source of dissatisfaction/poor practice/failure
    Clinicians are to blame for antimicrobial resistance/pattern of patients’ behavior
    • URTI = upper respiratory tract infection.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Summary of Themes Describing Family Physicians’ Views and Experiences of the URTI Consultation

    Main ThemeDescription, Subthemes
    Views about managing the URTI consultationThe challenges:
     Family physicians’ preset intention not to prescribe antibiotics, when feasible
     Consultation is viewed as a source of conflict
     Assumption that patients/parents expect to be given antibiotics
     Family physicians’ understanding of multiple, complex determinants of patient/parent antibiotic expectation
    Strategies to elicit and influence expectations of antibioticsThe solutions:
     Indirect elicitation of patient or parent expectation of antibiotics
     Elicit indirectly before physical examination
     Use physical examination and running commentary to shape patient or parent expectation of antibiotics
    Influence of relational, technical, and professional factorsThe goals:
     Preserve the physician-patient relationship
     Prescribe appropriately
    • URTI = upper respiratory tract infection.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Managing Expectations of Antibiotics for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections: A Qualitative Study

    Mohammed Mustafa , and colleagues

    Background A number of studies have looked at doctor visits in which antibiotics are expected by patients or parents but may not be indicated by the clinical findings. There have been few efforts, however, to ask family physicians about the ways in which they handle expectations for antibiotics. This study explores how and why family physicians elicit and address patient or parents' expectations for antibiotics in visits for upper respiratory tract infections.

    What This Study Found Family physicians prefer not to explore patient expectations for antibiotics in a direct manner or early on in visits for upper respiratory tract infections, contrary to the advice of many communications experts. Clinicians prefer more indirect methods to explore treatment expectations in an effort to avoid conflict and potential threats to the ongoing physician-patient relationship and trust. They report using open questions and building a foundation for nonantibiotic management by using strategies to indicate their reasoning and influence expectations, including running commentary on physical examination findings.

    Implications

    • The authors suggest that interventions to promote appropriate antibiotic prescribing include a focus on training in communication skills that integrates indirect methods as a part of building collaborative physician-patient relationships and uses the running commentary of examination findings to facilitate participation in clinical decisions.
  • Annals Journal Club

    Jan/Feb 2014: Managing Expectations for Antibiotics When Seeing Patients With Upper Respiratory Tract Infections


    The Annals of Family Medicine encourages readers to develop a learning community of those seeking to improve health care and health through enhanced primary care. You can participate by conducting a RADICAL journal club and sharing the results of your discussions in the Annals online discussion for the featured articles. RADICAL is an acronym for Read, Ask, Discuss, Inquire, Collaborate, Act, and Learn. The word radical also indicates the need to engage diverse participants in thinking critically about important issues affecting primary care and then acting on those discussions.1

    HOW IT WORKS

    In each issue, the Annals selects an article or articles and provides discussion tips and questions. We encourage you to take a RADICAL approach to these materials and to post a summary of your conversation in our online discussion. (Open the article online and click on "TRACK Comments: Submit a response.") You can find discussion questions and more information online at: http://www.AnnFamMed.org/site/AJC/.

    CURRENT SELECTION

    Article for Discussion

    • Mustafa M, Wood F, Butler CC, Elwyn G. Managing expectations of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(1):29-36.

    Discussion Tips

    This study uses qualitative methods to try to tap into the wisdom of experienced family physicians for their strategies to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing by managing expectations. The article presents an opportunity to develop subtlety in practice.

    Discussion Questions

    • What question is asked by this study and why does it matter?
    • How does this study advance beyond previous research and clinical practice on this topic?
    • How strong is the study design for answering the question?
    • To what degree can the findings be accounted for by the following2
      1. How participants were selected? (Did the authors achieve saturation? That is, did they sample until the point at which no new information was obtained from further sampling?)
      2. How the data were collected?
      3. Preconceptions on the part of the investigators?
      4. How the findings were analyzed and interpreted?
      5. The theoretical framework used to guide the investigation?
    • What are the main study findings?
    • How relevant is the study sample to you and your practice? Does it matter that the physicians are not a representative sample? What is your judgment about the transferability of the findings to your setting?
    • What contextual factors are important for interpreting the findings?
    • How might this study change your practice? Policy? Education? Research?
    • Who are the constituencies for the findings, and how they might be engaged in interpreting or using the findings?
    • What are the next steps in interpreting or applying the findings?
    • What researchable questions remain?

    References

    1. Stange KC, Miller WL, McLellan LA, et al. Annals Journal Club: It's time to get RADICAL. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(3):196-197.
    2. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483-488.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 12 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 12 (1)
Vol. 12, Issue 1
January/February 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Managing Expectations of Antibiotics for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections: A Qualitative Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Managing Expectations of Antibiotics for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections: A Qualitative Study
Mohammed Mustafa, Fiona Wood, Christopher C. Butler, Glyn Elwyn
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2014, 12 (1) 29-36; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1583

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Managing Expectations of Antibiotics for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections: A Qualitative Study
Mohammed Mustafa, Fiona Wood, Christopher C. Butler, Glyn Elwyn
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2014, 12 (1) 29-36; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1583
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Post-consultation acute respiratory tract infection recovery: a latent class-informed analysis of individual patient data
  • A Brief Shared Decision-Making Intervention for Acute Respiratory Infections on Antibiotic Dispensing Rates in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial
  • Optimising antimicrobial stewardship interventions in English primary care: a behavioural analysis of qualitative and intervention studies
  • Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care. Qualitative study of prescribers views
  • Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care: qualitative study of prescribers views
  • What matters when managing childhood fever in the emergency department? A discrete-choice experiment comparing the preferences of parents and healthcare professionals in the UK
  • Education as a low-value improvement intervention: often necessary but rarely sufficient
  • Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: an updated and expanded meta-ethnography
  • Ambulatory Antibiotic Stewardship through a Human Factors Engineering Approach: A Systematic Review
  • Influences on the start, selection and duration of treatment with antibiotics in long-term care facilities
  • Systematic Review of Factors Associated with Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections
  • Influence of Clinical Communication on Parents Antibiotic Expectations for Children With Respiratory Tract Infections
  • In This Issue: Team-Based Care and Information to Improve Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Acute illness
  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Personalized care
    • Relationship

Keywords

  • antibacterial agents
  • health communication
  • physician-patient relations
  • qualitative research
  • inappropriate prescribing
  • family practice
  • primary care
  • upper respiratory tract infections

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine