Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

An Early Look at Rates of Uninsured Safety Net Clinic Visits After the Affordable Care Act

Heather Angier, Megan Hoopes, Rachel Gold, Steffani R. Bailey, Erika K. Cottrell, John Heintzman, Miguel Marino and Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2015, 13 (1) 10-16; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1741
Heather Angier
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: angierh@ohsu.edu
Megan Hoopes
2OCHIN, Inc, Portland, Oregon
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Gold
2OCHIN, Inc, Portland, Oregon
3Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steffani R. Bailey
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika K. Cottrell
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
2OCHIN, Inc, Portland, Oregon
PhD, MPP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Heintzman
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miguel Marino
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer E. DeVoe
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
2OCHIN, Inc, Portland, Oregon
MD, DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Adjusted rates of uninsured visits by month among CHCs in expansion and nonexpansion states.

    ACA = Affordable Care Act; CHC = community health center.

    Notes: Rates calculated per 1,000 adult patients across entire study period. Poisson general estimating equation (GEE) model adjusted for percent of patients aged younger than 40 years and percent Hispanic, accounting for temporal correlation within CHCs over time.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Adjusted visit rates by coverage status and month among CHCs in expansion and nonexpansion states.

    ACA = Affordable Care Act; CHC = community health center.

    Notes: Rates calculated per 1,000 adult patients across entire study period. Poisson general estimating equation (GEE) model adjusted for percent nonwhite race, percent Hispanic, percent ≤138% federal poverty level (FPL), and percent with unknown FPL; models account for temporal correlation within CHCs over time.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Characteristics of States, CHCs, and Encounter Rates Before and After Medicaid Expansion

    Expansion States8Nonexpansion States8
    CharacteristicCAMNOHORWATotalAKINMTNCTotal
    State-level factors
    Adult Medicaid eligibility,a pre-22/post-8 expansion period, % of FPL106/138215/20596/13839/13871/138–78/12824/2454/5447/45–
    Minimum wage, 2014,19 $/hr8.007.257.959.109.32–7.507.257.907.25–
    Unemployment rate, 2014,20 %7.64.65.56.96.1–6.45.74.66.4–
    Adult uninsured rate, 2013,21 %21.69.513.919.416.8–18.915.320.720.4–
    Insurance marketplace23StateStateFederalStatebState–FederalFederalFederalFederal–
    OCHIN CHC characteristics
    Primary care CHCs, No.29414855137195419
    Total patients, 2013–June 2014, No.91,2827,91230,422156,44014,571300,356c2,19810,2449,01411,86133,315c
    Female sex, No. (%)54,890(60.1)4,477 (56.6)18,045 (59.3)93,620 (59.8)8,819 (60.5)179,675 (59.8)d1,221 (55.6)6,700 (65.4)5,265 (58.4)7,004 (59.1)20,188 (60.6)
    Age-group, as of last visit, No. (%)
     19 to 25 y12,356 (13.5)1,318 (16.7)5,466 (18.0)23,078 (14.8)2,202 (15.1)44,386 (14.8)d347 (15.8)1,469 (14.3)1,876 (20.8)1,269 (10.7)4,961 (14.9)
     26 to 39 y29,037 (31.8)2,920 (36.9)10,052 (33.0)52,389 (33.5)4,696 (32.2)99,000 (33.0)760 (34.6)3,091 (30.2)2,569 (28.5)2,683 (22.6)9,102 (27.3)
     40 to 64 y49,889 (54.7)3,674 (46.4)14,904 (49.0)80,973 (51.8)7,673 (52.7)156,970 (52.3)1,091 (49.6)5,684 (55.5)4,569 (50.7)7,909 (66.7)19,252 (57.8)
    Household income, No. (%)
     ≤138 % of FPL60,107 (65.8)5,415 (68.4)24,214 (79.6)114,117 (72.9)11,338 (77.8)214,958 (71.6)d718 (32.7)7,507 (73.3)5,431 (60.3)5,410 (45.6)19,066 (57.2)
     >138 % of FPL11,416 (12.5)523 (6.6)2,962 (9.7)24,645 (15.8)3,118 (21.4)42,628 (14.2)1,016 (46.2)1,038 (10.1)2,181 (24.2)2,822 (23.8)7,055 (21.2)
     Missing/unknown19,759 (21.6)1,974 (24.9)3,246 (10.7)17,678 (11.3)115 (0.8)42,770 (14.2)464 (21.1)1,699 (16.6)1,402 (15.6)3,629 (30.6)7,194 (21.6)
    Nonwhite race, No. (%)7,914 (8.7)6,191 (78.2)15,365 (50.5)14,709 (9.4)1,033 (7.1)45,192 (15.0)d647 (29.4)5,704 (55.7)332 (3.7)6,783 (57.2)13,466 (40.4)
    Hispanic ethnicity, No. (%)41,999 (46.0)125 (1.6)4,331 (14.2)38,243 (24.4)1,472 (10.1)86,145 (28.7)d227 (10.3)1,041 (10.2)336 (3.7)491 (4.1)2,095 (6.3)
    Urban residence, No. (%)88,368 (96.8)7,841 (99.1)30,410(100.0)147,320(94.2)13,518 (92.8)287,204 (95.6)d2,172 (98.8)10,195 (99.5)8,083 (89.7)8,886 (74.9)29,335 (88.1)
    Adjustede visit RRs, postexpansion period vs preexpansion periodf
    Total visits, RR (95% CI)0.99 (0.93–1.05)1.05 (1.03–1.08)g1.02 (0.94–1.10)1.07 (1.03–1.11)g1.34 (1.00–1.79)1.05 (1.01–1.08)g0.94h0.99 (0.76–1.28)0.94 (0.85–1.05)0.93 (0.80–1.08)0.95 (0.87–1.04)
    Uninsured visits, RR (95% CI)0.92 (0.78–1.09)0.75 (0.65–0.87)g0.82 (0.71–0.94)g0.51 (0.45–0.59)g0.64 (0.54–0.75)g0.60 (0.54–0.67)g0.84h0.88 (0.68–1.14)0.83 (0.78–0.88)g0.78 (0.57–1.07)0.84 (0.74–0.95)g
    Medicaid visits, RR (95% CI)1.03 (0.94–1.12)1.11 (1.03–1.19)g1.17 (1.07–1.29)g1.78 (1.60–1.98)g2.04 (1.39–2.99)g1.36 (1.24–1.49)g1.07h1.18 (0.86–1.62)1.03 (1.00–1.07)0.96 (0.81–1.12)1.05 (0.94–1.18)
    Commercially insured visits, RR (95% CI)1.08 (0.92–1.27)0.99 (0.90–1.09)1.22 (1.09–1.37)g0.96 (0.89–1.05)1.03 (0.84–1.27)1.02 (0.94–1.09)0.96h1.20 (0.89–1.61)1.01 (0.82–1.24)1.03 (0.99–1.06)1.03 (0.96–1.11)
    • AK= Alaska; CA = California; CHC = community health center; FPL = federal poverty level; GEE = generalized estimating equation; IN = Indiana; MN = Minnesota; MT= Montana; NC = North Carolina; OCHIN = formerly the Oregon Community Health Information Network; OH = Ohio; OR= Oregon; RR = rate ratio; WA = Washington.

    • ↵a Eligibility FPL levels may differ between adults with children and without, or those who are working and those who are jobless. The number reported indicates the highest FPL limit for open full Medicaid coverage in a given state among these categories.

    • ↵b Because of problems with its state exchange rollout, Oregon opted to switch to the federal exchange in mid-2014.

    • ↵c Expansion group numbers may not sum because an individual patient can have visits in more than 1 state.

    • ↵d Overall percentage differs significantly between expansion states and nonexpansion states by χ2 test (P < .001).

    • ↵e Rates by state: Poisson GEE model adjusted for CHC-level factors (percent female, percent younger than age 40 years, percent nonwhite, percent Hispanic, percent ≤138% FPL, percent with unknown FPL, percent urban). Rates by expansion status: Poisson GEE model adjusted for all CHC-level factors plus state-level factors (2014 minimum wage, 2014 unemployment rate, 2013 adult uninsurance rate). All GEE models accounted for temporal correlation over time within CHCs.

    • ↵f Preexpansion period: January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013; postexpansion period: January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2014.

    • ↵g RR is significantly different from 1.0.

    • ↵h CI cannot be computed because Alaska had only 1 CHC in the sample.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    An Early Look at Rates of Uninsured Safety Net Clinic Visits After the Affordable Care Act

    Heather Angier , and colleagues

    Background The Affordable Care Act supports significant expansions in Medicaid coverage in the United States. This study explores the number of patient visits to uninsured safety net clinics in states that implemented Medicaid expansion compared with states that did not expand Medicaid.

    What This Study Found Medicaid expansions appear to have successfully decreased the number of uninsured safety net patients in the US. Community health centers in states that expanded Medicaid had a 40 percent decrease in the rate of uninsured visits and a 36 percent increase in the rate of Medicaid-covered visits. In contrast, clinics in non-expansion states had a 16 percent decline in the rate of uninsured visits but no change in the rate of Medicaid-covered visits.

    Implications

    • This study confirms other reports showing increased health insurance coverage rates following state Medicaid expansion and adds new information demonstrating a measurable effect on community health center visits in Medicaid expansion states.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (1)
Vol. 13, Issue 1
January/February 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Early Look at Rates of Uninsured Safety Net Clinic Visits After the Affordable Care Act
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
An Early Look at Rates of Uninsured Safety Net Clinic Visits After the Affordable Care Act
Heather Angier, Megan Hoopes, Rachel Gold, Steffani R. Bailey, Erika K. Cottrell, John Heintzman, Miguel Marino, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 13 (1) 10-16; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1741

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
An Early Look at Rates of Uninsured Safety Net Clinic Visits After the Affordable Care Act
Heather Angier, Megan Hoopes, Rachel Gold, Steffani R. Bailey, Erika K. Cottrell, John Heintzman, Miguel Marino, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 13 (1) 10-16; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1741
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Health Care Expenditures Among Adults With Diabetes After Oregons Medicaid Expansion
  • Impact of Alternative Payment Methodology on Primary Care Visits and Scheduling
  • Following Uninsured Patients Through Medicaid Expansion: Ambulatory Care Use and Diagnosed Conditions
  • The Impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid Expansion on Visit Rates for Diabetes in Safety Net Health Centers
  • Implementation of Health Insurance Support Tools in Community Health Centers
  • Uninsured Primary Care Visit Disparities Under the Affordable Care Act
  • At Federally Funded Health Centers, Medicaid Expansion Was Associated With Improved Quality Of Care
  • Medicaid Expansion And Grant Funding Increases Helped Improve Community Health Center Capacity
  • After Medicaid Expansion In Kentucky, Use Of Hospital Emergency Departments For Dental Conditions Increased
  • Community Health Center Use After Oregon's Randomized Medicaid Experiment
  • In This Issue: Policy and Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
  • Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access

Keywords

  • safety net clinics
  • uninsured
  • Affordable Care Act
  • practice-based research
  • primary care

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine