Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

Recommendations for a Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home

Roberta E. Goldman, Donna R. Parker, Joanna Brown, Judith Walker, Charles B. Eaton and Jeffrey M. Borkan
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2015, 13 (2) 168-175; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1765
Roberta E. Goldman
Department of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Roberta_Goldman@brown.edu
Donna R. Parker
Department of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
ScD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanna Brown
Department of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith Walker
Department of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles B. Eaton
Department of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey M. Borkan
Department of Family Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Quantitative PCMH Evaluation Measures: Practice, Clinician, and Staff Survey Instruments

    Measurement ToolDomainsSource, Version, Purpose, Availability
    Baseline Practice Survey45Demographics and practice informationOriginal NDP questionnaire (96 items). Adapted questionnaire by BPCTI (27 items). Provides information for NCQA and meaningful use. No cost
    Supplemental Appendix 1, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    PCMH Implementation Survey45,46Change capacity: teamwork, work environment, culture, trust, communicationModified by BPCTI from 2 longer NDP scales: NDP Practice Adaptive Reserve (23 items), Modified Scale = 23 items (reflection item deleted and confidence item added), and Practice Environmental Checklist (123 items). Combined modified scale = 32 items. No cost
    Supplemental Appendix 2, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    Practice Demographic Questionnaire for cliniciansDemographics of individual practice cliniciansBPCTI (9 items). For physicians, NPs, and PAs. No cost
    Supplemental Appendix 3, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    Practice Demographic Questionnaire for staffDemographics of individual practice staffBPCTI (5 items). For nurses, medical assistants, receptionists, and other staff. No cost
    Supplemental Appendix 4, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    The Clinician Activation Measure assessment (CS-PAM)Clinician support for and beliefs about patient activation and patient self-managementValidated tool from Insignia Health (13 items). Requires purchase of a license
    http://www.insigniahealth.com/solutions/clinician-activation-measure
    Maslach Burnout Inventory47Measure of burnout: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishmentMBI-HSS (22 items). For clinicians and staff. Available in 25 languages, free with purchase of license for English version. Website disclaimer gives no warranty for translation quality
    http://www.mindgarden.com/products/mbi.htm
    • BPCTI = Brown Primary Care Transformation Initiative; MBI = Maslach Burnout Inventory; MBI-HSS = MBI-Human Services Survey; NCQA = National Center for Quality Assurance; NDP = National Demonstration Project; NP = nurse practitioner; PA = physician assistant; PCMH = patient-centered medical home.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Quantitative PCMH Evaluation Measures: Patient Survey Instruments

    Measurement ToolDomainsSource, Version, Purpose, Availability
    Patient Activation Measure (PAM)Patient activation regarding patients’ knowledge, skills, and confidence for self-managementValidated tool from Insignia Health (13 items) to inform patient activation efforts English and Spanish. Requires purchase of a license
    http://www.insigniahealth.com/solutions/patient-activation-measure
    HRSA Patient Satisfaction SurveyAdult experiences of care at the practiceHRSA (32 items). English and Spanish. No cost. HRSA version 12/25/2012
    Supplemental Appendix 5, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    Interpersonal Process of Care Survey: Short Form (IPC-18)Communication, patient-centered decision making, and interpersonal styleUniversity of California, San Francisco Department of Medicine, Center for Aging in Diverse Communities (18-item short form). For patients from diverse racial/ethnic groups to describe disparities in interpersonal care, predict patient outcomes, and examine outcomes disparity reduction efforts. English and Spanish. No cost
    http://dgim.ucsf.edu/cadc/mm/ipcare.html
    • HRSA = Health Resources and Services Administration; PCMH = patient-centered medical home.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Quantitative PCMH Evaluation Measures: Examples of Meta-Measures

    Measurement ToolDomainsSource, Version, Purpose, Availability
    Physician Practice Connections – Patient-Centered Medical Home (PPC-PCMH)9 Standards: access and communication, patient tracking and registry functions, care management, self-management support, electronic prescribing, test tracking, referral tracking, performance reporting and improvement, advanced electronic communicationNCQA revised standards for January 1, 2014. Most commonly used measure of PCMH accreditation
    http://www.ncqa.org/Programs/Recognition/Practices/PatientCenteredMedicalHomePCMH.aspx
    Meaningful Use3 Core areas: data capture and sharing, advancing clinical processes, achieving improved patient outcomesStandards defined by the CMS Incentive Programs to regulate use of electronic health records. Eligible providers and hospitals earn incentive payments by meeting criteria
    http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Meaningful_Use.html
    Medical Home Implementation Quotient (MHIQ)9 Modules: patient-centered medical home, practice management, health information technology, quality and safety, practice-based team care, care coordination, practice-based services, access to care and information, care managementTransforMED. Self-assessment tool to help a practice learn more about the medical home model and gauge status within the medical home continuum
    http://www.transformed.com/mhiq/welcome.cfm
    Patient-Centered Medical Home Assessment (PCMH-A)8 Change concept areas: engaged leadership, quality improvement strategy, empanelment, continuous team-based healing relationships, organized, evidence-based care, patient-centered interactions, enhanced access, care coordinationMacColl Center for Healthcare Innovation. Helps practices gauge progress implementing PCMH change concepts. Tested by 65 sites participating in the Safety Net Medical Home Initiative
    http://bsmod.dom.wustl.edu/documents/PCMH-A_SNMHI_080410.pdf
    • CMS = Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; NCQA = National Committee for Quality Assurance; PCMH = patient-centered medical home.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Hospital Utilization Measures

    Hospital admissions per 1,000 members
    Ambulatory care–sensitive conditions admissions per 1,000 members
    Emergency department visits per 1,000 members
    Avoidable emergency visits (ambulatory care–sensitive admissions per 1,000 members)
    Hospital readmissions within 30 days
    • View popup
    Table 5

    Examples of Clinical Benchmark Categories

    Adult measurement category examples
     Comprehensive diabetes care
     Tobacco use assessment and counseling
     Hypertension control
     Breast cancer screening
     Cervical cancer screening
     Colorectal cancer screening
     Depression screening and treatment
     Weight, BMI screening
     Asthma treatment
     Cholesterol management
    Pediatric measurement category examples
     Well-child checks
     Immunizations
     Developmental screening
     BMI measurement and classification
     Patients with persistent asthma on controller medication
     Screening for chlamydia in sexually active adolescent girls
     Oral health risk assessment
     Hearing and vision checks
     Lead screening
    • BMI = body mass index.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    PCMH Qualitative Observational Evaluation Methods

    MethodDomainsSource, Version, Purpose, Availability
    Direct observation within the practice environment (example: medical practice waiting room observation guide)Examples: use of space, people flow, and interpersonal interactions in waiting rooms, nurses’ stations and other back areas; décor and tone of each area; communication among clinicians, staff, and patientsBPCTI. Participant observation sessions conducted throughout the practice at varying times and days of the week Flexibly structured field note template
    Supplemental Appendix 6, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    Pathway observations with staffStaff experience of work. Observe work tasks and workflow for specific staff person and during interactions with coworkers: type of tasks, redundancy, efficiency, demeanor, behaviors, interactionsBPCTI. Observation template guide
    Supplemental Appendix 7, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    Pathway observations with adult and pediatric patientsPatient (or parent or guardian) experience of visit. Observe workflow, patient data collection, confidentiality procedures, observation of clinician and staff communication with patient, parent, or guardian, time duration for visit segmentsBPCTI. Observation template guide. Researcher takes notes while accompanying patients from check-in through checkout. Informal interviewing during wait times
    Supplemental Appendix 8, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    • BPCTI = Brown Primary Care Transformation Initiative; PCMH = patient-centered medical home.

    • View popup
    Table 7

    PCMH Qualitative Interview Evaluation Methods

    MethodDomainsSource, Version, Purpose, Availability
    Used with clinicians and staff
     Individual baseline interviews with clinicians and staffRole description, perspective of and experience working in practice, teamwork, conflict resolution, change processes, goals for changeBPCTI (20 core open-ended questions). In-person or telephone interview conducted with physicians, NPs, PAs, nurses, medical assistants, receptionists, and other staff.
    Supplemental Appendix 9, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
     Follow-up interviews with clinicians, PCMH practice champions, and staffPerceptions of transformation progress, vision of practice as a PCMH, roles in transformation efforts, communication, patient engagement, changes in interpersonal interactionsBPCTI (19 core open-ended questions). In-person or telephone interview conducted with physicians, NPs and PAs, nurses, medical assistants, receptionists, and other staff.
    Supplemental Appendix 10, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    Used with patients
     Individual adult patient interviewsPatient’s experience and opinions about the practice, cognizance of practice transformation, understanding of PCMHBPCTI (12 core open-ended questions). In-person interview conducted with patients aged >18 y.
    Supplemental Appendix 11, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    Individual or pair: parent or guardian and pediatric patient interviewsParent and child’s experience and opinions about the practice, cognizance of practice transformation, understanding of PCMHBPCTI (14 core open-ended questions). In-person interview conducted with parent or guardian alone, parent-child pair if child is capable of participating, or child alone if child is capable of speaking completely for him/herself.
    Supplemental Appendix 12, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    • BPCTI = Brown Primary Care Transformation Initiative; NP = nurse practitioner; PA = physician assistant; PCMH = patient-centered medical home.

    • View popup
    Table 8

    PCMH Implementation Process Evaluation Methods

    MethodDomainsSource, Version, Purpose, Availability
    Written reflections and progress notesFacilitation staff document the changing contextual circumstances in the practices, in the broader environment, and in their own facilitation rolesBPCTI (5 trigger questions). Facilitation staff keep an ongoing typed log of reflections
    Supplemental Appendix 13, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    Focus groupsModerated group discussions about enabling factors and barriers to achieving evaluation or facilitation goals, how staff roles and relationships with practices evolved and the impact of this evolution, and notions about how and why the practices are or are not transforming in specific domainsBPCTI (4 core questions about evaluation data collection; 22 core questions about transformation facilitation)
    Supplemental Appendix 14, http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/2/168/suppl/DC1
    • BPCTI = Brown Primary Care Transformation Initiative; PCMH = patient-centered medical home.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendixes 1-14

    PDF files. Last file listed is all 14 appendixes in a single PDF file.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendix 1 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 10 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 11 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 12 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 13 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 14 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendixes 1-14 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 2 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 3 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 4 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 5 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 6 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 7 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 8 - PDF file
    • Supplemental data: Appendix 9 - PDF file
  • The Article in Brief

    Recommendations for a Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home

    Roberta E. Goldman , and colleagues

    Background The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) is intended to transform primary care practices by combining the best primary care attributes with new ways of structuring and coordinating care, engaging patients, improving health outcomes, providing a better patient experience, improving efficiency and use of health information technology, and reducing costs. This study develops a methodology for identifying how and why transformation occurs in primary care practices.

    What This Study Found PCMH evaluation must be comprehensive enough to assess and explain the context of transformation in different primary care practices and the experiences of diverse stakeholders. The methods and measures proposed in this study are intended to be used together and include survey instruments, PCMH meta-measures, patient outcomes, quality measures, qualitative interviews, participant observation, and process evaluation.

    Implications

    • This approach, the authors conclude, can foster insights about how transformation affects critical outcomes to achieve meaningful, patient-centered, high-quality, and cost-effective sustainable change among diverse primary care practices. These insights, in turn, can inform recommendations for practice facilitation that can most effectively achieve the goals of the PCMH model.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (2)
Vol. 13, Issue 2
March/April 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recommendations for a Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Recommendations for a Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home
Roberta E. Goldman, Donna R. Parker, Joanna Brown, Judith Walker, Charles B. Eaton, Jeffrey M. Borkan
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2015, 13 (2) 168-175; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1765

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Recommendations for a Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home
Roberta E. Goldman, Donna R. Parker, Joanna Brown, Judith Walker, Charles B. Eaton, Jeffrey M. Borkan
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2015, 13 (2) 168-175; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1765
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Developing a reporting item checklist for studies of HIV drug resistance prevalence or incidence: a mixed methods study
  • Resolving Rivalries and Realigning Goals: Challenges of Clinical and Research Multiteam Systems
  • In This Issue: Developing and Amplifying the Effectiveness of the Primary Care Workforce
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study
  • Patient-Guided Tours: A Patient-Centered Methodology to Understand Patient Experiences of Health Care
  • Putting Evidence Into Practice: An Update on the US Preventive Services Task Force Methods for Developing Recommendations for Preventive Services
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Mixed methods
  • Other topics:
    • Patient-centered medical home
    • Research capacity building

Keywords

  • patient-centered medical home
  • evaluation
  • practice transformation
  • context
  • mixed methods
  • qualitative methods
  • quantitative methods

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine