Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology

Split-Session Focus Group Interviews in the Naturalistic Setting of Family Medicine Offices

Michael D. Fetters, Timothy C. Guetterman, Debra Power and Donald E. Nease
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2016, 14 (1) 70-75; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1881
Michael D. Fetters
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
MD, MPH, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mfetters@umich.edu
Timothy C. Guetterman
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra Power
2Power Marketing Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
BA, BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald E. Nease Jr
3Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Useful approach
    David L. Morgan
    Published on: 25 February 2016
  • Published on: (25 February 2016)
    Page navigation anchor for Useful approach
    Useful approach
    • David L. Morgan, Professor

    I thought this was a useful approach to a perennial issue in focus groups: how to deal with heterogeneity. Of course, that problem is magnified when the difference between the categories of participants also involves hierarchy or power differentials.

    In particular, I liked the idea of starting with a joint presentation followed by an alternation between the two "segments." I also appreciated the practicality of...

    Show More

    I thought this was a useful approach to a perennial issue in focus groups: how to deal with heterogeneity. Of course, that problem is magnified when the difference between the categories of participants also involves hierarchy or power differentials.

    In particular, I liked the idea of starting with a joint presentation followed by an alternation between the two "segments." I also appreciated the practicality of doing this in an office setting, where the office could retain much of its functioning by having portions of the staff available while the others were participating in a group. I could easily imagine this kind of alternation as a practical approach in a variety of organizational settings, regardless of whether heterogeneity was an issue.

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 14 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 14 (1)
Vol. 14, Issue 1
January/February 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Split-Session Focus Group Interviews in the Naturalistic Setting of Family Medicine Offices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Split-Session Focus Group Interviews in the Naturalistic Setting of Family Medicine Offices
Michael D. Fetters, Timothy C. Guetterman, Debra Power, Donald E. Nease
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2016, 14 (1) 70-75; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1881

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Split-Session Focus Group Interviews in the Naturalistic Setting of Family Medicine Offices
Michael D. Fetters, Timothy C. Guetterman, Debra Power, Donald E. Nease
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2016, 14 (1) 70-75; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1881
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In This Issue: Size Matters
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study
  • Patient-Guided Tours: A Patient-Centered Methodology to Understand Patient Experiences of Health Care
  • Putting Evidence Into Practice: An Update on the US Preventive Services Task Force Methods for Developing Recommendations for Preventive Services
Show more Methodology

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Research capacity building
    • Communication / decision making

Keywords

  • focus groups
  • qualitative research
  • research methodology
  • research design
  • clinical study
  • family practice
  • primary health care

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine