Article Figures & Data
Tables
Step Comment 1. Conduct a joint session with both physicians and staff members Some aspects of project implementation required a joint discussion with all staff and physicians present
Questioning is focused on aspects of the system that would affect both parties2. Dismiss staff so they can prepare for patients Staff members are able to follow regular practice workflow
Physicians can be interviewed without staff present and make comments about potentially sensitive staff issues without concerns about offending anyone3. Interview physicians only While staff are preparing patients, physicians often have relative down time
Aspects affecting only the physicians could be asked and discussed efficiently without staff being onlookers4. Dismiss physicians to resume clinical care Physicians can complete patient care as usual and even extend into the noon hour without disruption to the usual work schedule 5. Interview staff only when patient care is completed (eg, before, during, or after lunch) In the usual workflow, staff complete preparing patients for physicians and are available for noon-time discussions
With physicians out of the room, staff may be more comfortable stating opinions about implementation that they might otherwise feel too inhibited to voice if their employer were presentSessiona Participants Activity Comment 1 Staff and physicians Role play followed by short question and answer for general issues Joint whole-group format allows general exposure, understanding, and questions 2 Physicians only Focus group interview: physician-specific issues are addressed Provides staff time to prepare patients for physician clinical care 3 Staff only Focus group interview: staff-specific issues are addressed Staff often finish early, while physicians often run late; focus group interview is more convenient with staff during their lunch break while still leaving some time for lunch ↵a Each session lasts 30 minutes. Third session takes place during lunch break.
Note: With the morning-start format shown, the procedure begins before patients arrive in the morning and ends during lunchtime. An alternate lunch-start format is described in Results.
- Table 3
Advantages and Disadvantages of Focus Group Interviews in Naturalistic Settings and Neutral Settings
Setting Advantages Disadvantages Naturalistic Convenience for participants
Participant comfort in the setting
Immersion in environmental stimuli and setting, allowing for consideration of application of the proposed technologic intervention in their office
Simple payment mechanism: office receives lump sum for participationPotential distraction by impending work to be done when focus group interview completed
Possible reluctance to criticize own office’s procedures
Potential lack of space in practice to hold sessions
Compensation to the practice may have limited benefit for office staffNeutral Lack of distraction by environmental stimuli
Lack of distraction by immediacy of the time clock
Potential sense of security in voicing opinion, especially if negative, about the system under investigation
Freedom to use the participation incentive as desiredNeed to travel to the location chosen for session
Expectation that staff members will use their lunch time to participate - Table 4
Advantages and Disadvantages of Split-Session Focus Groups and Traditional Focus Groups
Focus Group Approach Advantages Disadvantages Split session Fits into existing practice workflow
Generates dialog and interaction among the full group
Allows gathering of data from distinct subgroups having different perspectives
Permits staff and physicians to speak freely without the other present
Allows recruitment of more participants for each session
Nets an overall cost savingsRequires that practice must be willing to accommodate focus group interviews at their location
Necessitates a conference room, waiting room, or other suitable area be available on site to conduct sessions
Limits time with subgroups, which may yield less rich dataTraditional (unsplit) Allows ability to conduct multiple groups at one time
Enables bringing together participants from multiple practices at onceYields lower participation rates
Requires participants to travel to location
May constrain staff and physicians from speaking freely when other is present
May require additional incentives
Additional Files
The Article in Brief
Split-Session Focus Group Interviews in the Naturalistic Setting of Family Medicine Offices
Michael D. Fetters , and colleagues
Background When recruiting health care professionals to participate in focus group interviews, investigators encounter many challenges, including busy clinic schedules, recruitment, and getting candid responses from diverse participants. To address these challenges, researchers developed a split-session method for conducting focus groups in the practice setting.
What This Study Found In split-session focus groups, time is divided between sessions with the entire group and with subgroups. This format provides flexibility for researchers to collect data in the office setting while accommodating a practice's workflow needs as much as possible.
Implications
- Holding focus group interviews in the practice could increase rates of participation of both physicians and practice staff.
- Split-session focus group interviews allow efficiency and a greater degree of tailoring interview questions to subgroups.