Research ArticleMethodology
Measuring Patient Safety in Primary Care: The Development and Validation of the “Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care” (PREOS-PC)
Ignacio Ricci-Cabello, Anthony J. Avery, David Reeves, Umesh T. Kadam and Jose M. Valderas
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2016, 14 (3) 253-261; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1935
Ignacio Ricci-Cabello
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
PhDAnthony J. Avery
2Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
PhDDavid Reeves
3Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
PhDUmesh T. Kadam
4Arthritis Primary Care Research Centre, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom
5Health Services Research Unit, Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom
PhDJose M. Valderas
6Health Services & Policy Research Group, Patient Centred Care, University of Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
PhDPublished eLetters
If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.
Submit a Response to This Article
Jump to comment:
No eLetters have been published for this article.
In this issue
The Annals of Family Medicine: 14 (3)
Vol. 14, Issue 3
May/June 2016
Measuring Patient Safety in Primary Care: The Development and Validation of the “Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care” (PREOS-PC)
Ignacio Ricci-Cabello, Anthony J. Avery, David Reeves, Umesh T. Kadam, Jose M. Valderas
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2016, 14 (3) 253-261; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1935
Measuring Patient Safety in Primary Care: The Development and Validation of the “Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care” (PREOS-PC)
Ignacio Ricci-Cabello, Anthony J. Avery, David Reeves, Umesh T. Kadam, Jose M. Valderas
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2016, 14 (3) 253-261; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1935
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Filling a gap in safety metrics: development of a patient-centred framework to identify and categorise patient-reported breakdowns related to the diagnostic process in ambulatory care
- Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire
- How do patients respond to safety problems in ambulatory care? Results of a retrospective cross-sectional telephone survey
- Patient safety in ambulatory care from the patient's perspective: a retrospective, representative telephone survey
- Development and evaluation of an intervention based on the provision of patient feedback to improve patient safety in Spanish primary healthcare centres: study protocol
- Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Investigating the feasibility of a patient feedback tool to improve safety in Australian primary care: a study protocol
- Validation of the Primary Care Patient Measure of Safety (PC PMOS) questionnaire
- Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patients perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain
- Development and piloting of a survey to estimate the frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from a UK patients perspective
- Identifying patient and practice characteristics associated with patient-reported experiences of safety problems and harm: a cross-sectional study using a multilevel modelling approach
- Patients evaluations of patient safety in English general practices: a cross-sectional study
- Patient-reported safety incidents in older patients with long-term conditions: a large cross-sectional study
- In This Issue: Decisions, Decisions