Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Brief

Maternal Preferences for Vitamin D Supplementation in Breastfed Infants

Puja J. Umaretiya, Sara S. Oberhelman, Elizabeth W. Cozine, Julie A. Maxson, Stephanie M. Quigg and Tom D. Thacher
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2017, 15 (1) 68-70; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2016
Puja J. Umaretiya
1Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
3Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara S. Oberhelman
2Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth W. Cozine
2Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie A. Maxson
2Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie M. Quigg
2Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom D. Thacher
2Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: thacher.thomas@mayo.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Maternal and Infant Characteristics (n = 184)

    CharacteristicValue
    Age of infant, No. (%)
     <2 mo11 (6.0)
     2–3.9 mo112 (60.9)
     4–5.9 mo61 (33.2)
    Race, No. (%)
     White175 (95.1)
     Asian9 (4.9)
     Hispanic5 (2.7)
     Black or African American3 (1.6)
     American Indian/Alaskan Native2 (1.1)
    First-time mothers, No. (%)73 (40.1)
    Number of children, median (range)2 (1–8)
    Practice location, No. (%)
     Urban108 (58.7)
     Suburban70 (38.0)
     Rural7 (3.8)
    Feeding characteristics
     Breast milk only, No. (%)140 (76.1)
     Breast milk and formula, No. (%)44 (23.9)
     Supplementing infant with vitamin D, No. (%)101 (55.2)
     Age when infant began supplementation, median (range), wk2 (0–17)
     Mother taking supplement with vitamin D, No. (%)138 (75.8)
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Maternal Reasons for Not Supplementing Infants With Vitamin D

    ThemesQuotes
    Lack of knowledge about supplementation“I didn’t know I should”
    “Too young – will start soon”
    “Never even knew vitamin D supplementation was needed”
    Assumption that fortified milk provides infant with needed vitamin D“I gave vitamin D supplement when she was breast milk-fed, provider told us to discontinue when formula started”
    “My baby went to exclusive soy formula at 2 months old, which has vitamin D supplement”
    “Baby formula has all that is needed and recommended”
    “Stopped giving it when I stopped nursing and started to give formula”
    Assumption that breast milk provides infant with needed nutrition“Find it hard to believe the whole population is so deficient in Vitamin D, especially in breast milk”
    “I feel like my breast milk was designed by God to give my baby what she needs. Babies have been fine and healthy without Vitamin D supplementation for generations”
    Inconvenience/Dislike“It causes her to spit up”
    “I forget to because she doesn’t take it well and doesn’t seem to like the taste”

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Maternal Preferences for Vitamin D Supplementation in Breastfed Infants

    Tom D. Thacher , and colleagues

    Background Although daily vitamin D supplementation is recommended for breastfed infants, adherence to this recommendation is poor. This study explores mothers' preferences for vitamin D supplementation.

    What This Study Found Less than one-half of infants in the study received the recommended daily vitamin D supplementation. Given a choice, most mothers prefer to supplement themselves to enrich their breast milk with vitamin D rather than supplement their infants. Among 140 mothers with exclusively breastfed infants and 44 who used both breast milk and formula milk, 55 percent supplemented their infants with vitamin D, and 42 percent supplemented with the 400 IU recommended. Eighty-eight percent of mothers preferred supplementing themselves rather than their infants, and 57 percent preferred daily to monthly supplementation. Mothers cited safety as most important in choosing a method of supplementation.

    Implications

    • Taking mothers' preferences into consideration could improve adequate intake of vitamin D in breastfed infants. Because most mothers take a prenatal vitamin after delivery, higher doses of vitamin D (4000-6400 IU daily) could be incorporated into their supplementation routine.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (1)
Vol. 15, Issue 1
January/February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Maternal Preferences for Vitamin D Supplementation in Breastfed Infants
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Maternal Preferences for Vitamin D Supplementation in Breastfed Infants
Puja J. Umaretiya, Sara S. Oberhelman, Elizabeth W. Cozine, Julie A. Maxson, Stephanie M. Quigg, Tom D. Thacher
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 15 (1) 68-70; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Maternal Preferences for Vitamin D Supplementation in Breastfed Infants
Puja J. Umaretiya, Sara S. Oberhelman, Elizabeth W. Cozine, Julie A. Maxson, Stephanie M. Quigg, Tom D. Thacher
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 15 (1) 68-70; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Infant and Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation: Clinician Perspectives and Practices
  • In This Issue: Powerful Ideas for Action
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Genital Tucking Practices in Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients
  • Update to Gabapentinoid Use in the United States, 2002-2021
  • Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
Show more Research Brief

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Children's health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Communication / decision making
    • Patient perspectives

Keywords

  • infant
  • breast feeding
  • decision making, shared
  • vitamin D deficiency, prevention & control

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine