Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Bridging the Gaps Between Patients and Primary Care in China: A Nationwide Representative Survey

William C. W. Wong, Sunfang Jiang, Jason J. Ong, Minghui Peng, Eric Wan, Shanzhu Zhu, Cindy L. K. Lam, Michael R. Kidd and Martin Roland
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2017, 15 (3) 237-245; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2034
William C. W. Wong
1Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sunfang Jiang
2General Practice Department, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wongwcw@hku.hk
Jason J. Ong
3Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minghui Peng
2General Practice Department, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Wan
1Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shanzhu Zhu
2General Practice Department, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cindy L. K. Lam
1Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Kidd
4Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
5Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia
AM, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Roland
6Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Distribution of community health centers surveyed across China.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    General Characteristics of the CHCs (N = 149)

    CharacteristicValue
    Population size, median (IQR)
     Catchment area50,000 (30,000–96,000)
     Migrant population11,100 (5,000–30,000)
    Days open per week, median (IQR)7 (7–7)
    Patient visits in 2014, median No. (IQR)41,100 (12,000–16,360)
    Age of patients, mean (SD), y49.9 (11.1)
    Male-female ratio of patients, median (IQR)1 (0.7–1.3)
    Patients seen each day, median No. (IQR)70 (28–200)
    Patients seen each day by physicians, mean No. (%)
     <1061 (44.5)
     10–19.927 (19.7)
     20–39.930 (21.9)
     ≥4019 (13.9)
    Physicians available each day, median No. (IQR)
     All physicians7 (4–12)
     Trained in western medicine5 (2–10)
     Trained in traditional Chinese medicine2 (1–4)
     Specialists2 (1–4)
    Appointments can be made in advance, % (95% CI)62 (54–70)
    Origin of CHC, % (95% CI)
     Converted from Class B or C hospital58 (50–65)
     Organized under Class B or C hospital13 (8–18)
     Organized under company, social group, or individuals (private enterprise)31 (23–38)
    • CHC = community health center; IQR = interquartile range.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    CHC Staff, Equipment, Facilities, Services, and Testing

    CharacteristicValue
    Staff, median No. (IQR)
     Full-time general practitioners8 (4–14)
     Part-time general practitioners0 (0–2)
     Dentists1 (0–2)
     Nurses13 (8–21)
     Managers/administrators2 (1–3)
     Front desk administrators/receptionists1 (0–1)
     Pharmacists2 (1–5)
     Physiotherapists1 (0–2)
     Psychologists0 (0–0)
     Social workers0 (0–1)
     Laboratory technicians2 (1–3)
     Radiographers1 (1–2)
    Equipment in consultation rooms, % (95% CI)
     Stethoscope98 (96–100)
     Sphygmomanometer97 (95–100)
     Thermometer96 (93–99)
     Computer for keeping medical records88 (83–93)
     Otoscope83 (73–93)
     Spotlight for gynecologic examination64 (56–71)
     Ophthalmoscope43 (35–52)
    Facilities available, % (95% CI)
     Observation/intravenous drug room100 (97–100)
     Treatment/wound dressing room93 (89–97)
     Inpatient beds87 (81–92)
     Drug dispensing84 (78–90)
     Internet access for staff81 (75–88)
     Designated parking facilities78 (72–85)
     Wheelchair access77 (70–84)
    Clinical services for various conditions, % (95% CI)
     Common ailments (cold, diarrhea)100 (97–100)
     Chronic disease management (hypertension, diabetes)99 (96–100)
     Traditional Chinese medicine96 (93–99)
     Maternity and infant health care93 (89–97)
     Vaccinations93 (89–97)
     Family planning/reproductive health79 (72–86)
     Dyslipidemia management62 (55–70)
     Sexually transmitted infection diagnosis and management34 (26–42)
     Mental health care34 (26–41)
     Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management30 (23–38)
    Testing available, % (95% CI)
     Blood tests (biochemistry, hematology)95 (91–98)
     Doppler/ultrasound91 (86–95)
     Rapid pregnancy test87 (81–92)
     Radiographs75 (68–82)
     Papanicolaou test53 (45–61)
     Microbiology38 (30–46)
    • CHC = community health center.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Characteristics of the CHCs’ Primary Care Practitioners and Continuing Education

    CharacteristicLead CliniciansPhysiciansNurses
    Sociodemographics
     Age, mean (SD), y–39.7 (10.6)33.1 (8.9)
     Male, % (95% CI)–39 (37–41)1 (0–2)
     Han Chinese, % (95% CI)–95 (94–96)95 (94–96)
    Highest qualification, % (95% CI)
     Less than associate degree–12 (10–13)21 (19–23)
     Associate degree–34 (31–36)50 (48–52)
     Graduate degree–49 (47–52)26 (24–28)
     Graduate degree with postgraduate qualifications–6 (5–7)3 (2–4)
    Primary specialty registration, % (95% CI)
     General practice–46 (44–48)5 (4–6)
     Integrative medicine–8 (7–10)0
     Other specialty–26 (24–28)1 (1–2)
    Years working, median (IQR)–14 (7–23)9 (4–18)
    Title, % (95% CI)
     Senior–10 (9–12)2 (2–3)
     Intermediate–41 (39–43)26 (24–28)
     Junior–40 (38–43)64 (61–66)
     None–9 (7–10)8 (7–9)
    Participation in continuing education, % (95% CI)–92 (91–93)89 (88–91)
    Frequency of CPD, % (95% CI)
     Yearly12 (7–17)––
     Quarterly18 (12–24)––
     Bimonthly10 (5–15)––
     Monthly52 (44–60)––
     Biweekly11 (6–16)––
     Weekly3 (0–5)––
    Professionals partaking in CPD, % (95% CI)
     Managers95 (92–99)––
     Physicians100 (97–100)––
     Nurses100 (97–100)––
     Other health care staff88 (82–93)––
     Receptionists61 (52–69)––
    Content of CPD, % (95% CI)
     Studies/discussion on diagnostic standards96 (93–99)86 (85–88)64 (62–67)
     Disease updates84 (78–90)80 (78–82)63 (60–65)
     Case discussions83 (77–89)78 (76–80)57 (55–60)
     Further medical education courses96 (93–99)92 (91–93)88 (86–89)
    Content of management meetings, % (95% CI)
     Organizing and managing services97 (94–100)––
     Conveying and implementing policies and documents100 (97–100)––
     Appraising department and team performance95 (91–98)––
    • CHC = community health center; CPD = continuous professional development; IQR = interquartile range.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Differences in CHC Characteristics According to Region

    CharacteristicEast (n = 56)West (n = 47)Central (n = 46)P Value
    Provision of care
     Population of catchment area, median (IQR)60,000 (37,000–100,000)60,500 (31,500–100,000)30,000 (21,000–72,000).03
     Annual person-time visits, median No. (IQR)125,000 (28,150–275,500)44,500 (17,300–111,000)11,250 (4,750–42,500)<.01
    Facilities, % (95% CI)
     Computers for keeping medical records81 (71–91)90 (82–98)86 (77–96).47
     Appointments can be made in advance61 (48–74)62 (49–76)61 (48–75).99
     Open 7 days a week77 (66–87)82 (72–93)64 (51–77).07
     Drug-dispensing facilities80 (69–90)82 (71–93)86 (77–96).59
     Treatment rooms90 (82–98)92 (85–100)92 (84–100).76
     Inpatient beds81 (71–91)92 (85–100)81 (70–92).12
     Designated parking81 (72–91)75 (63–87)74 (61–86).55
     Internet access for staff84 (75–94)80 (70–91)74 (62–86).38
    Staff composition, median (IQR)
     Age of staff, y55 (47–60)50 (42–54)49 (41–55).02
     Physicians registered as general practitioners, No.5 (2–12)2 (1–7)2 (1–3)<.01
     Administrators/managers, No.3 (1–5)2 (1–3)1 (1–2).01
     Receptionists, No.1 (0–1)1 (0–2)1 (0–1).70
     Pharmacists, No.5 (2–8)2 (1–4)2 (1–3)<.01
     Laboratory technicians, No.3 (2–4)2 (1–2)2 (1–2)<.01
    Services available, % (95% CI)
     Chronic disease management100 (93–100)100 (92–100)97 (87–100).26
     Family planning and reproductive services79 (68–90)76 (64–88)78 (66–89).92
     Maternity and infant health92 (85–99)92 (85–100)90 (82–98).90
     Vaccinations98 (90–100)90 (82–98)86 (76–96).16
     Mental health care39 (26–51)37 (23–50)27 (14–40).36
     On-site blood tests98 (90–100)92 (85–100)90 (82–98).49
     On-site radiographs72 (60–84)78 (67–90)70 (57–83).59
    • CHC = community health center; IQR = interquartile range.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    CHC Characteristics Associated With Number of Patients Each Physician Saw Per Day

    CharacteristicCoefficient (95% CI)P Value
    Structure of CHC
     Size of catchment area (per 10,000-person increment)−0.01 (−0.03 to 0.01).46
    Origin of CHC
     Converted from Class B/C hospital5.20 (−3.58 to 13.99).24
     Private enterprise11.05 (1.28 to 20.82).03a
    Number of days open per week−3.76 (−7.24 to −0.28).04a
    Daily staff composition (per 1–staff member increment)
     Pharmacists1.89 (0.72 to 3.06).002a
     Specialists−0.08 (−0.86 to 0.71).85
     Dentists0.52 (−2.23 to 3.26).70
     Nurses0.32 (0.12 to 0.52).002a
     Managers0.10 (−0.70 to 0.89).81
    Services available
     Number of servicesb−3.28 (−5.81 to −0.76).01a
    On-site testing available
     Radiography−1.03 (−8.22 to 6.16).78
     Blood testing4.18 (−13.57 to 21.92).64
     Ultrasound2.00 (−11.72 to 15.72).77
     Hepatitis B serology−5.16 (−14.36 to 4.04).27
     Rapid HIV test−5.21 (−11.84 to 1.42).12
     Rapid pregnancy test−2.30 (−12.22 to 7.63).65
     Rapid syphilis test4.42 (−1.64 to 10.48).15
    • CHC = community health center.

    • ↵a P <.05 by multivariate linear regression analysis.

    • ↵b Out of 7 possible services: traditional Chinese medicine, sexually transmitted infections diagnosis and management, drug dispensing, family planning/reproductive health, maternal and infant care services, vaccination services, and mental health care.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    CHC Characteristics Associated With Above-Median Employment of Physicians

    CharacteristicCoefficient (95% CI)P Value
    Structure of CHC
     Size of catchment area (per 10,000-person increment)0.00 (0.00 to 0.01).19
    Origin of CHC
     Private enterprise−1.84 (−3.60 to −0.08).04a
    Daily staff composition (per 1–staff member increment)
     Specialists0.51 (0.18 to 0.83).002a
     Nurses0.24 (0.11 to 0.37)<.001a
    Services available
     Number of servicesb1.04 (0.25 to 1.83).01a
    • CHC = community health center.

    • Note: The median number of physicians the CHCs employed was 7.

    • ↵a P <.05 by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

    • ↵b Out of 7 possible services: traditional Chinese medicine, sexually transmitted infection diagnosis and management, drug dispensing, family planning/reproductive health, maternal and infant care services, vaccination services, and mental health care.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Bridging the Gaps Between Patients and Primary Care in China: A Nationwide Representative Survey

    William C.W. Wong , and colleagues

    Background China's commitment to develop a strong primary care system through the establishment of community health centers has succeeded in creating more than 8,600 centers. However, there is a lack of trust in the newly-revamped system. This study examines the current quality of community health centers in China.

    What This Study Found China's community health centers are underused in part because of public mistrust of the physicians and because few centers are equipped to provide comprehensive primary care for a wide range of common physical and mental conditions. A survey of the structure and organization of the Chinese primary care system found less than one-half of physicians employed by CHCs were registered as primary care practitioners and few nurses had training specifically for primary care. Clinics were equipped with basic primary care equipment such as stethoscopes and sphygmomanometers, but only 43 percent had opthalmoscopes and 64 percent had facilities for gynecologic examination. Most CHCs had inpatient beds for their patients; however, only 38 percent had microbiology support and only 53 percent offered Pap screening. Clinical care was selectively skewed toward certain diseases. Virtually all CHCs provided management of common ailments, chronic diseases, hypertension, diabetes, traditional Chinese medicine, maternal and infant health care, and vaccinations, however large proportions did not provide management for other common conditions such as dyslipidemia, mental illness, sexually transmitted infections, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Use of services by patients was poor at each CHC: despite serving 50,000 people, the centers had an average of only 41,000 patient contacts a year, and each physician saw a median of only 12.5 patients per day.

    Implications

    • Based on these findings, the authors conclude that Chinese policy makers need to reconceptualize health care training and policy in order to alter the public perception of primary care in the country. There is a need, they write, to develop tools to evaluate primary care activities more clearly, integrate community-oriented thinking into primary care, and teach an integrated comprehensive approach (such as multidisciplinary teams), rather than selected care with a purely biomedical approach.
  • Supplemental Appendix

    Supplemental Appendix

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (3)
Vol. 15, Issue 3
May/June 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bridging the Gaps Between Patients and Primary Care in China: A Nationwide Representative Survey
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Bridging the Gaps Between Patients and Primary Care in China: A Nationwide Representative Survey
William C. W. Wong, Sunfang Jiang, Jason J. Ong, Minghui Peng, Eric Wan, Shanzhu Zhu, Cindy L. K. Lam, Michael R. Kidd, Martin Roland
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2017, 15 (3) 237-245; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2034

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Bridging the Gaps Between Patients and Primary Care in China: A Nationwide Representative Survey
William C. W. Wong, Sunfang Jiang, Jason J. Ong, Minghui Peng, Eric Wan, Shanzhu Zhu, Cindy L. K. Lam, Michael R. Kidd, Martin Roland
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2017, 15 (3) 237-245; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2034
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Assessing the quality of primary healthcare in seven Chinese provinces with unannounced standardised patients: protocol of a cross-sectional survey
  • Opportunities and barriers to STI testing in community health centres in China: a nationwide survey
  • Primary care workforce and continuous medical education in China: lessons to learn from a nationwide cross-sectional survey
  • In This Issue: Innovations in Primary Care and at the Annals
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Agile Implementation of a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Dementia in Primary Care
  • Authorship Inequity in Global Health Research Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Published in High-Income Country Family Medicine Journals
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Other topics:
    • Complementary / alternative medicine

Keywords

  • structure of care
  • delivery of care
  • quality of care
  • primary care
  • health personnel
  • patient acceptance of health care
  • China

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine