Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Recent Patterns in Shared Decision Making for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing in the United States

Stacey A. Fedewa, Ted Gansler, Robert Smith, Ann Goding Sauer, Richard Wender, Otis W. Brawley and Ahmedin Jemal
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2018, 16 (2) 139-144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2200
Stacey A. Fedewa
1Intramural Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georiga
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ted Gansler
1Intramural Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georiga
MD, MBA, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Smith
2Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann Goding Sauer
1Intramural Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georiga
MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Wender
2Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Otis W. Brawley
3Office of the Chief Medical Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ahmedin Jemal
1Intramural Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georiga
DVM, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figures 1a–d
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 1a–d
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 1a–d
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 1a–d
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 1a–d

    Receipt of shared decision making among men by PSA testing category, NHIS 2010 and 2015.

    NHIS = National Health Interview Survey; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.

    a Among men with PSA testing for routine reasons.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Receipt of Shared Decision Making Among Men by Testing History and Age, NHIS 2010 and 2015 (n = 9,598)

    Testing History and Age≥1 Element of SDMAdvantagesAdvantages and DisadvantagesFull
    20102015201020152010201520102015
    Among men with recent PSA testing (n = 3,079), %
    ≥50 y58.562.623.920.914.113.612.2a17.4a
     50–64 y58.363.423.721.314.615.011.6a17.3a
     65–74 y57.463.523.319.814.112.113.6a19.0a
     ≥75 y61.758.026.622.011.711.411.813.9
    Among men with nonrecent PSA testing (n = 2,104), %
    ≥50 y54.656.822.9a17.7a13.412.411.9a20.0a
     50–64 y56.555.123.2a15.7a13.312.214.319.7
     65–74 y48.9a59.4a20.921.314.813.37.0b19.8
     ≥75 y55.458.724.718.511.511.79.6a21.5a
    Among men with no PSA testing (n = 4,415), %
    ≥50 y10.410.33.93.72.11.82.82.6
     50–64 y10.410.04.03.51.82.42.63.1
     65–74 y10.69.84.8b5.31.5b1.5b3.0b1.6
     ≥75 y10.09.72.1b1.9b2.2b2.2b4.6b1.0b
    • NHIS = National Health Interview Survey, PSA = prostate-specific antigen, SDM = shared decision making.

    • ↵a Differences between 2010 and 2015 statistically significant at P <.05.

    • ↵b Estimates are unstable.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Adjusted Prevalence Ratios and 95% CI Predicting Shared Decision Making Among Men Who Received PSA Testing in the Past Year for Routine Reasons, NHIS 2010 and 2015

    Characteristic≥1 Element of SDM vs None aPR (95% CI)Advantages vs None aPR (95% CI)Advantages and Disadvantages vs None aPR (95% CI)Full vs None aPR (95% CI)
    Among men with recent PSA testinga
    Year
     20101.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
     20151.04 (0.98–1.11)0.82 (0.71–0.96)b0.94 (0.79–1.12)1.51 (1.28–1.79)b
    Age
     50–64 y1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
     65–74 y1.24 (0.88–1.76)0.90 (0.69–1.18)0.89 (0.61–1.30)1.02 (0.77–1.35)
     ≥75 y0.99 (0.63–1.54)0.96 (0.07–1.32)0.78 (0.52–1.18)0.95 (0.69–1.30)
    Among men with nonrecent PSA testingc
    Year
     20101.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
     20151.04 (0.93–1.15)0.78 (0.61–0.98)b0.90 (0.69–1.18)1.69 (1.29–2.20)b
    Age
     50–64 y1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
     65–74 y1.08 (0.90–1.30)1.41 (0.91–2.20)0.95 (0.54–1.65)0.75 (0.49–1.16)
     ≥75 y1.13 (0.93–1.37)1.39 (0.83–2.31)0.80 (0.42–1.54)0.85 (0.54–1.33)
    Among men with no PSA testingd
    Year
     20101.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
     20150.97 (0.76–1.24)0.91 (0.60–1.37)1.27 (0.74–2.18)0.90 (0.56–1.43)
    Age
     50–64 y1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
     65–74 y0.99 (0.60–1.62)1.07 (0.40–2.86)0.62 (0.24–1.55)1.04 (0.53–2.01)
     ≥75 y0.85 (0.45–1.58)0.45 (0.13–1.60)1.05 (0.37–2.93)1.47 (0.70–3.10)
    • aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio; NHIS = National Health Interview Survey; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; SDM = shared decision making.

    • Note: Each model is adjusted for: age, survey year, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, insurance type, immigration status, and geographic region.

    • ↵a Model includes 2,592 men; 487 men excluded from each model based on missing educational attainment and immigration data.

    • ↵b Statistically significant at P <.05.

    • ↵c Model includes 1,752 men; 352 men excluded from each model based on missing educational attainment and immigration data.

    • ↵d Model includes 4,246; 169 men excluded from each model based on missing educational attainment and immigration data.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Recent Patterns in Shared Decision Making for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing in the United States

    Stacey A. Fedewa , and colleagues

    Background There is consensus that the decision to undergo prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening should be shared by patients and clinicians, but rates of shared decision making are low. This study examines whether there have been recent changes in shared decision-making for PSA testing.

    What This Study Found Although there has been no increase in shared decision making for PSA testing, the content of discussions has become more comprehensive. The study compared responses to the National Health Interview Survey in 2010 and 2015 among men age 50 and older (n=9598). In this nationally representative sample, a similar proportion (approximately 60 percent) of men with recent PSA testing reported one or more elements of shared decision-making in both 2010 and 2015. They also reported a modest shift away from discussions limited to the advantages of PSA testing toward full shared decision-making in which advantages, disadvantages, and uncertainties were discussed (12 percent of recently-tested men in 2010 compared to 17 percent in 2015). One in 10 men who did not receive PSA testing reported receiving one or more elements of shared decision making, a number which did not change during the study period.

    Implications

    • The results suggest that, contrary to guideline recommendations, many men receiving PSA testing still do not receive shared decision making and a limited number of men without PSA testing receive one or more shared decision-making elements.
    • The authors call for new and innovative strategies to achieve more widespread application of shared decision-making for men considering PSA testing.
  • Supplemental Figure and Tables

    Supplemental Figure and Tables

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Figure and Tables - PDF file
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 16 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 16 (2)
Vol. 16, Issue 2
March/April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recent Patterns in Shared Decision Making for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing in the United States
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Recent Patterns in Shared Decision Making for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing in the United States
Stacey A. Fedewa, Ted Gansler, Robert Smith, Ann Goding Sauer, Richard Wender, Otis W. Brawley, Ahmedin Jemal
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2018, 16 (2) 139-144; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2200

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Recent Patterns in Shared Decision Making for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing in the United States
Stacey A. Fedewa, Ted Gansler, Robert Smith, Ann Goding Sauer, Richard Wender, Otis W. Brawley, Ahmedin Jemal
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2018, 16 (2) 139-144; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2200
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effect of a Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Aid for African-American Men in Primary Care Settings
  • Current Prevalence of Major Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Test Use in the United States: Disparities by Education and Race/Ethnicity
  • In This Issue: Refining Care and its Frameworks
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
  • Adverse Outcomes Associated With Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Personalized care
  • Other topics:
    • Communication / decision making

Keywords

  • decision making
  • early detection of cancer
  • prostate-specific antigen

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine