Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Brief ReportResearch Brief

Geographic Characteristics of Loneliness in Primary Care

Sebastian Tong, Rebecca A. Mullen, Camille J. Hochheimer, Roy T. Sabo, Winston R. Liaw, Donald E. Nease, Alex H. Krist and John J. Frey
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2019, 17 (2) 158-160; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2364
Sebastian Tong
1Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sebastian.tc.tong@gmail.com
Rebecca A. Mullen
2Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Camille J. Hochheimer
3Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roy T. Sabo
3Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Winston R. Liaw
4Department of Health Systems and Population Health Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
5Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald E. Nease Jr
2Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex H. Krist
1Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John J. Frey III
6Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Loneliness is associated with poor health outcomes, and there is growing attention on loneliness as a social determinant of health. Our study sought to determine the associations between community factors and loneliness. The Three-Item Loneliness Scale and zip codes of residence were collected in primary care practices in Colorado and Virginia. Living in zip codes with higher unemployment, poor access to health care, lower income, higher proportions of blacks, and poor transportation was associated with higher mean loneliness scores. Future studies that examine interventions addressing loneliness may be more effective if they consider social context and community characteristics.

Key words
  • loneliness
  • social determinants of health
  • social isolation

INTRODUCTION

The communities where patients live and work have an important role in health outcomes and perceived health.1 Recognizing the importance of social determinants of health, the National Academy of Medicine recommended that primary care clinicians routinely collect information on 12 social and behavioral domains.2 Social connections and social isolation were included as 1 of the domains, but loneliness, which is the subjective perception of the inadequacy of one’s social connections, was not.3 Although loneliness was initially emphasized in geriatric populations, there is growing recognition of its high prevalence in primary care settings, with an estimated prevalence of 20%.4 Furthermore, loneliness is associated with higher risk of premature death, dementia, high blood pressure, and depression as well as increased utilization of health services.3,5

Although these individual health associations with loneliness are well established, associations with community characteristics of place of residence are unknown. The National Academy of Medicine recommends including community characteristics in routine primary care,6 but it remains unclear whether doing so is of value compared with merely collecting patient information and unclear how clinicians could use this place-based information.7 Our study aimed to describe the associations between socioeconomic factors in communities and loneliness.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional study design, we collected survey data from patients in 16 practices across 2 practice-based research networks: the Virginia Ambulatory Outcomes Research Network (ACORN) and the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices (SNOCAP). The survey used the Three-Item Loneliness Scale screening tool8 and also asked respondents for their zip code of residence, which we matched to Zip Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs.) The survey was collected on paper between April 2017 and January 2018 from patients aged 18 years and older while they were in the primary care waiting room before their appointment. Patients who could not read English were excluded. Patients were approached until 100 responses per practice were obtained or the end of a consecutive 7-day collection period, whichever occurred first. ZCTA-level community variables were obtained from American FactFinder9 and HealthLandscape.10 We included economic, demographic, transportation, and health care access variables. ZCTAs with <5 respondents were excluded.

Associations between ZCTA-level community variables and patient-level loneliness scores were estimated with a linear mixed model to account for clustering of patients within ZCTAs. Correlation coefficients were taken as the square root of the coefficient of determination, calculated via simple algebra from the resulting type III F-test statistic and numerator and denominator degrees of freedom (F = [R2/1 – R2] × [ndf/ddf]). The SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc) was used to perform analyses, and the R statistical software version 3.5.0 (the R Foundation) with the sp, rgdal, and classInt packages was used for mapping.

The study was approved by the Virginia Commonwealth University Institutional Review Board and the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

Of the 1,235 survey respondents (528 from SNOCAP and 707 from ACORN), 20% were identified as lonely (based on a score of 6 or higher on a scale of 1 to 9 on the Three-Item Loneliness Scale). A total of 44 ZCTAs from Virginia and 32 ZCTAs from Colorado were included in our analysis. A map showing the geographic distribution of loneliness is shown in Figure 1. In Richmond, Virginia, high loneliness score ZCTAs are adjacent. Scores in Denver, Colorado are lower overall.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Mean loneliness score by zip code of residence in (A) Northern Virginia, (B) Metro Richmond, Virginia, and (C) Metro Denver, Colorado.

Patients living in ZCTAs with higher poverty, higher Social Deprivation Index scores, higher proportions of unemployment and of individuals with less than a high school education, and lower median household income were associated with higher mean loneliness scores. Those in ZCTAs with proportionally more 1-person households, females, and blacks had higher mean loneliness scores. Patients in ZCTAs with a higher mean travel time and with higher percentages of households with no vehicle had higher levels of loneliness. Patients in ZCTAs with higher percentages of residents without health insurance and without a usual source of care had higher loneliness scores. Associations are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Associations Between Loneliness and Geospatial Variables, by Zip Code Tabulation Area of Residence

DISCUSSION

Living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged community is associated with higher mean loneliness scores. As others have shown, neighborhoods affect social relationships and interactions.1,2 These findings reinforce current calls by the National Academy of Medicine and other national leaders to routinely collect place of residence because of its influence on individual health and the need for interventions that address not only individual but also community-level factors that contribute to health and well-being.2 However, current screening tools are lengthy and may be difficult to routinely administer in primary care settings. Given the associations between loneliness and other community-level factors, screening for loneliness may be a proxy for other social needs. Primary care practices could play a leading role in developing and testing these interventions for loneliness, and loneliness could be an important first social need to address.

There are several limitations with our study. First, although we had 1,235 survey respondents across Virginia and Colorado, we were able to include only a minority of ZCTAs from each state (Virginia, 44/896; Colorado, 32/536). Second, because of the dispersion of the ZCTAs included, we were unable to perform more in-depth geospatial analyses. Even with this sample, however, we still found many significant associations.

This study reports the many associations between community-level variables and loneliness. Studies to replicate these findings with a more contiguous sample may help develop collaborative community–primary care interventions to address social determinants and loneliness, ultimately improving health outcomes for those with loneliness.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • Received for publication August 15, 2018.
  • Revision received November 22, 2018.
  • Accepted for publication January 16, 2019.
  • © 2019 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Artiga S,
    2. Hinton E
    . Beyond health care: the role of social determinants in promoting health and health equity. https://www.kff.org/disparities-policy/issue-brief/beyond-health-care-the-role-of-social-determinants-in-promoting-health-and-health-equity/. Published May 10, 2018. Accessed Jul 30, 2018.
  2. ↵
    Institute of Medicine. Capturing Social and Behavioral Domains and Measures in Electronic Health Records: Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
  3. ↵
    1. Daaleman TP
    . The long loneliness of primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(5):388–389.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Mullen R,
    2. Tong S,
    3. Sabo R,
    4. et al
    . Loneliness in primary care patients: a prevalence study. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(2):108–115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Holt-Lunstad J
    . The potential public health relevance of social isolation and loneliness: prevalence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Public Policy Aging Rep. 2017; 27(4): 127–130.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Blumenthal D,
    2. McGinnis JM
    . Measuring vital signs: an IOM report on core metrics for health and health care progress. JAMA. 2015; 313(19): 1901–1902.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Tong ST,
    2. Liaw WR,
    3. Kashiri PL,
    4. et al
    . Clinician experiences with screening for social needs in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018; 31(3): 351–363.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Hughes ME,
    2. Waite LJ,
    3. Hawkley LC,
    4. Cacioppo JT
    . A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res Aging. 2004; 26(6): 655–672.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    United States Census Bureau. American fact finder. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Accessed Jul 9, 2018.
  10. ↵
    Robert Graham Center. HealthLandscape. http://www.healthlandscape.org. Accessed Jul 9, 2018.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 17 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 17 (2)
Vol. 17, Issue 2
March/April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Geographic Characteristics of Loneliness in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Geographic Characteristics of Loneliness in Primary Care
Sebastian Tong, Rebecca A. Mullen, Camille J. Hochheimer, Roy T. Sabo, Winston R. Liaw, Donald E. Nease, Alex H. Krist, John J. Frey
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2019, 17 (2) 158-160; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2364

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Geographic Characteristics of Loneliness in Primary Care
Sebastian Tong, Rebecca A. Mullen, Camille J. Hochheimer, Roy T. Sabo, Winston R. Liaw, Donald E. Nease, Alex H. Krist, John J. Frey
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2019, 17 (2) 158-160; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2364
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Loneliness: an incommunicable disease?
  • In This Issue: Minding the Gaps
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family Physicians Stopping Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada
  • Communication Gaps Persist Between Primary Care and Specialist Physicians
  • The Provincial Spread and Scale of the Ontario eConsult Service: Evaluation of the First 2 Years
Show more Research Brief

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Social / cultural context

Keywords

  • loneliness
  • social determinants of health
  • social isolation

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine