Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Review ArticleSystematic Review

Blue-Light Therapy for Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anna Mae Scott, Paulina Stehlik, Justin Clark, Dexing Zhang, Zuyao Yang, Tammy Hoffmann, Chris Del Mar and Paul Glasziou
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2019, 17 (6) 545-553; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2445
Anna Mae Scott
1Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ascott@bond.edu.au
Paulina Stehlik
1Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin Clark
1Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dexing Zhang
2Division of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zuyao Yang
3Division of Epidemiology, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tammy Hoffmann
1Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Del Mar
1Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Glasziou
1Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    PRISMA chart.

    aSee Supplemental Appendix at http://www.annfammed.org/content/17/6/545/suppl/DC1.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Risk of bias.

    The risk of bias for all 14 trials was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias tool.13

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Mean difference between groups in the mean number of noninflammatory lesions.

    BRA = Brazil; USA = United States of America.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Mean difference between groups in the mean number of inflammatory lesions.

    BRA = Brazil; USA = United States of America.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Characteristics of Included Studies

    StudyParticipantsInterventionComparatorPrimary Outcome Investigator Assessment
    Author, Year, LocationUnit of RandomizationFollow-Upa (Weeks)Mean Age in Years (Range)Acne Severity Mild Moderate SevereN TotalLight Wavelength: Blue = 4-500 nm Red = ≥600 nmTotal No. of SessionsDuration of Exposure (Weeks)TypeTotal No. of SessionsDuration of Exposure (Weeks)
    Gold et al,20 2011 (USA)Lesion≤1.530 (NR)Mild, moderate30Blue40.3Sham device40.3NR
    Antoniou et al,16 2016 (GRC)Half-face1221 (16-30)Moderate, severe98Blue126No treatmentn/an/aIn blue light group, 34% more patients experienced ≥2 IGA grade reductions (P <.0001)
    Tzung et al,23 2004 (TWN)Half-face821 (15-32)Mild, moderate31Blue84No treatmentn/an/aPatients treated with blue light had greater mean % improvement of overall acne severity (45% vs 12%), P <.05
    Elman et al,18 2003, (ISR)Half-face1219 (NR)NR23Blue84No treatmentn/an/aNR
    Gold et al,19 2005 (USA)Individual431 (13-55)mild, moderate25Blue84Topical 1% clindamycin564Narrative only
    de Arruda et al,17 2009 (BRA)Individual617 (NR)Moderate, severeb60Blue84Topical BPO 5%564NR
    Papageorgiou et al,8 2000c (UK)Individual1223, 25, 27d (NR)Mild, moderate82a. Blue b. Blue/red8412Topical BPO 5%NRNRClear or marked improvemente: blue/red: 63% of patients, blue 40%, benzoyl: 35%. P value NR.
    Kwon et al,3 2013 (KOR)Individual1223, 24f (NR)Mild, moderate35Blue/red564Sham device564Blue/red: 66% more patients rated clear (IGA = 0) or almost clear (IGA = 1), P <.01
    Alba et al,15 2017 (BRA)Individual1016 (NR)Mild, moderateg22Blue/red1010Topical SA peel 10%1010NR
    Nestor, et al,21 2016 (USA)Individual12NR (12-18)Mild, moderate105a. Blue/red + cleanser b. Blue/red + cleanser + 1% SA + retinol8412Topical BPO 2.5% + cleanser16812Blue/red + cleanser: 19% improve- ment in IGA scale (P <.001); Blue/red + cleanser + SA + retinol 14%; BPO 5% improvement
    Ash et al,24 2015 (UK)Individual12NR (16-45)Mild, moderate41Blue + topical (SA + glycolic and lactic acids) + moisturizer288“Control” (details NR)NRNRNR
    Chu,26 1999, NRIndividual12NR (NR)Mild, moderate107ha. Blue b. Blue/red8412Topical BPO 5%16812Narrative only
    Miller et al,27 2017, NRIndividual12NR (12-40)Mild, moderateNRBlue/red1iNRTopical BPO 2.5%2jNRNR
    Ash et al,25 2013 (UK)IndividualNRNR (NR)Mild, moderate39Blue + topical creamsNRNR“Control” (details NR)NRNRNR
    • BPO = benzoyl peroxide; BRA = Brazil; GRC = Greece; IGA = Investigators’ Global Assessment scale for acne; ISR = Israel; KOR = Korea; n/a = not applicable; NR = not reported; SA = salicylic acid; TWN = Taiwan; UK = United Kingdom; USA = United States of America.

    • ↵a This includes the treatment period.

    • ↵b Acne grade II and III on the Brazilian classification scale. Grade II presents comedones and more inflammatory papules; grade III presents pustules in addition to any of grade II.

    • ↵c Reported here are the blue-light, blue/red-light, and benzoyl peroxide groups, not the cool white group.

    • ↵d In blue-light, blue/red-light, and benzoyl peroxide groups respectively.

    • ↵e Marked improvement defined as overall treatment response of 60% to 89%; clearance defined as 390%.

    • ↵f In blue-light and sham groups, respectively.

    • ↵g Acne grade I and II on the Brazilian classification scale. Grade I represents comedones only; grade II represents comedones and more inflammatory papules.

    • ↵h Total for all 4 groups (blue light, blue/red light, benzoyl peroxide, white light); N for individual groups not reported.

    • ↵i Reported as “1 session per day,” duration NR.

    • ↵j Reported as “2 sessions per day,” duration NR.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendixes

    Supplemental Appendixes

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendixes - PDF file
  • The Article in Brief

    Blue-Light Therapy for Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Anna Mae Scott , and colleagues

    Background Acne is one of the most common reasons for clinical consultations. Market and patient demand is high for light therapy as an alternative to antibiotic approaches to acne treatment. However, conclusions about the effectiveness of blue light therapy for acne are limited.

    What This Study Found A new systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials of blue-light therapy for acne shows methodological and reporting limitations--including small sample sizes, short intervention periods, and variation in reporting quality for acne outcomes. Only three of the trials reported significant improvements in expert-assessed acne severity with blue-light therapy over a control group. The majority of trials do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude effectiveness.

    Implications

    • Because evidence for blue-light therapy is not conclusive, patients should discuss with their clinicians the possible benefits, costs, and alternatives for acne treatment. Blue light therapy may be beneficial for some patients, but more research is needed.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 17 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine
Vol. 17, Issue 6
November/December 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Blue-Light Therapy for Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Blue-Light Therapy for Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Anna Mae Scott, Paulina Stehlik, Justin Clark, Dexing Zhang, Zuyao Yang, Tammy Hoffmann, Chris Del Mar, Paul Glasziou
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2019, 17 (6) 545-553; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2445

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Blue-Light Therapy for Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Anna Mae Scott, Paulina Stehlik, Justin Clark, Dexing Zhang, Zuyao Yang, Tammy Hoffmann, Chris Del Mar, Paul Glasziou
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2019, 17 (6) 545-553; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2445
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
  • Rural Patient Experiences of Accessing Care for Chronic Conditions: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies
  • Implementation and Effectiveness of Integrating Palliative Care Into Ambulatory Care of Noncancer Serious Chronic Illness: Mixed Methods Review and Meta-Analysis
Show more Systematic Review

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Children's health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Keywords

  • acne vulgaris
  • humans
  • light
  • phototherapy

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine