Article Figures & Data
Tables
Characteristic Small and Medium-Sized Hospitals Community-Based Offices Beds Yes No Services provided Outpatient care, home care, inpatient care Outpatient care, home care Ownership Mostly private Mostly private Number of primary care physicians 2 or more Usually 1 Staff Physicians, nurses, medical assistants, pharmacists, therapists, technologists, etc Physicians, nurses, medical assistants, etc Characteristica Total (N = 1,725) Primary Care Practice Location Hospital (n = 617) Community-Based Office (n = 1,108) P Valueb Sex, No. (%) .41 Male 663 (38.4) 227 (36.8) 436 (39.4) Female 765 (44.3) 278 (45.1) 487 (44.0) Age-group, No. (%) .30 20-29 y 20 (1.2) 10 (1.6) 10 (0.9) 30-39 y 47 (2.7) 10 (1.6) 37 (3.3) 40-49 y 87 (5.0) 35 (5.7) 52 (4.7) 50-59 y 162 (9.4) 60 (9.7) 102 (9.2) 60-69 y 399 (23.1) 133 (21.6) 266 (24.0) 70-79 y 510 (29.6) 159 (25.8) 351 (31.7) ≥80 y 236 (13.7) 113 (18.3) 123 (11.1) Education, No. (%) .44 <High school 324 (18.8) 115 (18.6) 209 (18.9) High school 610 (35.4) 213 (34.5) 397 (35.8) Junior college 213 (12.3) 77 (12.5) 136 (12.3) ≥College 281 (16.3) 107 (17.3) 174 (15.7) Annual household income, in million JPY, No. (%) .79 <3.00 (≈US$27,000) 676 (39.2) 258 (41.8) 418 (37.7) 3.00-4.99 388 (22.5) 120 (19.4) 268 (24.2) 5.00-6.99 152 (8.8) 52 (8.4) 100 (9.0) 7.00-9.99 82 (4.8) 33 (5.3) 49 (4.4) ≥10.00 39 (2.3) 16 (2.6) 23 (2.1) Self-rated health status, No. (%) <.001 Excellent 26 (1.5) 11 (1.8) 15 (1.4) Very good 223 (12.9) 70 (11.3) 153 (13.8) Good 832 (48.2) 271 (43.9) 561 (50.6) Poor 333 (19.3) 144 (23.3) 189 (17.1) Very poor 35 (2.0) 22 (3.6) 13 (1.2) Number of chronic health conditions, No. (%)c .81 0 423 (24.5) 152 (24.6) 271 (24.5) 1 439 (25.4) 160 (25.9) 279 (25.2) 2 376 (21.8) 132 (21.4) 244 (22.0) ≥3 487 (28.2) 173 (28.0) 314 (28.3) ↵a Data were missing for 297 patients for sex; 264 for age-group; 297 for education; 388 for annual household income; 276 for self-rated health status; and none for number of chronic conditions.
↵b By χ2 test for trend.
↵c Simple counts of the following chronic conditions: hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, malignancy, stroke, cardiac diseases, dementia, neurologic diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, digestive diseases, hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases, kidney diseases, urologic diseases, endocrine diseases, arthritis, rheumatism, lumbar diseases, osteoporosis, mental disorders, and skin diseases.
JPACT Domaina Total (N = 1,725) Primary Care Practice Location Hospitals (n = 617) Community-Based Offices (n = 1,108) P Valueb First contact, mean (SD) score 60.8 (23.9) 69.3 (18.7) 56.1 (25.2) <.001 Longitudinality, mean (SD) score 79.8 (16.0) 79.2 (17.3) 80.2 (15.3) .23 Coordination, mean (SD) score 67.4 (23.1) 64.7 (23.4) 67.9 (24.2) .01 Comprehensiveness: services available, mean (SD) score 67.4 (23.1) 66.1 (25.1) 68.0 (22.0) .18 Comprehensiveness: services provided, mean (SD) score 42.5 (27.7) 40.9 (28.4) 43.3 (27.3) .15 Community orientation, mean (SD) score 71.3 (18.3) 66.2 (19.1) 74.1 (17.2) <.001 - Table 4
Differences in JPCAT Scores Between Hospital-Based Practices and Community-Based Office Practices (N = 1,725 Patients)
JPACT Domaina Unadjusted Mean Difference (95% CI) in Score P Value Adjustedb Mean Difference (95% CI) in Score P Value First contact 15.89 (4.80 to 26.99) .005 15.43 (5.13 to 25.72) .003 Longitudinality 0.24 (–2.82 to 3.30) .88 –0.26 (–3.00 to 2.48) .85 Coordination –2.08 (–6.17 to 2.00) .32 –2.72 (–6.18 to 0.73) .12 Comprehensiveness: services available –0.92 (–5.44 to 3.61) .69 –1.49 (–5.54 to 2.56) .47 Comprehensiveness: services provided –1.39 (–5.24 to 2.46) .48 –1.60 (–5.23 to 2.03) .39 Community orientation –5.52 (–10.31 to –0.74) .02 –5.76 (–10.35 to –1.17) .01 JPCAT = Japanese version of Primary Care Assessment Tool.
Note: Differences computed with a linear mixed effects model, a random effect on facility, and community-based offices as the reference group.
↵a All domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better patient experience.
↵b Adjusted for age, sex, years of education, annual household income, and self-rated health status.
Additional Files
Supplemental Tables 1-2
Supplemental Tables 1-2
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Supplemental data: Tables 1-2 - PDF file
The Article in Brief
Comparison of Primary Care Experience in Hospital-Based Practices and Community-Based Office Practices in Japan
Takuya Aoki , and colleagues
Background In Japan, primary care services are generally delivered in both outpatient departments within hospitals and in community-based offices, that are often privately-owned and operate independently of hospitals. Little is known on the differences in patient experience between hospital-based and community-based office primary care practices in Japan.
What This Study Found A comparison of the strengths and challenges of primary care between hospital-based practices and community-based office practices was observed in a cross-sectional study in Japan. Six small and medium-sized hospitals and 19 community-based office practices participated in the study of 1,725 patients. Patient experience was measured using a Japanese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool, which was comprised of first contact, longitudinality, coordination, comprehensiveness (services provided), and community orientation.
Implications
- Understanding the strengths of each practice type with respect to patient experience may inform future efforts to improve the patient experience overall.