Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Article CommentaryDepartmentsA

Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians’ Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature

Verneda S. Troyer and Jennifer M. Ledonne
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2020, 18 (2) iii; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2505
Verneda S. Troyer
Grant Family Medicine
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer M. Ledonne
Grant Family Medicine
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Commentary on "Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care physicians’ work: A Critical Interpretative Synthesis of Literature"
    Aisha Bhatti, Beauchamp Liana, Cesar Ramirez, Gerardo Rubio, Phil Scheibel, Shannon Thoele and Angelica Ukaigwe
    Published on: 02 June 2020
  • Published on: (2 June 2020)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Commentary on "Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care physicians’ work: A Critical Interpretative Synthesis of Literature"
    RE: Commentary on "Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care physicians’ work: A Critical Interpretative Synthesis of Literature"
    • Aisha Bhatti, Medical Student, University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford
    • Other Contributors:
      • Beauchamp Liana, Medical Student
      • Cesar Ramirez, Medical Student
      • Gerardo Rubio, Medical Student
      • Phil Scheibel, Medical Student
      • Shannon Thoele, Medical Student
      • Angelica Ukaigwe, Medical Student

    The purpose of this study was to define what an operational failure is and determine how prevalent it is in a primary care setting. The authors had to define these operational failures in order to create criteria to use to evaluate the research papers. Operational failures were defined as system level errors involving the supply of necessary materials, equipment, or information to employees. These errors can interfere with healthcare workers' job performance and therefore complicate the delivery of high-quality healthcare. Operational failures can make or break a primary care center due to the time spent making corrections to the failures, such as equipment issues, scheduling, and other mundane activities. Potential complications include a reduction in patient safety, job efficiency, and healthcare worker satisfaction. Many studies have focused on cataloging the shortcomings of primary care. The authors of this study aim to characterize how physicians are affected by operational failures.

    Previous literature related to operational failures is primarily focused on hospital settings. There is little information about operational failures and how they impact healthcare providers in primary care settings in the current published literature and this study addresses the gap. The authors also define some moments in crisis when there is a breakdown in system processes because of operational failures. The study used a critical interpretive synthesis technique, which i...

    Show More

    The purpose of this study was to define what an operational failure is and determine how prevalent it is in a primary care setting. The authors had to define these operational failures in order to create criteria to use to evaluate the research papers. Operational failures were defined as system level errors involving the supply of necessary materials, equipment, or information to employees. These errors can interfere with healthcare workers' job performance and therefore complicate the delivery of high-quality healthcare. Operational failures can make or break a primary care center due to the time spent making corrections to the failures, such as equipment issues, scheduling, and other mundane activities. Potential complications include a reduction in patient safety, job efficiency, and healthcare worker satisfaction. Many studies have focused on cataloging the shortcomings of primary care. The authors of this study aim to characterize how physicians are affected by operational failures.

    Previous literature related to operational failures is primarily focused on hospital settings. There is little information about operational failures and how they impact healthcare providers in primary care settings in the current published literature and this study addresses the gap. The authors also define some moments in crisis when there is a breakdown in system processes because of operational failures. The study used a critical interpretive synthesis technique, which includes a review of literature. When analyzing articles to include in the study, the researchers posed a broad question, which formed the context for their inclusion and exclusion criteria. Next, they reviewed literature with their guided questions and created qualitative findings. Some inclusion and exclusion criteria included whether aims and objectives were clearly stated, research design was specified, and clear accounts of the process was provided by researchers, as well as qualitative data analysis and if it was done appropriately – only 95 studies satisfied this criterion. The researchers formulated their question by mainly focusing on primary care settings and excluded tertiary care or hospital settings. They also focused on what the primary care physicians thought they had to do versus what they actually needed to do – which contributed to emotional and physical tolls that physicians endure leading to poor outcomes and physician burn out. In order to search literature, one reviewer looked into seven databases and looked for citations that fit with the definition of operational failure. After this initial review, two reviewers looked at 30% of the cases that the first reviewer was not sure on. The reviewers reviewed the abstracts for all of the citations retrieved. The second two authors read the 372 full text articles to assess for eligibility. They reviewed articles further for outlying information to only 95 studies included out of 10,962 studies from the initial review. Qualitative and numeric values were obtained regarding the operational failures. After analysis and review, the 95 remaining studies were put into the matrix. Envivo 11, a common qualitative analysis software, was used to look for themes and create conceptual themes.

    The key findings are classified within categories of operational failures in hospital nursing, including medication, supply items, medical orders, equipment, insufficient staffing, and more. The measurement of the impact of these failures included interruptions, directly and indirectly consumed time, additional tasks, risks, and wasted materials. Issues identified by the physicians include compensatory labor (additional work to accomplish patient care that was not originally planned or intended) and how that became an essential part of primary care duties and often involved mundane tasks (information chasing, resolving technology issues, etc.). Also, poorly designed technologies- slow running speed, time consuming searches, duplicate data entry, information discontinuity which hindered ability for physicians to make clinical decisions due to missing steps, information overload, and information scatter. The most frequently reported operational failures related to information technology include electronic health records, computer decision support systems, e-prescribing, and e-referral systems. Failures in practice included inefficient information channeling through the practice or inefficient supplies and materials. Impacts of the operational failures include time consumption, disruption of task completion, delayed clinical decisions, and the interference of the doctor-patient relationship. All of these issues affected physician duties and lead to fragmented care.

    The concept of work as ‘imagined work’ versus ‘work as done’ or ‘work as configured’ goes into the concept of expectations in physicians’ lines of work that go beyond the job description. We discussed the concept of primary care providers wanting to focus on patient care, but having their time taken up by phone calls, paperwork, and working with other departments to find patient information. We also investigated the possibility of operational failures in medical school and opportunities for burn out, such as rotation miscommunication between the school and provider, and tasks that are not included in the job description varying greatly in each setting. We concluded that learning to compensate for operational failures early in a career might be a good thing as students, so we can be equipped to handle these issues with our own teams in the future. PCPs are seen as a bridge, bringing together all aspects of patient care including letters, ambiguous discharge instructions, and information overload. A possible solution would be to construct a universal way to access information quickly, so information isn’t buried in the EMR. Operational failures have the potential to increase the workload of primary care physicians to ensure patient care. Additional research can be done to analyze the most impactful operational failure. Systems can also review their operational failures and scrutinize the effects these failures have on primary care physicians' work and patient outcomes.

    We need to limit operational failures - primary care physicians are being affected now more than ever. A possible answer could be a universal healthcare system. Although this is not a perfect system, but it is a one-stop shop for understanding information about one patient. Also, there is a structural perspective of having the multidisciplinary team-based care approach to help primary care, which can help solve some of these knowledge gaps while limiting the burden of undefined tasks from being unrecognized work in a physician’s productivity. We discussed that adding more physicians in a broken system will not solve the crisis. The answer may be to focus on getting the system to run smoothly in the primary care work environment and focusing on improving primary care. We can also conduct detailed research to find specific operational failures with the greatest impact and need for restructuring. Since this study is a UK study, their system runs differently due to the NHS healthcare system. The US has more specialist physicians, hospitalists, and primary care physicians that all operate very differently and separately, which contributes to fragmented care. The best way to start is to focus on the operational failures within your system and try to combat the ones of highest priority. Currently, as the healthcare system is strained with the COVID-19 outbreak, it is crucial to recognize systems that are flawed for our healthcare providers, and ultimately for patient care. Now, especially, it is apparent that when the current system is tested these erroneous systems can lead to fatal consequences.

    References

    Carol Sinnott, MB, BAO, BCb, MMedSci, PHD, MICGP, MRCPI, Alexandros Georgiadis MSc, PgDip, PhD, John Park, MB, CbB, & Mary Dixon-Woods, DPhil (2020). Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physician’s Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature. Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 2.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 18 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 18 (2)
Vol. 18, Issue 2
March/April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians’ Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians’ Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature
Verneda S. Troyer, Jennifer M. Ledonne
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 18 (2) iii; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2505

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians’ Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature
Verneda S. Troyer, Jennifer M. Ledonne
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 18 (2) iii; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2505
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • HOW IT WORKS
    • CURRENT SELECTION
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • STFM Announces New Point of Care Ultrasound Task Force and Initiative on POCUS Family Medicine Education
  • Addressing Research Pathway Gaps: Insights from a Needs Assessment at the AAFP Future Conference
  • Support for the WHO Resolution on Social Participation
Show more Departments

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine