Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsDepartmentsF

IDENTIFYING TRENDS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT USING REPORTS FROM THE NATIONAL GRADUATE SURVEY FOR FAMILY MEDICINE

Wendy Barr and Jessie M. Pettit
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2020, 18 (5) 473-475; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2597
Wendy Barr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessie M. Pettit
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The National Graduate Survey (NGS) for family medicine is administered annually by the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) in partnership with the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors to facilitate improvements in residency education by providing programs with access to nationally standardized data about their programs.1 All ABFM-certified graduates receive the survey 3 years after they finish residency and have from January to December to complete the survey. The first survey in 2016 queried residency graduates from 2013; 4 surveys have been completed with the most recent 2019 survey of graduates from 2016. Residency programs receive a report with their graduates’ responses as well as the national data. If fewer than 3 graduates of a residency program respond, these responses are held and later combined with the subsequent year’s data.

Residency programs have used these reports to identify trends and areas for improvement. As our specialty looks towards the future, including a major revision to ACGME RC requirements, we can reflect on these 4 years of data.

With 4 years of survey data, 8,980 family medicine graduates have completed the graduate survey with an overall 69% response rate. The survey captures the scope of graduate practice and graduates’ self-reported training in residency. It also captures where and what types of practices graduates are practicing in and their self-reported burnout and feelings about their training, specialty, and medicine in general. Sufficient data has been collected to now describe with good reliability the practice of young family physicians and to identify trends over time in the specialty. Most importantly, researchers can use these data to test research hypotheses about the impact of family medicine training on graduate practice—true outcomes-based research of medical education.

A growing concern in the program director community is the scope of practice for our graduates. The NGS is a good tool to measure this for programs and the specialty as a whole. The survey annually asks graduates to report whether they felt adequately trained for a procedure or area of practice and whether they are currently providing this service. Over time, several emerging areas of practice such as Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) have been added to the survey. The combined self-reported training and provision of areas of practice for graduates between 2013 and 2016 is in Figure 1 and procedures in Figure 2. Most areas of practice and procedures were stable over these 4 years. Notable exceptions were placing implantable contraceptive devices such as Nexplanon with respondents receiving adequate training increasing from 61% to 82% and performing in practice increasing from 33% to 48%. With the 2012 changes to cervical cancer screening guidelines, many family medicine clinics following updated guidelines are performing fewer pap smears and have fewer patients who require colposcopy. Graduates feeling prepared to perform colposcopy decreased from 60% to 48%, though graduates currently practicing this procedure remained steady at 14% to 13%. Other areas with a notable decrease in graduates feeling prepared and practicing were HIV/AIDS (prepared 31% to 25%; practicing 21% to 14%) and Hepatitis C (prepared 30% to 23%; practicing 25% to 13%). A growing area of need for our public’s health is more family physicians prescribing buprenorphine. Unfortunately, over this time period there was not a significant increase in graduates reporting feeling trained (only increasing from 10% to 12%) and only a small absolute increase in graduates who report prescribing buprenorphine (increasing from 7% to 12%).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

National ABFM/AFMRD Graduate Survey scope of practice.

OB = obstetrics; ICU-CCU = intensive/critical care unit

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

National ABFM/AFMRD Graduate Survey scope of practice—procedures.

Bx = biopsy; IuD = intrauterine device; Asp = aspiration; D & C = dilation and curettage; OB US = obstetrics ultrasound; MSK US - musculoskeletal ultrasound; POCUS = point-of-care ulstrasound; OMT = osteopathic manipulative treatment.

This national standardized data of our graduates are important for program directors, department chairs, and sponsoring institutions to measure whether they are meeting the mission, values, and goals for their programs. This was the primary goal for the original design for the NGS. As we are trying to recruit more students into our specialty and we continue to demonstrate our value to our communities and the US health system, these data are also an important resource as outcome measures for our programs. If program directors share their program data with medical students, students can be better guided to look for programs that meet their own personal training needs.

  • © 2020 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Mitchell KB,
    2. Maxwell L,
    3. Miller T
    . Te National Graduate Survey for family medicine. Ann Fam Med. 2015; 13(6): 595–596. doi: 10.1370/afm.1874.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 18 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine
Vol. 18, Issue 5
September/October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
IDENTIFYING TRENDS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT USING REPORTS FROM THE NATIONAL GRADUATE SURVEY FOR FAMILY MEDICINE
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
IDENTIFYING TRENDS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT USING REPORTS FROM THE NATIONAL GRADUATE SURVEY FOR FAMILY MEDICINE
Wendy Barr, Jessie M. Pettit
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2020, 18 (5) 473-475; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2597

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
IDENTIFYING TRENDS AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT USING REPORTS FROM THE NATIONAL GRADUATE SURVEY FOR FAMILY MEDICINE
Wendy Barr, Jessie M. Pettit
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2020, 18 (5) 473-475; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2597
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Departments

  • FROM AAFP: AAFP ADVANCES ON LONG-TERM CLINICAL RECOMMENDATION PROJECT
  • Addendum to: Karlin J. Sam’s story: the financial and human costs of disjointed logics of care. Ann Fam Med. 2022;20(1):84-87.
  • FROM ADFM: KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND SKILLS FOR FAMILY MEDICINE LEADERS: COMPETENCIES FOR SUCCESS
Show more Departments

Family Medicine Updates

  • FROM AAFP: AAFP ADVANCES ON LONG-TERM CLINICAL RECOMMENDATION PROJECT
  • Addendum to: Karlin J. Sam’s story: the financial and human costs of disjointed logics of care. Ann Fam Med. 2022;20(1):84-87.
  • FROM ADFM: KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND SKILLS FOR FAMILY MEDICINE LEADERS: COMPETENCIES FOR SUCCESS
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2022 Annals of Family Medicine