Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Clinical Quality Measure Exchange is Not Easy

Robert L. Phillips, Lars Peterson, Ted E. Palen, Scott A. Fields, Michael L. Parchman and John Johannides
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2021, 19 (3) 207-211; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2649
Robert L. Phillips
1American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bphillips@theabfm.org
Lars Peterson
1American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ted E. Palen
2Colorado Permanente Medical Group, Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado
PhD, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott A. Fields
3OCHIN, Portland, Oregon
MD, MHA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael L. Parchman
4Kaiser Permanente of Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Johannides
1American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
PMP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    TRADEMaRQ-Enrolled Physicians

    Health SystemNumber Enrolled
    Control125
    Kaiser Permanente Washington90
    Kaiser Permanente Colorado66
    OCHIN94
    Southeast Texas Medical Associates   6
    Total256
    • OCHIN = a nonprofit health care innovation center focused on the needs of community health centers, small practices and critical access hospitals; TRADEMaRQ = Trial of Aggregate Data Exchange for Maintenance of certification and Raising Quality.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    TRADEMaRQ Measures across Participating Health Systems

    CMS eMeasure IDNQF #Measure TitleKPWAKPCOOCHINSETMA
    CMS165v218Controlling High Blood PressureXXXX
    CMS138v228Smoking Cessation CounselingXX
    CMS125v231Breast Cancer ScreeningXXXX
    CMS124v232Cervical Cancer ScreeningXXXX
    CMS130v234Colorectal Cancer ScreeningXXXX
    CMS147v241Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza ImmunizationXX
    CMS127v243Pneumonia Vaccination Status for Older AdultsXX
    CMS131v255Diabetes: Eye ExamXXXX
    CMS123v256Diabetes: Foot ExamXXX
    CMS122v259Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor ControlXXX
    CMS134v262Diabetes: Urine Protein ScreeningXXX
    CMS163v264Diabetes: Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) ManagementXX
    CMS164v268Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD): Use of Aspirin or Another AntithromboticXX
    CMS145v270Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): Beta-Blocker Therapy—Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI) or Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVEF <40%)XX
    CMS182v375Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD): Complete Lipid Panel and LDL ControlXX
    CMS135v281Heart Failure (HF): Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)XXX
    CMS144v283Heart Failure (HF): Beta-Blocker Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)X
    CMS2v3418Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for Clinical Depression and Follow-Up PlanX
    CMS68v3419Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical RecordXX
    • CMS = Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services; NQF = National Quality Forum; KPWA = Kaiser Permanente Washington; KPCO = Kaiser Permanente Colorado; SETMA = Southeast Texas Medical Associates; OCHIN = OCHIN is a nonprofit health care innovation center focused on the needs of community health centers, small practices and critical access hospitals.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Common Measure Delivery or Receipt Errors and Hazards Experienced in TRADEMaRQ

    Error TypesExamplesFix
    Measure miscalculationIncorrect numerator or denominator
    Measures calculated incorrectly sent from inception, noticed 11 months after system launch
    Incorrect data period (measurement period required 12 months, but 11 months used)
    Incorrect denominator inclusion criteria used for greater than 1 year
    Numerator >denominator error
    Patient panel (erroneously) reduced to 0
    Physician moved clinics and changed panels so that measures could not be reconciled; removed from the study
    Significant change in scores for 5 measures
    Corrected data sent and uploaded manually after manual removal of incorrect data
    Revised measure calculations
    Error caught internally and repaired; delayed transmission
    Fixed reporting period compression error
    Data delivery errorDelay in data delivery
    Blank file sent
    Incorrect NQF number attached to file
    Corrected, resent, manual data replacement
    Non-enrolled physician data sentPhysician data sent before they were enrolled/randomized
    Ineligible physician data sent
    Physician enrolled and randomized or excluded
    Data reporting interruptedPhysician data reported for one period but not another
    Internal system change caused a measure to not get reported
    Source database moved and transmission credentials not configured
    Critical subsystem source failure, 6-week delay
    Updated files sent and manually uploaded
    Host receiving server not runningSystem update interruptionServer brought back online
    Third party errorsTwo years into study, learned that a third-party company was doing measure management and transmitting incorrectly
    Third-party processes caused several month delays in file transmission around turn of calendar year
    Worked directly with vendor to correct calculation or transmission errors
    Files caught up once data sent by third party
    • NQF = National Quality Forum; TRADEMaRQ = Trial of Aggregate Data Exchange for Maintenance of certification and Raising Quality.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Clinical Quality Measure Exchange Is Not Easy


    Robert L. Phillips, Jr , and colleagues

    Background Family physicians provide nearly 20% of all clinical outpatient visits, translating to 200 million visits in the U.S. annually, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Frontline clinicians continue to report failures of certified electronic health records (EHRs) to meet federal certification requirements and electronic reporting needs.


    What This Study Found Researchers created the Trial of Aggregate Data Exchange for Maintenance of certification and Raising Quality, a randomized controlled trial, to assess whether quality measure reporting could be made a byproduct of clinical care and quality improvement. They recruited family physicians from four health systems. A total of 256 family physicians participated. Of 19 measures negotiated for use, five were used by all systems. The researchers identified 15 types of errors, including breaks in data delivery; changes in measures; and nonsensical measure results. Only one system had no identified errors.
     
    The study concluded that the secure transfer of standardized, physician-level quality measures from the four health systems, despite their having mature processes in place, proved difficult. There were many errors that required human intervention and manual repair, which precluded full automation.


    Implications    

    • The study reconfirms that despite widespread health information technology adoption and federally meaningful use policies, health care remains far from reaching its goals of making clinical quality reporting a reliable byproduct of care.
     
          
  • Supplemental data

    PDF file

    • Supplemental data -

      PDF file

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (3)
Vol. 19, Issue 3
1 May 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • The Issue In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Quality Measure Exchange is Not Easy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Clinical Quality Measure Exchange is Not Easy
Robert L. Phillips, Lars Peterson, Ted E. Palen, Scott A. Fields, Michael L. Parchman, John Johannides
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2021, 19 (3) 207-211; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2649

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Clinical Quality Measure Exchange is Not Easy
Robert L. Phillips, Lars Peterson, Ted E. Palen, Scott A. Fields, Michael L. Parchman, John Johannides
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2021, 19 (3) 207-211; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2649
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Physicians Choice of Board Certification Activity Is Unaffected by Baseline Quality of Care: The TRADEMaRQ Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
  • Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Cross-disciplinary
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Other topics:
    • Health informatics
    • Organizational / practice change

Keywords

  • health information technology
  • quality measures
  • family physicians
  • quality indicators
  • health care
  • certification

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine