Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleSystematic Review

Clinical Features for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hanne A. Boon, Ann Van den Bruel, Thomas Struyf, Andreas Gillemot, Dominique Bullens and Jan Y. Verbakel
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2021, 19 (5) 437-446; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2684
Hanne A. Boon
1EPI-Centre, Academic Centre for Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann Van den Bruel
1EPI-Centre, Academic Centre for Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Struyf
1EPI-Centre, Academic Centre for Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Gillemot
1EPI-Centre, Academic Centre for Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominique Bullens
3Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
4Clinical Division of Pediatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Y. Verbakel
1EPI-Centre, Academic Centre for Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jan.verbakel@kuleuven.be
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE Accurate diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children is essential because children left untreated can experience permanent renal injury. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of clinical features of pediatric urinary tract infection.

METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies in ambulatory care. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health Technology Assessment, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects databases from inception to January 27, 2020 for studies reporting 2 × 2 diagnostic accuracy data for clinical features compared with urine culture in children aged <18 years. For each clinical feature, we calculated likelihood ratios and posttest probabilities of urinary tract infection. To estimate summary parameters, we conducted a bivariate random effects meta-analysis and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS A total of 35 studies (N = 78,427 patients) of moderate to high quality were included, providing information on 58 clinical features and 6 prediction rules. Only circumcision (negative likelihood ratio [LR–] 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.72; n = 8), stridor (LR– 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.81; n = 1), and diaper rash (LR– 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.92; n = 1) were useful for ruling out urinary tract infection. Body temperature or fever duration showed limited diagnostic value (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.73; n = 16). The Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Young Children score, Gorelick Scale score, and UTIcalc (https://uticalc.pitt.edu) might be useful to identify children eligible for urine sampling.

CONCLUSIONS Few clinical signs and symptoms are useful for diagnosing or ruling out urinary tract infection in children. Clinical prediction rules might be more accurate; however, they should be validated externally. Physicians should not restrict urine sampling to children with unexplained fever or other features suggestive of urinary tract infection.

Key words:
  • primary care issues
  • urinary tract problems
  • special population: children/infants
  • special population: adolescents
  • quantitative methods: meta-analysis
  • diagnostic testing
  • Received for publication July 24, 2020.
  • Revision received November 23, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication December 3, 2020.
  • © 2021 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (5)
Vol. 19, Issue 5
1 Sep 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Features for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Clinical Features for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hanne A. Boon, Ann Van den Bruel, Thomas Struyf, Andreas Gillemot, Dominique Bullens, Jan Y. Verbakel
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2021, 19 (5) 437-446; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2684

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Clinical Features for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hanne A. Boon, Ann Van den Bruel, Thomas Struyf, Andreas Gillemot, Dominique Bullens, Jan Y. Verbakel
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2021, 19 (5) 437-446; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2684
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • GPs perspectives on diagnosing childhood urinary tract infections: a qualitative study
  • Clinical prediction rules for childhood urinary tract infections: a cross-sectional study in ambulatory care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Chest Pain in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Risk Stratification Tools to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Regimen for Mild/Moderately Severe COVID-19: A Rapid Review With Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
  • Clinically Important Benefits and Harms of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Amyloid for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Show more Systematic Review

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Acute illness
  • Person groups:
    • Children's health
  • Other research types:
    • Health services

Keywords

  • primary care issues
  • urinary tract problems
  • special population: children/infants
  • special population: adolescents
  • quantitative methods: meta-analysis
  • diagnostic testing

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine