Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
EditorialEditorial

Trust and Relationships Remain at the Heart of Primary Care

Kenneth W. Lin
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2021, 19 (6) 482-483; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2752
Kenneth W. Lin
Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: KWL4@georgetown.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
Key words:
  • trust
  • primary care issues: clinician-patient communication/relationship
  • empathy
  • health care organizational culture
  • health care teams
  • peer health coaching
  • COVID-19

Trust in medicine is at a low ebb. Although 3 highly effective, safe vaccines against a highly contagious virus that has caused at least 728,000 US deaths have been widely available at no cost (often accompanied by financial incentives) since the spring of 2021, nearly 1 in 5 adults has not received a single dose.1 A small but vocal minority of health professionals has opposed COVID-19 vaccination; the American Boards of Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Pediatrics recently issued a statement threatening to revoke certification of physicians who spread vaccine misinformation.2 As mass vaccination campaigns have stalled, recommendations from trusted primary care clinicians have become critical to overcoming vaccine hesitancy.3

Institutional trust and a few basic communication practices4 can be sufficient for a patient to connect with a physician during a single encounter, but patients develop more secure expectations of their physicians through repeated interactions over time.4,5,6 Via trusting relationships, continuity of care is associated with lower costs and improved patient outcomes.8 This issue of Annals includes several papers that explore aspects of trust and relationships in primary care.

Whether to open the “Pandora’s box” of psychological issues underlying the ostensible reason for a primary care visit (eg, depression manifesting as back pain) can be a tricky decision for a clinician who is determined to stay on schedule. In a qualitative and quantitative analysis of audio-recorded encounters in HIV specialty clinics, Beach and colleagues question a prior study’s finding that attending with empathy to patient emotions shortens visit length.9 They found that as visit time elapsed, clinicians were less likely to give patients opportunities to elaborate on negative emotions (“provide space”) and more likely to respond explicitly to an emotional expression; these less-empathic communication styles were associated with slightly shorter visits. Readers can judge if saving about 2 minutes per visit is worth what was potentially lost in these encounters.

Compared with clinician-patient relationships, the care implications of clinicians’ attitudes toward health care organizations have been relatively understudied. Using baseline data from a randomized trial of work-life interventions in 34 primary care clinics, Linzer and colleagues identify 4 features of organizational culture correlated with the combination of high clinician trust in the organization and high patient trust in the clinician: emphasis on quality, emphasis on communication and information, clinician cohesion, and clinician-leader value alignment.10 Organizations that devote time and energy to optimizing these features may have happier clinicians and more satisfied patients.

Some patients with complex chronic conditions benefit from additional supportive relationships outside of the primary care team. Turner and colleagues explore the characteristics of patients who declined enrollment and trial participants with different levels of engagement in a peer health-coaching program for veterans with type 2 diabetes.11 Compared with patients who did not enroll, participants reported higher levels of education and greater perceived need for assistance in managing their diabetes; those who engaged in the intervention described their coaches as being more supportive of their autonomy. Although this study’s predominantly Black male population limits its generalizability, its findings may help in targeting similar interventions when resources are limited.

Different generations of primary care clinicians may value different kinds of relationships. Two other papers in this issue illustrate the tension between the priorities of independent physicians and those of groups of clinicians employed by a health care organization. In a narrative essay, Loxterkamp observes that living in the same small community as his patients for 3 decades taught him the value of care continuity as defined as a single physician (rather than a “team”) caring for a patient through the duration of their illness.12 By largely abandoning continuity for “the transactional world of episodic care,” he suggests that primary care physicians have given up “our trust and belief in the value of relationships.” In contrast, Matulis and Barakat describe an informal cases conference for early-career primary care internists and advanced practice clinicians that reduced isolation by creating a virtual community that evoked the hospital doctors’ lounge or a pre-COVID communal break room.13 After the first year, participants reported statistically significant improvements in sense of belonging and enthusiasm about their work.

As a mid-career family physician whose experience straddles those of the recent residency graduate and the doctor contemplating retirement, I appreciate both perspectives. My role models in medical school and residency were the archetypes of Loxterkamp’s day, physicians who prized their autonomy and worked around the clock until all the patient care was done. But more than half of today’s primary care physicians, like me, are employees of non-physician–owned practices,14 and our relationships with these organizations are as critical to sustaining our joy in practice as relationships with our patients. There are also advantages to belonging to a large group of health professionals during a pandemic. As I continue promoting COVID-19 vaccines for patients with low levels of trust in the medical system, it helps to know that my practice team and health care organization have my back.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • To read or post commentaries in response to this article, go to https://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/19/6/482/tab-e-letters.

  • Received for publication September 17, 2021.
  • Accepted for publication September 17, 2021.
  • © 2021 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    . COVID data tracker; COVID-19 vaccinations in the United States. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-total-admin-rate-total
  2. 2.↵
    1. American Board of Family Medicine
    . Joint statement from the American Board of Family Medicine, American Board of Internal Medicine, and American Board of Pediatrics on dissemination of misinformation by board certified physicins about COVID-19. Published Sep 9, 2021. https://www.theabfm.org/about/communications/news/joint-statement-american-board-family-medicine-american-board-internal
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lin K
    . Commentary; To fix COVID vaccine hesitancy, trust primary care. Medscape. Published Mar 30, 2021. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/948281
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zulman DM,
    2. Haverfield MC,
    3. Shaw JG, et al.
    Practices to foster physician presence and connection with patients in the clinical encounter. JAMA. 2020; 323(1): 70-81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tarrant C,
    2. Dixon-Woods M,
    3. Colman AM,
    4. Stokes T
    . Continuity and trust in primary care: a qualitative study informed by game theory. Ann Fam Med. 2010; 8(5): 440-446.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cocksedge S,
    2. Greenfield R,
    3. Nugent GK,
    4. Chew-Graham C
    . Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative exploration of doctors’ and patients’ perceptions. Br J Gen Pract. 2011; 61(589): e484-e491.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    1. Nowak DA,
    2. Sheikhan NY,
    3. Naidu SC,
    4. Kuluski K,
    5. Upshur REG
    . Why does continuity of care with family doctors matter? Review and qualitative synthesis of patient and physician perspectives. Can Fam Physician. 2021; 67(9): 679-688.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bazemore A,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Peterson LE,
    4. Bruno R,
    5. Chung Y,
    6. Phillips RL Jr..
    Higher primary care physician continuity is associated with lower costs and hospitalizations. Ann Fam Med. 2018; 16(6): 492-497.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Beach MC, et al.
    Clinician response to patient emotion: impact on subsequent communication and visit length. Ann Fam Med. 2021; 19(6): 515-520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Linzer M, et al.
    Where trust flourishes: perceptions of clinicians who trust their organizations and are trusted by their patients. Ann Fam Med. 2021; 19(6): 521-526.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Turner CD,
    2. Lindsay R,
    3. Heisler M
    . Peer coaching to improve diabetes self-management among low-income Black veteran men: a mixed methods assessment of enrollment and engagement. Ann Fam Med. 2021; 19(6): 532-539.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Loxterkamp D
    . The lost pillar. Does continuity of care still matter? Ann Fam Med.2021;19(6): 553-555.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Matulis JC,
    2. Barakat S
    . Implementation of a “cases and conundrums” conference among early career internal medicine clinicians. Ann Fam Med. 2021;19(6): 560.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Willis J,
    2. Antono B,
    3. Bazemore A, et al.
    The state of primary care in the United States: a chartbook of facts and statistics. Robert Graham Center. Published Feb 2021. Accessed Sep 14, 2021. https://www.graham-center.org/content/dam/rgc/documents/publications-reports/reports/PrimaryCareChartbook2021.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
Vol. 19, Issue 6
1 Nov 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain language article summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Trust and Relationships Remain at the Heart of Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Trust and Relationships Remain at the Heart of Primary Care
Kenneth W. Lin
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2021, 19 (6) 482-483; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2752

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Trust and Relationships Remain at the Heart of Primary Care
Kenneth W. Lin
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2021, 19 (6) 482-483; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2752
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Thank You, Reviewers and E-Letter Contributors!
  • Growing Evidence Supports an Implementation Shift Toward Vaginal Sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis Screening
  • Obstacles and Opportunities on the Path to Improving Health Professions Education and Practice: Lessons From HRSA’s Academic Units for Primary Care Training and Enhancement
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Core values of primary care:
    • Continuity
    • Personalized care
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • COVID-19
    • Communication / decision making

Keywords

  • trust
  • primary care issues: clinician-patient communication/relationship
  • empathy
  • health care organizational culture
  • health care teams
  • peer health coaching
  • COVID-19

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine