Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Improving Quality Improvement Capacity and Clinical Performance in Small Primary Care Practices

Katie F. Coleman, Chloe Krakauer, Melissa Anderson, LeAnn Michaels, David A. Dorr, Lyle J. Fagnan, Clarissa Hsu and Michael L. Parchman
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2021, 19 (6) 499-506; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2733
Katie F. Coleman
1Center for Accelerating Care Transformation (previously MacColl Center), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: katie.f.coleman@kp.org
Chloe Krakauer
2Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
PhD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa Anderson
2Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LeAnn Michaels
3Oregon Rural Practice Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Dorr
4Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lyle J. Fagnan
3Oregon Rural Practice Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clarissa Hsu
1Center for Accelerating Care Transformation (previously MacColl Center), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael L. Parchman
1Center for Accelerating Care Transformation (previously MacColl Center), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RE:
    Linnaea C Schuttner
    Published on: 07 February 2022
  • Published on: (7 February 2022)
    Page navigation anchor for RE:
    RE:
    • Linnaea C Schuttner, Physician, VA Puget Sound Health Care System

    To the editors and authors,

    The recent publication by K. Coleman et al. is the latest in a series describing outcomes from a randomized trial of external support strategies for cardiovascular care quality improvement in small and medium-sized primary care practices. This paper describes how the change in a measure of quality improvement capacity or QICA (i.e., activities, processes, and skills) from baseline to follow-up was associated with changes in clinical quality process measures (aspirin use, blood pressure control, and smoking). Previous work by these authors (Parchman et al., BMC Fam Practice (2019) 20:103) described baseline correlations between the QICA and clinical quality process measures. The novelty and importance of this current paper is topical to practices and healthcare organizations seeking to measure and invest in quality improvement (QI) capacity. While historic focus has been on capturing the downstream results of quality improvement activities via clinical outcomes and process measures, little work outside of the QICA has gone into developing tools to help smaller practices build and evaluate their abilities to conduct quality improvement. The QICA serves this purpose, and this paper provides a much-needed confirmation that investment in and use of the QICA has dividends clinically.

    Several implications of this paper deserve note. First, the QICA domains could be conceptualized as practice standards in order to target activities and pr...

    Show More

    To the editors and authors,

    The recent publication by K. Coleman et al. is the latest in a series describing outcomes from a randomized trial of external support strategies for cardiovascular care quality improvement in small and medium-sized primary care practices. This paper describes how the change in a measure of quality improvement capacity or QICA (i.e., activities, processes, and skills) from baseline to follow-up was associated with changes in clinical quality process measures (aspirin use, blood pressure control, and smoking). Previous work by these authors (Parchman et al., BMC Fam Practice (2019) 20:103) described baseline correlations between the QICA and clinical quality process measures. The novelty and importance of this current paper is topical to practices and healthcare organizations seeking to measure and invest in quality improvement (QI) capacity. While historic focus has been on capturing the downstream results of quality improvement activities via clinical outcomes and process measures, little work outside of the QICA has gone into developing tools to help smaller practices build and evaluate their abilities to conduct quality improvement. The QICA serves this purpose, and this paper provides a much-needed confirmation that investment in and use of the QICA has dividends clinically.

    Several implications of this paper deserve note. First, the QICA domains could be conceptualized as practice standards in order to target activities and process related to specific clinical areas. However, as pointed out in this article, disparate clinical areas may not universally benefit from QI capacity development, and uneven, nonlinear, progress should be expected. As clear from this paper and prior work, growth in the QICA was intertwined with the clinical topic of achieving blood pressure (BP) control for these practices. This was likely related to initially higher focus on BP as a key clinical quality domain (as briefly noted by the authors). The association between the change in QICA and change in BP control makes sense; Practice baseline QICA scores were most strongly validated for the domains associated with BP control (i.e., having a QI process, self-management support, and linking patients to resources), while baseline performance for aspirin use and smoking cessation were less consistently associated (i.e., only through identification of at-risk patients and utilization of data respectively). The baseline data submitted by practices was also worse (less valid) for aspirin and smoking than for BP, suggesting BP data may have had existing infrastructure support.

    Second, while it was not conceptually explored in this paper, a previous analysis I completed with this group (Schuttner et al., Health Care Management Review (2021) 46:2) explored the nuances of the development of capacity for change as a function of both internal (e.g., higher order learning within the practice and resilience for the change process) and external (e.g., external resources or alignment within a larger health system) capacity. We concluded that these dimensions of internal capacity for the change process may be a prerequisite to actualized processes and activities for QI as captured in the QICA, and may subsequently be a cornerstone of clinical process changes. The contributions from external capacity and infrastructure to QI capacity development and to clinical performance measures were less clear (of practices in our analysis, 40% were aligned with larger health systems and 46% reported centralized QI support structures). Additionally, external influences such as the CMS Innovation project, the Million Hearts Initiative (2012-2016), may have also led to differential growth in performance on clinical measures.

    In summary, the current publication further supports the use of an instrument like the QICA to both guide and evaluate QI capacity development. While more investigation is needed into translating that capacity into clinical process and outcome measure change, this study is a promising step in strengthening the argument for investing in QI capacity in order to make an appreciable impact on primary care quality for small and medium-sized practices.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: I have previously collaborated with Drs. Coleman, Anderson, Michaels, Fagnan, Hsu, and Parchman on prior research that relates to the current manuscript. The current letter and opinions within are my own, and do not represent the viewpoints of the current manuscript authors nor my affiliated institutions.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
Vol. 19, Issue 6
1 Nov 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain language article summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving Quality Improvement Capacity and Clinical Performance in Small Primary Care Practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Improving Quality Improvement Capacity and Clinical Performance in Small Primary Care Practices
Katie F. Coleman, Chloe Krakauer, Melissa Anderson, LeAnn Michaels, David A. Dorr, Lyle J. Fagnan, Clarissa Hsu, Michael L. Parchman
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2021, 19 (6) 499-506; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2733

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Improving Quality Improvement Capacity and Clinical Performance in Small Primary Care Practices
Katie F. Coleman, Chloe Krakauer, Melissa Anderson, LeAnn Michaels, David A. Dorr, Lyle J. Fagnan, Clarissa Hsu, Michael L. Parchman
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2021, 19 (6) 499-506; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2733
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Implementing a Rapid Improvement Event with anonymised individual performance reporting on benign hysterectomy care: a retrospective comparative analysis
  • The Ability of Primary Care Practices to Measure and Report on Care Quality
  • Effective Facilitator Strategies for Supporting Primary Care Practice Change: A Mixed Methods Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement

Keywords

  • practice facilitation
  • high-leverage change
  • quality improvement
  • cardiovascular disease
  • risk factors
  • preventive medicine
  • evidence-based practice
  • clinical quality measure
  • Healthy Hearts North-west study
  • EvidenceNOW
  • AHRQ
  • organizational innovation

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine