Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Critical Review

John W. Saultz and Waleed Albedaiwi
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2004, 2 (5) 445-451; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.91
John W. Saultz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Waleed Albedaiwi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Measuring interpersonal continuity
    John W. Saultz
    Published on: 13 November 2004
  • Interpersonal continuity and health system reform
    John W. Saultz
    Published on: 12 November 2004
  • Importance of measuring the interpersonal element of continuity
    George K Freeman
    Published on: 09 November 2004
  • Continuity of care in a changing health care system.
    Elizabeth A. Bayliss
    Published on: 21 October 2004
  • continuity and patient satisfaction
    Richard Baker
    Published on: 12 October 2004
  • Published on: (13 November 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for Measuring interpersonal continuity
    Measuring interpersonal continuity
    • John W. Saultz, Portland, Oregon

    I am flattered that Professor Freeman enjoyed our paper on interpersonal continuity and I agree that this is a very difficult topic for family physicians to study objectively. For many of us, ongoing relationships with our patients is the primary characteristic that attracted us to family medicine as a career choice. Having spent hundreds of hours reading these papers, I honestly don't think that a truely skeptical pol...

    Show More

    I am flattered that Professor Freeman enjoyed our paper on interpersonal continuity and I agree that this is a very difficult topic for family physicians to study objectively. For many of us, ongoing relationships with our patients is the primary characteristic that attracted us to family medicine as a career choice. Having spent hundreds of hours reading these papers, I honestly don't think that a truely skeptical policy analyst would be impressed much by this body of evidence. Our discipline has a longstanding history of using cross-sectional methods to study common health problems and issues. There is no aspect of family medicine that is less suited to such methods than continuity of care, an inherently longitudinal concept.

    I agree that our research often measures longitudinal continuity when we seek to study interpersonal continuity. I consider the following questions most relevant to our efforts to quantify interpersonal continuity:

    1. Can the patient name an indivudual when asked if they have a personal physician (identification)? 2. If so, how long have they been under this person's care (duration)? 3. What percent of their visits are with this person (longitudinal care)? 4. How much does this personal relationship mean to the patient(qualitative value)? 5. Are they willing to wait longer or pay more or travel farther for such personal care (measurable value)?

    Finally, I think we need additional research addressing how interpersonal continuity fails. Imagine ten new patients coming to a family physicians office for the first time. Which ones will still be in the practice one year, five years, and ten years later? What patient, physician, and practice characteristics predict who will stay and who won't? We will have to have the patience to conduct cohort studies over a period of years to answer these questions. But we aren't going to understand interpersonal continuity until such studies are done.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (12 November 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for Interpersonal continuity and health system reform
    Interpersonal continuity and health system reform
    • John W. Saultz, Portland, Oregon

    Dr. Elizabeth A. Bayliss finds it unlikely that every family physician will be able to provide comprehensive and continuing care to any patient as American health care becomes more complex. I think this depends on how we choose to define comprehensive care. Once upon a time, most of America's family physicians were in solo practice. But this hasn't been the case for over a generation now, and we have never really come...

    Show More

    Dr. Elizabeth A. Bayliss finds it unlikely that every family physician will be able to provide comprehensive and continuing care to any patient as American health care becomes more complex. I think this depends on how we choose to define comprehensive care. Once upon a time, most of America's family physicians were in solo practice. But this hasn't been the case for over a generation now, and we have never really come to terms with what group practice means to our care model. To me, it is a mistake to equate competence in caring for a disease with the skills needed to care for a patient. Very few of us practice on an island. We have partners, colleagues, and consultants. The real question we are trying to address in our research on interpersonal continuity is, "what should be the primary unit of patient trust and provider responsibility?" For many of our patients, health care is a personal service between two people, regardless of how many teammates stand behind the identified personal physician. We need to understand which patients feel this way and why before we get too far into the process of redesigning American health care.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (9 November 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for Importance of measuring the interpersonal element of continuity
    Importance of measuring the interpersonal element of continuity
    • George K Freeman, London
    I really enjoyed the paper from Saultz and Albedaiwi (1). I agree that interpersonal continuity of care is the element of CoC most relevant to primary care/general/family practice. It is indeed crucial to know if it makes a difference. Therefore, like Stewart in her magisterial editorial (2), I am much encouraged by these positive findings. But most writers about continuity of care are enthusiasts for it and as academics we sho...
    Show More
    I really enjoyed the paper from Saultz and Albedaiwi (1). I agree that interpersonal continuity of care is the element of CoC most relevant to primary care/general/family practice. It is indeed crucial to know if it makes a difference. Therefore, like Stewart in her magisterial editorial (2), I am much encouraged by these positive findings. But most writers about continuity of care are enthusiasts for it and as academics we should not deceive ourselves. I wonder how much this paper would convince a skeptical policy maker. Indeed, there may be selection bias in that enthusiasts may wittingly or unwittingly select their most positive findings for submission, and editors tend to prefer positive findings. My own judgement is that evidence for the overall benefits of interpersonal continuity of care is as yet all too limited. Patient satisfaction is itself a problematic measure. It has the great strength of being generic, as Stewart says. But satisfaction levels in primary care tend to be high and do not capture patients more specific feelings. Also satisfaction tells us little about how better interpersonal CoC works or about other benefits (or harms). More important, patients have competing priorities, particularly quick access, and so, even if satisfied, they may not be willing to wait for a practitioner they know and like. I was really interested in the discussion section. I agree that a prospective recruitment survey of newly registered patients is highly desirable and I am hoping to undertake such a study in the UK over the next 2-3 years. I have two other queries: 1 We need more on how to improve interpersonal continuity. Kibbe et al’s impressive study (3) is now 11 years old but I’m unaware of a sequel. Were the reported higher levels of same provider continuity maintained and were there associated measurable benefits? 2 Measurement of interpersonal continuity remains a challenge. Saultz and Albedawi hint at the difficulty in inferring the strength of a therapeutic relationship from studies that essentially measure contacts, at best asking patients whether they can identify their physician. Haggerty et al (4) have defined relational continuity as an ongoing therapeutic relationship between a patient and one or more providers. Saultz has previously noted (5) that relational continuity is similar to interpersonal continuity. But quantitative measures merely tell us about contacts, they say nothing about whether the relationship (if any) was therapeutic) So how can we measure relational or interpersonal continuity most easily and cheaply? Any suggestions? References 1 Saultz JW, Albedawi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:445-451. 2 Stewart M. Continuity, Care, and Commitment: The Course of Patient-Clinician Relationships. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:388-390. 3 Kibbe DC, Bentz E, McLaughlin CP. Continuous quality improvement for quality of care. Journal of Family Practice 1993;36:304-308. 4 Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK et al. Continuity of Care: a multidisciplinary review. Br Med J 2003;327:1219-1221. 5 Saultz JW. Defining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:134-143

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (21 October 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for Continuity of care in a changing health care system.
    Continuity of care in a changing health care system.
    • Elizabeth A. Bayliss, Denver, CO

    In their article, Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Critical Review (1), Drs. Saultz and Albedaiwi review the literature on one of the basic tenets of Family Medicine. In doing so they emerge with a consistent message: higher levels of interpersonal continuity of care correlate with higher levels of patient satisfaction. Not only is it reassuring to be reminded that this part of the definition...

    Show More

    In their article, Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Critical Review (1), Drs. Saultz and Albedaiwi review the literature on one of the basic tenets of Family Medicine. In doing so they emerge with a consistent message: higher levels of interpersonal continuity of care correlate with higher levels of patient satisfaction. Not only is it reassuring to be reminded that this part of the definition of both family practice and primary care still holds true (2), it is particularly important to do so in the face of potential changes in our health care system.

    As we take a critical look at a health care system based on an acute care model and contemplate needed changes, it is worth noting what ‘matters’ to patients. However, it may be worth asking when it matters as well. We care for an increasing population of persons with chronic, not acute, medical conditions. We provide recommended preventive services (estimated to consume up to 7.4 hours per physician per day) (3). Should all care be delivered in the office visit? If so, is it important (or even possible) to have interpersonal continuity of care for each visit? Are there categories of visits for which interpersonal continuity of care matters more or less? Are there ways that we can use appropriate technologies to incorporate some population-based care into continuous relationships? It would be helpful to know if patients prefer, for example, continuity for chronic visits, but less for visits for minor acute illness. Or, as another example, whether interpersonal continuity can be maintained within an office where some preventive care is orchestrated by a nurse specialist.

    As our health care system evolves, I think it is unlikely that each primary care physician will be able to provide “comprehensive and continuing” care that addresses all of the acute, chronic, and preventive needs of all patients. Both patients and physicians have weighed in on the value of interpersonal continuity of care. The start of a satisfactory re- engineering of primary health care lies in the shared space where our priorities match. Let us use that knowledge to build an effective and efficient twenty-first century health care system.

    1. Saultz JW and Albedaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: A critical review. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:445-451.

    2. Definitions of Family Practice and Primary Care. American Academy of Family Physicians. www.aafp.org

    3. Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health 2003;93:635- 41.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (12 October 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for continuity and patient satisfaction
    continuity and patient satisfaction
    • Richard Baker, Leicester, UK

    Saultz and Albedaiwi have provided a useful summary of the evidence about the relationship between continuity and satisfaction.1 They also highlight the difficulties of the current evidence, including the various definitions of continuity in use, and the disadvantage of lumping all patients together - some may regard continuity as important, but others may not.

    In a recent qualitative study in primary care, we...

    Show More

    Saultz and Albedaiwi have provided a useful summary of the evidence about the relationship between continuity and satisfaction.1 They also highlight the difficulties of the current evidence, including the various definitions of continuity in use, and the disadvantage of lumping all patients together - some may regard continuity as important, but others may not.

    In a recent qualitative study in primary care, we approached the issue from a different direction.2 In investigating personal care, it became clear that consulting the same provider could facilitate personal care, but it was also possible to provide aspects of personal care in a consultation between strangers. When patients had complex problems, they tended to prefer to consult the provider with whom they had already established a relationship.

    In the United Kingdom, we are experiencing a flood of initiatives in primary care in order to improve access. In addition to offering consultations with nurse practitioners for people with acute minor illness, many services now provide care for people with chronic disorders such as diabetes or heart disease in guideline driven clinics run by nurses. Although little or no objective data are available, it is likely that continuity is less in nurse-led primary care services. At present, therefore, there is a risk that continuity is becoming more difficult to obtain for precisely those patients who prefer it.

    At present, we seem to be muddling the systems - patients who want continuity should be able to obtain it. We have not yet found a satisfactory way to organise primary care consulting systems to reliably provide continuity to those who want it, whilst at the same time providing efficiency and quick access. Perhaps the next generation of studies of continuity should compare the experiences of the users of different provider appointment systems.

    1. Saultz JW, Albedaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:445-451.

    2. Tarrant C, Windridge K, Bolton M, Baker R, Freeman G. Qualitative study of the meaning of personal care in general practice. BMJ 2003;326:1310 (full version on bmj.com).

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine
Vol. 2, Issue 5
1 Sep 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Critical Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Critical Review
John W. Saultz, Waleed Albedaiwi
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 445-451; DOI: 10.1370/afm.91

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Critical Review
John W. Saultz, Waleed Albedaiwi
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 445-451; DOI: 10.1370/afm.91
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Exploration of the psychometric properties of the Person-Centred Primary Care Measure (PCPCM) in a Chinese primary care population in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional validation study
  • Heeding the Call for Urgent Primary Care Payment Reform: What Do We Know about How to Get Started?
  • Retrospective cohort study to investigate the 10-year trajectories of disease patterns in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus on subsequent cardiovascular outcomes and health service utilisation: a study protocol
  • Discrimination and Medical Mistrust in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample of California Adults
  • Longitudinal evaluation of a countywide alternative to the Quality and Outcomes Framework in UK General Practice aimed at improving Person Centred Coordinated Care
  • Patient trade-offs between continuity and access in primary care interprofessional teaching clinics in Canada: a cross-sectional survey using discrete choice experiment
  • Higher Primary Care Physician Continuity is Associated With Lower Costs and Hospitalizations
  • Colluding With the Decline of Continuity
  • Predicting declines in perceived relationship continuity using practice deprivation scores: a longitudinal study in primary care
  • Relation between family physician retention and avoidable hospital admission in Newfoundland and Labrador: a population-based cross-sectional study
  • Individual utilisation thresholds and exploring how GPs knowledge of their patients affects diagnosis: a qualitative study in primary care
  • Patients experiences with continuity of cancer care in Canada: Results from the CanIMPACT study
  • Effect of a national requirement to introduce named accountable general practitioners for patients aged 75 or older in England: regression discontinuity analysis of general practice utilisation and continuity of care
  • Providing end-of-life care in general practice: findings of a national GP questionnaire survey
  • Continuity of care in primary care and association with survival in older people: a 17-year prospective cohort study
  • The Personal Doctoring Manifesto: A Perspective from the Keystone IV Conference
  • Unplanned admissions and the organisational management of heart failure: a multicentre ethnographic, qualitative study
  • Changement de paradigme: Transferer la prise en charge des troubles lies a l'usage d'alcool des soins specialises aux soins primaires
  • Paradigm shift: Moving the management of alcohol use disorders from specialized care to primary care
  • Patient-doctor continuity and diagnosis of cancer: electronic medical records study in general practice
  • Continuity of Care and Avoidable Hospitalizations for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Effect of Continuity of Care on Hospital Utilization for Seniors With Multiple Medical Conditions in an Integrated Health Care System
  • Impact of Continuity of Care on Mortality and Health Care Costs: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea
  • Patients assessments of the continuity of primary care in Finland: a 15-year follow-up questionnaire survey
  • The Future Role of the Family Physician in the United States: A Rigorous Exercise in Definition
  • An Argument for Comprehensiveness as the "Special Sauce" in a Recipe for the Patient-Centered Medical Home
  • Continuity of GP care is related to reduced specialist healthcare use: a cross-sectional survey
  • Provider Practice Characteristics That Promote Interpersonal Continuity
  • Becoming a Patient-Centered Medical Home: A 9-Year Transition for a Network of Federally Qualified Health Centers
  • A new competency model for general practice: implications for selection, training, and careers
  • In This Issue: Local+Familiar=Healthier
  • Two new aspects of continuity of care
  • Continuity in different care modes and its relationship to quality of life: a randomised controlled trial in patients with COPD
  • Emotional effects of continuity of care on family physicians and the therapeutic relationship
  • Continuity: middle C--a very good place to start
  • Patient-Doctor Depth-of-Relationship Scale: Development and Validation
  • La continuite: le C du milieu - un tres bon point de depart
  • Continuity of care: Differing conceptions and values
  • 'Meeting People Where They're At': Experiences of Family Physicians Engaging Women Who Use Illicit Drugs
  • Continuity of care is good for elderly people with diabetes: Retrospective cohort study of mortality and hospitalization
  • Primary Care: A Critical Review Of The Evidence On Quality And Costs Of Health Care
  • Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home and Preventive Services Delivery
  • Does Having a Personal Physician Improve Quality of Care in Diabetes?
  • Strategies to enhance teaching about continuity of care
  • The Generalist Approach
  • How should continuity of care in primary health care be assessed?
  • Information exchange among physicians caring for the same patient in the community
  • The nature of informational continuity of care in general practice
  • Patient Reflections: Saying Good-Bye to a Retiring Family Doctor
  • Comprehending Care in a Medical Home: A Usual Source of Care and Patient Perceptions about Healthcare Communication
  • The Association of Family Continuity with Infant Health Service Use
  • Continuity of care matters
  • Patients' Commitment to Their Primary Physician and Why It Matters
  • Promoting continuity of care should be integral to any health care system
  • Patients' Perceptions of Interpersonal Continuity of Care
  • Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Care Outcomes: A Critical Review
  • In This Issue
  • Continuity, Care, and Commitment: The Course of Patient-Clinician Relationships
  • In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Determining the Association Between Continuity of Primary Care and Acute Care Use in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Evaluation of an Electronic Consultation Service for COVID-19 Care
  • General Practitioners’ Perspectives on Appropriate Use of Ultrasonography in Primary Care in Denmark: A Multistage Mixed Methods Study
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Core values of primary care:
    • Continuity
    • Relationship

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2022 Annals of Family Medicine