Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Brief

Communication Gaps Persist Between Primary Care and Specialist Physicians

Lori Timmins, Lisa M. Kern, Ann S. O’Malley, Carol Urato, Arkadipta Ghosh and Eugene Rich
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2022, 20 (4) 343-347; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2781
Lori Timmins
1Mathematica, Chicago, Illinois
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa M. Kern
2Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann S. O’Malley
3Mathematica, Washington, DC
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol Urato
3Mathematica, Washington, DC
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arkadipta Ghosh
4Mathematica, Princeton, New Jersey
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: aghosh@mathematica-mpr.com
Eugene Rich
3Mathematica, Washington, DC
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A survey conducted with data from 2008 found that physicians often do not communicate with each other at the time of referral or after consultation. Communication between physicians might have improved since then, with the dissemination of electronic health records (EHRs), but this is not known. We used 2019 survey data to measure primary care physicians’ perceptions of communication at the time of referral and after consultation. We found that large gaps in communication persist. The similarity between these survey results suggests that despite the dissemination of EHRs, physicians still do not consistently communicate with each other about the patients they share.

Key words:
  • physician communication
  • primary and specialty care
  • referral and consultation communication

INTRODUCTION

Using 2008 data, O’Malley and Reschovsky found sizeable gaps in communication among physicians caring for mutual patients.1 Poor communication has been linked to delayed diagnoses, unnecessary testing, and patient and physician dissatisfaction.2,3 Communication might have improved in the past decade with the proliferation of electronic health records (EHRs), substantial growth in the number and sizes of vertically integrated health systems, and transformation initiatives, such as the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) model, promoting coordinated care.4 We measured the extent to which primary care physicians (PCPs) report sending clinical information to specialists at the time of referral and report receiving information from specialists after consultation, using data collected in 2019 as part of the CPC+ evaluation. We also aimed to identify characteristics of beneficiaries, physicians, and practice sites that predict the likelihood of communication.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of 4,754 PCPs who responded to the CPC+ Physician Survey, which assessed PCPs’ experiences in both CPC+ and comparison (non-participating) practices. The survey was fielded August to December 2019 (2.5-3 years after CPC+ began).5

We included the following 2 previously validated survey questions1:

Question 1: “When you refer a patient to a specialist, how often do you send the specialist notification of the patient’s history and reason for the consultation?”

Question 2: “How often do you receive useful information about your referred patients from specialists?”

The response options were “Always or most of the time,” “Sometimes,” and “Seldom or never.” We examined the distribution of responses to each question and used logistic regression to predict the likelihood of responding “Always or most of the time” as a function of characteristics of (1) beneficiaries attributed to the PCPs, (2) the PCPs themselves, and (3) the practice site including its market. We supplemented the survey data with Medicare claims, enrollment, and other data sources.

We analyzed data for CPC+ and comparison practices combined. Because CPC+ has different entrance requirements for each of its 2 tracks, with more advanced care delivery requirements and payment approaches for Track 2, we analyzed practices (and their comparisons) separately by track. In total, we studied 2,289 PCPs in 1,831 CPC+ and comparison practice sites in Track 1 and 2,465 PCPs in 1,882 CPC+ and comparison practice sites in Track 2. Analyses were performed with Stata, version 16.1 (StataCorp LLC) using survey weights, with statistical significance tested at P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 22% of PCPs in each of the tracks reported that they either “Sometimes” or “Seldom or never” send clinical information to the specialist at the time of a referral (Table 1). Similarly, 35% of Track 1 and 33% of Track 2 PCPs reported that they either “Sometimes” or “Seldom or never” receive information back from the specialist after a consultation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Weighted Number and Percentage of PCPs by Response to Key Survey Questions, by CPC+ Track in 2019

The explanatory variables (60 total) together explained less than 12% of the variation in the likelihood of a PCP reporting communication “Always or most of the time,” and there were only a handful of individual statistically significant associations, which were small (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Association Between Characteristics of Beneficiaries, Primary Care Physicians, and Primary Practice Sites With the PCP Sending or Receiving Information Always or Most of the Time to Specialists, Using Logistic Regression Models

DISCUSSION

Gaps in communication between PCPs and specialists persist. Because physicians participating in the CPC+ survey are a highly motivated subset and are in practices with relatively more sophisticated EHR use,6 actual communication behaviors nationwide are likely worse than what we found in the present research sample. Because these are physician-level proportions, the number of patients who are potentially affected is large. Further, the presence of any communication between providers does not guarantee that practitioners are sending or receiving the optimal information needed for clinical decision making.

Although our sample is not directly comparable to the national sample of primary care practices examined 11 years ago,1 the similarity in survey responses suggests that physicians still do not always intentionally engage in communication regarding referrals and consultations despite clinical information being more available. Our findings underscore the need for granular measurements of how communication is changing. It is not enough to assume that putting EHRs in place will improve communication; changes in communication need to be measured. More research is also needed to understand barriers to communication between PCPs and specialists, despite the availability of technology to aid communication and despite incentives to improve care coordination.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tyler Rose and Sandi Nelson for excellent programming. We thank Drs Deborah Peikes and Nancy McCall (of Mathematica) and Mr Timothy J. Day (of CMS) for thoughtful input and Jennifer Brown and Sharon Clark (of Mathematica) for their work in editing and producing this article.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • Read or post commentaries in response to this article.

  • Funding support: Funded by the US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, under contracts HHSM-500-2014-00034I/HHSM-500-T0010 and HHSM-500-2014-00034I/75FCMC19F0005.

  • Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policy or views of the US Department of Health and Human Services or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

  • Received for publication June 24, 2021.
  • Revision received September 15, 2021.
  • Accepted for publication September 28, 2021.
  • © 2022 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. O’Malley AS,
    2. Reschovsky JD.
    Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(1): 56-65. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.480
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Epstein RM.
    Communication between primary care physicians and consultants. Arch Fam Med. 1995; 4(5): 403-409. doi:10.1001/archfami.4.5.403
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Vermeir P,
    2. Vandijck D,
    3. Degroote S, et al.
    Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations. Int J Clin Pract. 2015; 69(11): 1257-1267. doi:10.1111/ijcp.12686
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Peikes D,
    2. Swankoski K,
    3. O’Malley A, et al.
    Independent evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): third annual report. Mathematica; 2021. Published Jan 2021. Accessed Feb 23, 2021. https://innovation.cms.gov/data-and-reports/2021/cpc-plus-third-anual-eval-report
  5. 5.↵
    1. Orzol S,
    2. Ghosh A,
    3. Fu N, et al.
    Independent evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): appendices to the third annual report. Mathematica; 2021. Published Jan 2021. Accessed Jan 13, 2022. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/appendices-independent-evaluation-of-comprehensive-primary-care-plus-cpc-third-annual-report
  6. 6.↵
    1. Singh P,
    2. Orzol S,
    3. Peikes D,
    4. Oh EG,
    5. Dale S.
    Participation in the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus initiative. Ann Fam Med. 2020; 18(4): 309-317. doi:10.1370/afm.2544
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (4)
Vol. 20, Issue 4
July/August 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • PLAIN LANGUAGE ARTICLE SUMMARIES
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Communication Gaps Persist Between Primary Care and Specialist Physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Communication Gaps Persist Between Primary Care and Specialist Physicians
Lori Timmins, Lisa M. Kern, Ann S. O’Malley, Carol Urato, Arkadipta Ghosh, Eugene Rich
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2022, 20 (4) 343-347; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2781

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Communication Gaps Persist Between Primary Care and Specialist Physicians
Lori Timmins, Lisa M. Kern, Ann S. O’Malley, Carol Urato, Arkadipta Ghosh, Eugene Rich
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2022, 20 (4) 343-347; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2781
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Perception of primary care services among the Afroperuvian population
  • Uplifting Primary Care Through the Electronic Health Record
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Genital Tucking Practices in Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients
  • Update to Gabapentinoid Use in the United States, 2002-2021
  • Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
Show more Research Brief

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • physician communication
  • primary and specialty care
  • referral and consultation communication

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine