Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Briefs

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Assessing Tobacco Status in Community Health Centers

Susan A. Flocke, Nathalie Huguet, Steffani R. Bailey, Tahlia Hodes and Jean P. O’Malley
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2023, 21 (2) 161-164; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2948
Susan A. Flocke
1Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: flocke@ohsu.edu
Nathalie Huguet
1Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steffani R. Bailey
1Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tahlia Hodes
1Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean P. O’Malley
2OCHIN Inc, Portland, Oregon
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Few have studied the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on tobacco use status assessment and cessation counseling. Electronic health record data from 217 primary care clinics were examined from January 1, 2019 to July 31, 2021. Data included telehealth and in-person visits for 759,138 adult patients (aged ≥18 years). Monthly rates of tobacco assessment per 1,000 patients were calculated. From March 2020 to May 2020, tobacco assessment monthly rates declined by 50% and increased from June 2020 to May 2021 but remained 33.5% lower than pre-pandemic levels. Rates of tobacco cessation assistance changed less, but remain low. These findings are significant given the relevance of tobacco use to increased severity of COVID-19.

Key words:
  • community health center
  • COVID-19
  • primary care
  • smoking status assessment
  • tobacco

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered patterns of primary health care–seeking and delivery. This was reflected in a dramatic increase in telehealth visits (ie, video and telephone visits)1,2 and a shift from comprehensive to acute care and immunization efforts. Many patients delayed seeking care for routine prevention and disease management due to limited in-person appointments and fear of traveling to/attending in-person visits. Since the start of the pandemic, several studies have shown a decline in receipt of preventive care3-6 and chronic disease management.7 Little is known about the impact of the pandemic on addressing tobacco use. Given the relevance of tobacco use for severe symptoms of COVID-19,8,9 it is important to understand the pandemic’s impact on tobacco assessment and cessation assistance.

Use of tobacco remains the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in the United States10 and disproportionately affects socioeconomically disadvantaged persons.11,12 Thus, reducing the harms from tobacco use is particularly important in the context of community health centers (CHCs) which provide primary care services for a large proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. The purpose of this study is to describe the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on the assessment of and cessation assistance for tobacco use among patients receiving care at CHCs.

METHODS

Electronic health record (EHR) data from CHCs from the OCHIN Network were extracted from January 1, 2019 to July 31, 2021. OCHIN, Inc is a nonprofit health technology network that provides a single instance of Epic to its member CHCs, which vary in size, location, staff roles, clinical workflows, and patient populations. OCHIN patients are socioeconomically vulnerable (>70% from households <200% of the federal poverty level). Eligible clinics were primary care or public health departments that provided patient care during the study period. A total of 217 clinics within 79 health centers across 13 states, representing 7,225,354 encounters by 759,138 patients, had useable tobacco-related data during the study period. Tobacco assessment and counseling were documented in the EHR with checkboxes indicating complete/not complete. Data were collected from telehealth and in-person primary care visits for adult patients (aged ≥18 years). Patients were included if they had ≥1 preventive care visit or ≥2 office or telehealth visits with a clinician between February 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021. Monthly rates of tobacco assessment per 1,000 patients were calculated. Rates of provision of tobacco cessation counseling and cessation medications (nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, and varenicline) per 1,000 patients that use tobacco were calculated. Telehealth visits were health care visits conducted by telephone or video. Rates of these indicators are reported by month for the study period and graphically displayed. The Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Institutional Review Board approved this study.

RESULTS

Figure 1 shows that from January 2019 to February 2020, monthly rates of tobacco assessment per 1,000 patients was 155.7. From March 2020 to May 2020, rates of tobacco assessment declined to 77.7 per 1,000 patients, a 50% reduction. From June 2020 to May 2021, rates of tobacco assessment increased but remained 33.5% lower than pre-pandemic levels.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Tobacco screening, counseling, and provision of tobacco cessation medications.

Provision of tobacco cessation counseling decreased from 109.5 from January 2019 to February 2020, to 87.1 per 1,000 tobacco users from March 2020 to May 2020, a 20.4% decline. From June 2020 to May 2021, rates of tobacco cessation counseling increased to 107.9 (2.5% lower than prepandemic levels). Provision of tobacco cessation medications was low, 43.9 per 1,000 tobacco users from January 2019 to February 2020, and declined slightly across the time periods.

Among the 217 clinics, the average monthly number of adult patients seen was 830. Figure 2 shows that the average monthly visit across clinics remained fairly steady; however, telehealth visits increased from a monthly average of 4.6 visits before the onset of the pandemic to 436.0 average monthly visits. The proportion of visits conducted as a telehealth visit peaked at 69.5% in April 2020 and declined gradually to 27% in June 2021.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Number of visits by month and percent of telehealth visits.

DISCUSSION

The decline in rate of tobacco assessment during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was substantial and rates did not return to prepandemic levels. These findings are significant given the relevance of smoking to increased severity of COVID-19 and the emerging evidence that tobacco cessation13 and abstinence rates have declined during this pandemic period.14 Further, the observed pattern of tobacco care delivery in CHCs is different from screening for colon, cervical, and breast cancer—which declined at the beginning of the pandemic but rebounded to prepandemic levels.4,5 Unlike other cancer screenings, tobacco assessment and cessation assistance do not require face-to-face interaction with health providers and can be conducted during telehealth visits. So why did tobacco assessment and assistance drop and not rebound to prepandemic levels?

It is possible that routines for tobacco assessment were disrupted with the change to telehealth and never reestablished as clinics shifted back to office visits. Tobacco assessment before the pandemic was likely conducted by medical assistants during the rooming process involving vital signs and tobacco use history.15 It is likely that telehealth visits changed this workflow such that gathering vital signs—typically done by the person who “roomed the patient”—was omitted as a step before initiating the interaction between the patient and clinician. Use of telehealth to collect information about tobacco history and provide tobacco treatment can be effective16,17; however, lack of standard workflow on when and who should assess tobacco history during telehealth visits in CHCs could have impeded tobacco assessment performance. Tobacco cessation assistance (counseling and medications) substantially outperforms other preventive services like cervical and breast cancer screening and provision of statins in the number needed to treat to prevent 1 death.18,19 Given the health impact of tobacco use, all primary care settings should have a process in place to routinely assess tobacco status and to provide assistance for quitting. Careful examination of procedural changes that promote or impede assessment of tobacco, including adaptation to support tobacco assessment via telehealth, is needed to guide resilient procedures that can weather operational changes.

Limitations

The data for this study are aggregate rates and cannot examine rates of tobacco assessment and assistance by telehealth visits vs office visits. Understanding this association is important to uncover operational issues to tobacco cessation support that could be addressed. Further, we cannot examine patient level characteristics to evaluate if the decline in tobacco cessation support affected some subgroups more than others. Finally, these data are from CHCs in 13 states and may not be generalizable to other settings.

CONCLUSIONS

The decline in rate of tobacco assessment during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was substantial and rates have not returned to pre-pandemic levels. Careful examination of procedural changes to adapt to various media of care delivery is needed to support CHCs preventive care delivery efforts and their patients.

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted with the Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health CenterNetwork (ADVANCE) Clinical Research Network (CRN). ADVANCE is led by OCHIN in partnership with Health Choice Network, Fenway Health, Oregon Health & Science University, and the Robert Graham Center HealthLandscape. ADVANCE is funded through the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), contract number RI-OCHIN-01-MC.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • Read or post commentaries in response to this article.

  • Funding support: This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (grant number P50CA244289). This P50 program was launched by NCI as part of the Cancer Moonshot. The funding source had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

  • Received for publication July 26, 2022.
  • Revision received October 20, 2022.
  • Accepted for publication November 2, 2022.
  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alexander GC,
    2. Tajanlangit M,
    3. Heyward J,
    4. Mansour O,
    5. Qato DM,
    6. Stafford RS.
    Use and content of primary care office-based vs telemedicine care visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(10): e2021476. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21476
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mehrotra A,
    2. Chernew M,
    3. Linetsky D,
    4. Hatch H,
    5. Cutler D,
    6. Schneider E.
    the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient care: visits return to prepandemic levels, but not for all providers and patients. The Commonwealth Fund. Published May 19, 2020. Accessed Jul 21, 2022. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/2020/apr/impact-covid-19-outpatient-visits
  3. 3.↵
    1. DeGroff A,
    2. Miller J,
    3. Sharma K, et al.
    COVID-19 impact on screening test volume through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer early detection program, January-June 2020, in the United States. Prev Med. 2021; 151: 106559. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106559
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fedewa SA,
    2. Star J,
    3. Bandi P, et al.
    Changes in cancer screening in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(6): e2215490. doi:10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2022.15490
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fisher-Borne M,
    2. Isher-Witt J,
    3. Comstock S,
    4. Perkins RB.
    Understanding COVID-19 impact on cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening among federally qualified healthcare centers participating in “Back on track with screening” quality improvement projects. Prev Med. 2021; 151: 106681. doi:10.1016/J.YPMED.2021.106681
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Huguet N,
    2. Hodes T,
    3. Holderness H,
    4. Bailey SR,
    5. DeVoe JE,
    6. Marino M.
    Community health centers’ performance in cancer screening and prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2022; 62(2): e97-e106. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.07.007
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kim E,
    2. Kojima N,
    3. Vangala S, et al.
    Impact of COVID-19 on primary care quality measures in an academic integrated health system. J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 37(5): 1161-1168. doi:10.1007/S11606-021-07193-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Vardavas CI,
    2. Nikitara K.
    COVID-19 and smoking: a systematic review of the evidence. Tob Induc Dis. 2020; 18(March): 20. doi:10.18332/tid/119324
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Grundy EJ,
    2. Suddek T,
    3. Filippidis FT,
    4. Majeed A,
    5. Coronini-Cronberg S.
    Smoking, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a review of reviews considering implications for public health policy and practice. 2020. doi:10.18332/tid/124788
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. U S Department of Health and Human Services
    . The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Jamal A,
    2. King BA,
    3. Neff LJ,
    4. Whitmill J,
    5. Babb SD,
    6. Graffunder CM.
    Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2005-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016; 65(44): 1205-1211. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hiscock R,
    2. Bauld L,
    3. Amos A,
    4. Fidler JA,
    5. Munafò M.
    Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012; 1248: 107-123. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Veldhuizen S,
    2. Selby P,
    3. Wong B,
    4. Zawertailo L.
    Effect of COVID-19 on smoking cessation outcomes in a large primary care treatment programme: an observational study. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(8): e053075. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053075
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Nagawa CS,
    2. Ito Fukunaga M,
    3. Faro JM, et al.
    Characterizing pandemic-related changes in smoking over time in a cohort of current and former smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; (February): ntac033. doi:10.1093/NTR/NTAC033
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gibson B,
    2. Kramer H,
    3. Weir C, et al.
    Workflow analysis for design of an electronic health record-based tobacco cessation intervention in community health centers. JAMIA Open. 2021; 4(3): ooaa070. doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa070
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kotsen C,
    2. Dilip D,
    3. Carter-Harris L, et al.
    Rapid scaling up of telehealth treatment for tobacco-dependent cancer patients during the COVID-19 outbreak in New York City. Telemed e-Health. 2021; 27(1): 20-29. doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0194
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rigotti NA,
    2. Taylor KL,
    3. Beneventi D, et al; Cancer Center Cessation Initiative Telehealth Working Group
    . Telehealth delivery of tobacco cessation treatment in cancer care: an ongoing innovation accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19(Suppl_1): S21-S24. doi:10.6004/JNCCN.2021.7092
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Pipe AL,
    2. Evans W,
    3. Papadakis S.
    Smoking cessation: health system challenges and opportunities. Tob Control. 2022; 31(2): 340-347. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056575
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. National Association of Community Health Centers
    . Health centers responding to COVID-19: 1 year review. Published Apr 2, 2021. Accessed July 21, 2022. https://www.nachc.org/research-and-data/health-centers-responding-to-covid-19-1-year-review/
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (2)
Vol. 21, Issue 2
March/April 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Article Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Assessing Tobacco Status in Community Health Centers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Assessing Tobacco Status in Community Health Centers
Susan A. Flocke, Nathalie Huguet, Steffani R. Bailey, Tahlia Hodes, Jean P. O’Malley
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2023, 21 (2) 161-164; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2948

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Assessing Tobacco Status in Community Health Centers
Susan A. Flocke, Nathalie Huguet, Steffani R. Bailey, Tahlia Hodes, Jean P. O’Malley
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2023, 21 (2) 161-164; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2948
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Changes in the Ambulatory Use of Antibiotics in France Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020-2022: A Nationwide Time-Series Analysis
  • Heplisav-B vs Standard Hepatitis B Vaccine Booster for Health Care Workers
  • The General Public Vastly Overestimates Primary Care Spending in the United States
Show more Research Briefs

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Other topics:
    • COVID-19

Keywords

  • community health center
  • COVID-19
  • primary care
  • smoking status assessment
  • tobacco

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine