Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Brief

Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs

Sarah Wulf, Kavita Vinekar, Christine Dehlendorf, Silpa Srinivasulu, Jody Steinauer and Diana N. Carvajal
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2023, 21 (6) 545-548; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3042
Sarah Wulf
1Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarah.wulf@ucsf.edu
Kavita Vinekar
2Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Dehlendorf
1Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
MD, MAS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silpa Srinivasulu
3Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, New York
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jody Steinauer
4Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diana N. Carvajal
5Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
    Karly P Preston, Carlie L Cohen and Megan T Lynch
    Published on: 29 February 2024
  • Published on: (29 February 2024)
    Page navigation anchor for RE: Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
    RE: Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
    • Karly P Preston, Undergraduate Student, The Ohio State University
    • Other Contributors:
      • Carlie L Cohen, Undergraduate student
      • Megan T Lynch, Undergraduate Student

    As aspiring healthcare providers and administrators, the long-term implications of overturning Roe versus Wade on comprehensive reproductive healthcare access and clinical training are of interest. A few key points in this piece prompted further consideration. First, with nearly one-third of family medicine residency programs located in abortion-restrictive states, this calls into question the breadth and depth of those residents’ training on reproductive healthcare. Additionally, lack of consistency in abortion training across family medicine residency programs can potentially worsen existing gaps in access for early pregnancy loss care and pregnancy options counseling. We are left to wonder how differences in reproductive healthcare training across residency programs have manifested in terms of health outcomes in both abortion-protective and abortion-restrictive states. Perhaps additional abortion treatment and reproductive healthcare training in medical school, prior to family medicine residency, could help to bridge training gaps given the current legal environment.

    Secondly, we are curious as to how the overturning of Roe versus Wade has impacted applications and admissions to family medicine residency programs across the United States. While OB/GYN residency programs in states with abortion bans have seen a stark decrease in applications, has there been a similar trend for family medicine residency programs located in abortion-restrictive states? On a similar...

    Show More

    As aspiring healthcare providers and administrators, the long-term implications of overturning Roe versus Wade on comprehensive reproductive healthcare access and clinical training are of interest. A few key points in this piece prompted further consideration. First, with nearly one-third of family medicine residency programs located in abortion-restrictive states, this calls into question the breadth and depth of those residents’ training on reproductive healthcare. Additionally, lack of consistency in abortion training across family medicine residency programs can potentially worsen existing gaps in access for early pregnancy loss care and pregnancy options counseling. We are left to wonder how differences in reproductive healthcare training across residency programs have manifested in terms of health outcomes in both abortion-protective and abortion-restrictive states. Perhaps additional abortion treatment and reproductive healthcare training in medical school, prior to family medicine residency, could help to bridge training gaps given the current legal environment.

    Secondly, we are curious as to how the overturning of Roe versus Wade has impacted applications and admissions to family medicine residency programs across the United States. While OB/GYN residency programs in states with abortion bans have seen a stark decrease in applications, has there been a similar trend for family medicine residency programs located in abortion-restrictive states? On a similar note, has the specialization of family medicine become less popular as a result of the overturning of Roe versus Wade? Given the shortages of primary care physicians in the United States, we are curious to know how this legislation could potentially impact the number of family medicine physicians going forward. This study prompts the need for further research on the long-term effects of the Roe versus Wade decision, both in terms of patient outcomes and quality of primary care physician reproductive healthcare training.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (6)
Vol. 21, Issue 6
November/December 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Plain Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
Sarah Wulf, Kavita Vinekar, Christine Dehlendorf, Silpa Srinivasulu, Jody Steinauer, Diana N. Carvajal
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 21 (6) 545-548; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3042

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
Sarah Wulf, Kavita Vinekar, Christine Dehlendorf, Silpa Srinivasulu, Jody Steinauer, Diana N. Carvajal
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 21 (6) 545-548; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3042
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Genital Tucking Practices in Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients
  • Update to Gabapentinoid Use in the United States, 2002-2021
Show more Research Brief

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Women's health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Comprehensiveness
  • Other topics:
    • Education

Keywords

  • abortion
  • family medicine
  • residency

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine