Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
DiscussionSpecial Report

Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care—the CRISP Statement

William R. Phillips, Elizabeth Sturgiss, Paul Glasziou, Tim C. olde Hartman, Aaron M. Orkin, Pallavi Prathivadi, Joanne Reeve, Grant M. Russell and Chris van Weel
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2023, 21 (6) 549-555; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3029
William R. Phillips
1University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wphllps@uw.edu
Elizabeth Sturgiss
2School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
BMed, FRACGP, MPH, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Glasziou
3Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
MBBS, FRACGP, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim C. olde Hartman
4Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron M. Orkin
5University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
MD, MSc, MPH, CCFP(EM), FRCPC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pallavi Prathivadi
6Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
MBBS, BMedSc (Hons), MMed (Pain Mgt), DCH, FRACGP, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne Reeve
7University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
BClinSci, MBChB, MPH, PhD, FRCGP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grant M. Russell
6Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
MBBS, MFM, FRACGP, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris van Weel
4Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
MD, PhD, FRCGP (Hon), FRACGP (Hon)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care reporting item Checklist and Instructions.

    CRISP = Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care; D = discussion; I = introduction; M = methods; N = no; NA = not applicable, R = results; Y = yes.

    Instructions: (1) The CRISP Checklist aids researchers in meeting readers’ needs by including content that our primary care research community feels is important for the validity, quality, and usefulness of primary care research reports. Authors and editors make final decisions. (2) Primary care research involves a wide variety of methods, study designs, topics, and settings; thus, not all items apply to all studies. Please respond to each item but note if it is not applicable for your study. If an item is missing from your report but applies to your study, simply note that and provide some brief explanation of why it is not included. (3) Authors should also use other reporting guidelines appropriate for their study and report. Some CRISP items may overlap with other guidelines. Version 1.0, published: October 4, 2023, CRISP (https://crisp-pc.org/).

    a For more information plus explanation, and examples of each item, see the Supplemental Appendix.

    b Indicate whether the item is included in your report: yes, no, or not applicable. If the item applies to the study design but is not included in the report, please provide an explanation.

    c Suggested location for the item in research reports according to the IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) format.

    d Notes on the location of the item in your report (by line, page, or section) or reason for omission of the item from the report.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Target Audience for CRISP Guidelines

    The target audience for the CRISP guidelines is everyone engaged in PC research, including at least 3 groups:
    Researchers working in PC clinical and scientific fields who identify themselves as PC researchers and intend their work to apply to PC settings or to apply their PC perspectives to other investigations
    Researchers working in PC settings, studying PC patients, problems, or processes
    Investigators who intend their work to be applied in PC or to influence PC clinicians and the care they provide
    • CRISP = Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care; PC = primary care.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    CRISP Studies on the Reporting of Primary Care Research That Nominated Potential Reporting Items

    Study and Year(s)DescriptionData SourceMethods
    Phillips et al,14 2000-2020Literature scoping review25 Publications extracted from 2,847 identifiedSystematic search of 7 databases and search engines
    Phillips et al,15 2018-2019Survey of PC research community255 Respondents, 24 nationsOnline survey of PC researchers and users across nation, profession, research role; snowball sample
    Phillips et al,16 2019Survey of PC practitioners252 Respondents, 29 nations; PC clinicians who provide direct patient care during more than 50% of the work weekOnline survey of PC practitioners across nation, profession, research experience; snowball sample
    Phillips et al,14 2020Scan of reporting guidelines14 PC-relevant guidelines listed in EQUATOR NetworkScan of reporting guideline content compared with findings of PC researcher survey
    Unpublished study,a 2020Survey of PC journal editors12 Editors of major journals that publish PC researchE-mail survey and telephone interviews
    Sturgiss et al17 and Phillips et al,18 2021CRISP Delphi study89 PC participants across world regions, professions, research roles, and experienceOnline, closed, confidential Delphi study, 2 rounds
    • CRISP = Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care; EQUATOR = Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research; PC = primary care.

    • ↵a Journal editor recommendations for better reporting of PC research (unpublished data, Phillips et al, 2020).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • Phillips-Supp-App-Table-2023.pdf -

      PDF file

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (6)
Vol. 21, Issue 6
November/December 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Plain Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care—the CRISP Statement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care—the CRISP Statement
William R. Phillips, Elizabeth Sturgiss, Paul Glasziou, Tim C. olde Hartman, Aaron M. Orkin, Pallavi Prathivadi, Joanne Reeve, Grant M. Russell, Chris van Weel
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 21 (6) 549-555; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3029

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care—the CRISP Statement
William R. Phillips, Elizabeth Sturgiss, Paul Glasziou, Tim C. olde Hartman, Aaron M. Orkin, Pallavi Prathivadi, Joanne Reeve, Grant M. Russell, Chris van Weel
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 21 (6) 549-555; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3029
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CRISP INITIATIVE
    • CRISP GUIDELINES
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • GPs perspectives on diagnostic testing in children with persistent non-specific symptoms: a qualitative study
  • Improving primary care research reporting: Introducing the Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care checklist
  • Ameliorer les rapports de recherche en soins primaires: Presentation de la Liste de verification des elements de rapport detudes en soins primaires etablis par consensus
  • Commentary on the CRISP Statement
  • A Milestone for Promoting Research in Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • AHRQ’s National Center for Excellence in Primary Care Research (NCEPCR): A New Home for Primary Care Research
  • Affirmative Action—A Crack in the Door to Higher Education
  • For AI in Primary Care, Start With the Problem
Show more Special Report

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Other topics:
    • Research capacity building

Keywords

  • guidelines
  • research report
  • checklist
  • primary care
  • research
  • consensus
  • stakeholder participation
  • Delphi studies
  • research impact
  • research design
  • surveys and questionnaires
  • authors
  • editors
  • reviewers
  • article
  • publishing
  • journals

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine