Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportEducation and training

Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice

Kento Sonoda, Zachary Morgan and Lars Peterson
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3447; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.21.s1.3447
Kento Sonoda
MD, AAHIVS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachary Morgan
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Peterson
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted both the healthcare system and medical education. In response to the pandemic, family medicine residency (FMR) programs had to adjust their training curriculum. This is the first national survey to explore the intended scope of practice of graduating family medicine residents in the pandemic.

Objective: We aimed to investigate whether the pandemic affected the intended scope of practice of graduating family medicine residents.

Study Design and Analysis: Cross-sectional study.

Setting or Dataset: We used 2017 through 2021 data from the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Family Medicine Certification Examination Registration Questionnaire. The questionnaire is a required component of registration, which has a 100% response rate. The respondents are asked if they plan to provide a series of services and procedures after residency.

Population Studied: The examination is administered twice a year, spring and fall. The questionnaire is completed by graduating residents 3 to 4 months before the examination date. For example, 98% (3,983/4,066) of 2021 graduates completed the questionnaire prior to March 2021.

Intervention/Instrument: Nationwide survey for graduating family medicine residents.

Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was the intended scope of practice of graduating family medicine residents.

Results: 18,479 graduating residents were included in this study. Intended scope of practice in these services and procedures remained unchanged among 2021 graduating residents, compared with the pre-pandemic graduating residents from 2017 to 2020.

Conclusions: We did not detect a change in the intended scope of practice between pre-pandemic and pandemic period residency graduates despite the disruption of their medical education and higher burnout rates among family physicians. Our findings suggest that FMR flexibly adjusted their curriculum to ensure resident training on a variety of services and procedures in response to the pandemic. Our study includes the following limitations. Our survey did examine the intended scope of practice instead of actual provision of practice after residency, so it is still unknown how much the pandemic affects scope of practice after residency. It is possible that 2021 graduating residents already developed their competencies before the pandemic. To fully assess the pandemics’ impact on training, we need to track these trends with later cohorts, including 2022 and 2023 graduates.

  • © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 21, Issue Supplement 1
1 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice
Kento Sonoda, Zachary Morgan, Lars Peterson
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3447; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3447

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice
Kento Sonoda, Zachary Morgan, Lars Peterson
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2023, 21 (Supplement 1) 3447; DOI: 10.1370/afm.21.s1.3447
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Impact of Structured Sleep Medicine Lecture Series in Family Medicine Residents
  • Improving Scholarship in a Community Hospital Residency Program with a Curriculum featuring a Structured Roadmap, Indi
  • The Midwest Trans Health Education Network: Increasing Access to Gender Affirming Care Through Virtual Training Cohorts
Show more Education and training

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine