Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

More Tethered to the EHR: EHR Workload Trends Among Academic Primary Care Physicians, 2019-2023

Brian G. Arndt, Mark A. Micek, Adam Rule, Christina M. Shafer, Jeffrey J. Baltus and Christine A. Sinsky
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2024, 22 (1) 12-18; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3047
Brian G. Arndt
1Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: brian.arndt@fammed.wisc.edu
Mark A. Micek
2Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Rule
3Information School, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina M. Shafer
2Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
4Independent consultant, Madison, Wisconsin
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey J. Baltus
5University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine A. Sinsky
6Professional Satisfaction and Practice Sustainability, American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Primary care physicians’ average workload by year.

    aFTE = ambulatory FTE; FTE = full-time equivalency.

    Note: Grey band represents 95% confidence interval.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Primary care physicians’ average time in the EHR by year.

    EHR = electronic health record; TOSH = time outside scheduled hours on days with scheduled appointments; TUSD = time on unscheduled days.

    Note: Time in notes, inbox, orders, clinical review, outside scheduled hours on days with appointments, and on unscheduled days are included in total EHR time. Grey band represents 95% confidence interval.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Primary care physicians’ average volume of select inbox message types received by year.

    eConsult = electronic consult.

    Note: Grey band represents 95% confidence interval.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Physician Demographics and Workload by Specialty

    CharacteristicAll Specialties
    (N = 141)
    Family Medicine
    (N = 70)
    Internal Medicine
    (N = 48)
    General Pediatrics
    (n = 23)
    P Value
    Sex, No. (%)
        Male47 (33.3)26 (37.1)17 (35.4)4 (17.4)0.20a
        Female94 (66.7)44 (62.9)31 (64.6)19 (82.6)
    Employment, y, No. (%)
        <59 (64.9)6 (8.6)3 (6.2)0 (0.00)0.64a
        5-933 (23.4)16 (22.9)11 (22.9)6 (26.1)
        10-1445 (31.9)25 (35.7)15 (31.2)5 (21.7)
        15-1915 (10.6)7 (10.0)6 (12.5)2 (8.7)
        ≥2039 (27.7)16 (22.9)13 (27.1)10 (43.5)
    Workload, mean (SD)b
        Ambulatory FTE        0.63 (0.21)        0.61 (0.20)        0.65 (0.23)        0.62 (0.18)0.36c
        Active panel size/ambulatory FTE2,117.0 (482.0)2,244.0 (541.0)1,966.0 (359.0)2,043.0 (418.0)  0.002c
        Visits/week31.1 (9.9)31.4 (9.5)29.7 (10.7)33.0 (9.3)0.45c
        Visits/8-hour clinic15.1 (2.3)15.8 (2.2)13.7 (1.4)16.0 (2.8)<.001c
        Hours/week16.7 (5.3)16.3 (5.1)17.3 (6.0)16.9 (4.6)0.42c
    • FTE = full-time equivalent.

    • ↵a P value from χ2 test.

    • ↵b Workload data averaged from April 2022 to March 2023.

    • ↵c P value from Kruskal-Wallis H-test.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    EHR Time and Inbox Message Volume by Study Year

    2019-2020
    Mean (SD)a
    2020-2021
    Mean (SD)b
    2021-2022
    Mean (SD)c
    2022-2023
    Mean (SD)d
    Change, 2019-2020 to 2020-2021Change, 2020-2021 to 2021-2022Change, 2021-2022 to 2022-2023Change, 2019-2020 to 2022-2023
    Obs (%)Est (95% CI)P ValueeObs (%)Est (95% CI)P ValueeObs (%)Est (95% CI)P ValueeObs (%)Est (95% CI)P Valuee
    Workload
        Ambulatory aFTE0.66 (0.21)0.65 (0.22)0.64 (0.22)0.63 (0.21)−0.01(−1.8)−0.01 (−0.01 to −0.01)<.001−0.01(−2.0)−0.01 (−0.02 to −0.01)<.001−0.01(−1.4)−0.01 (−0.01 to −0.01)<.001−0.03 (−5.2)−0.03 (−0.04 to −0.03)<.001
        Active panel/aFTE2,153.0 (529)2,202.0 (618)2,203.0 (614)2,117.0 (482)49.0 (2.3)49.0 (25.0 to 73.0)<.0011 (0.0)2 (−21.0 to 26.0)0.87−86 (−3.9)−92.0 (−116.0 to −69.0)<.001−36 (−1.7)−41.0 (−66.0 to −17.0)0.001
        Visits815.4 (2.9)13.1 (1.8)14.4 (2.2)15.1 (2.3)−2.2 (−14.5)−2.3 (−2.4 to −2.1)<.0011.3 (9.7)1.3 (1.2 to 1.5)<.0010.7 (4.7)0.7 (0.5 to 0.8)<.001−0.3 (−1.8)−0.3 (−0.4 to −0.1)<.001
        VisitsWeek33.6 (11.2)28.7 (9.0)30.6 (9.8)31.1 (9.9)−4.9 (−14.6)−5.0 (−5.5 to −4.5)<.0011.9 (6.5)1.8 (1.3 to 2.3)<.0010.5 (1.7)0.6 (0.1 to 1.1)0.01−2.5 (−7.5)−2.6 (−3.1 to −2.1)<.001
        HoursWeek17.7 (5.4)17.8 (5.5)17.2 (5.5)16.7 (5.3)0.0 (0.2)0.1 (−0.2 to 0.3)0.65−0.5 (−2.9)−0.6 (−0.8 to −0.4)<.001−0.5 (−2.9)−0.4 (−0.7 to −0.2)<.001−1.0 (−5.5)−1.0 (−1.2 to −0.7)<.001
    EHR time, min per 8 hours scheduled clinic
        EHR8362.9 (132.9)366.1 (145.8)383.6 (150.0)391.3 (149.1)3.2 (0.9)2.2 (−2.3 to 6.7)0.3617.5 (4.8)17.9 (13.5 to 22.2)<.0017.7 (2.0)7.9 (3.5 to 12.3)0.00128.4 (7.8)28.0 (23.5 to 32.5)<.001
        Notes8124.6 (73.4)122.0 (79.1)129.0 (79.4)127.5 (78.5)−2.6 (−2.1)−2.9 (−5.1 to −0.8)0.0096.9 (5.7)7.2 (5.1 to 9.2)<.001−1.4 (−1.1)−1.2 (−3.3 to 0.9)0.282.9 (2.3)3.0 (0.8 to 5.1)0.008
        Inbox857.4 (24.9)67.1 (30.7)73.6 (34.4)71.4 (32.4)9.6 (16.8)8.9 (7.6 to 10.2)<.0016.6 (9.8)7.1 (5.8 to 8.3)<.001−2.2 (−3.0)−3.1 (−4.3 to −1.8)<.00114.0 (24.4)12.9 (11.6 to 14.2)<.001
        Orders839.2 (13.2)46.3 (19.6)57.6 (24.3)62.4 (25.2)7.1 (18.1)6.5 (5.6 to 7.3)<.00111.3 (24.4)11.6 (10.8 to 12.3)<.0014.7 (8.2)4.7 (3.9 to 5.4)<.00123.1 (58.9)22.7 (21.9 to 23.5)<.001
        Review855.4 (25.4)62.5 (30.3)63.5 (31.0)62.6 (30.2)7.1 (12.9)6.9 (5.9 to 7.8)<.0011.0 (1.5)1.0 (0.1 to 1.9)0.03−0.9 (−1.4)−1.0 (−1.9 to −0.1)0.037.2 (13.0)6.9 (5.9 to 7.8)<.001
        TOSH877.9 (54.7)77.2 (54.2)81.6 (58.2)84.3 (58.8)−0.8 (−1.0)−1.1 (−3.1 to 0.9)0.304.4 (5.7)4.5 (2.6 to 6.4)<.0012.7 (3.3)2.7 (0.8 to 4.6)0.0086.4 (8.2)6.1 (4.1 to 8.1)<.001
        TUSD868.2 (61.8)75.5 (75.7)80.5 (76.2)81.8 (77.2)7.3 (10.7)6.9 (3.9 to 9.9)<.0015.0 (6.6)5.2 (2.4 to 8.1)<.0011.3 (1.6)1.2 (−1.7 to 4.0)0.4613.6 (19.9)13.3 (10.3 to 16.3)<.001
    Inbox volume (messages)
        Patient calls26.2 (12.1)25.5 (11.1)24.9 (10.3)23.5 (9.6)−0.8 (−3.0)−0.6 (−1.1 to −0.1)0.01−0.6 (−2.3)−0.6 (−1.1 to −0.2)0.01−1.4 (−5.6)−1.3 (−1.8 to −0.9)<.001−2.8 (−10.5)−2.6 (−3.1 to −2.1)<.001
        Rx812.0 (7.8)13.7 (8.7)14.7 (9.7)14.3 (8.5)1.7 (14.4)1.7 (1.3 to 2.0)<.0011.0 (7.2)1.0 (0.7 to 1.4)<.001−0.4 (−2.6)−0.5 (−0.8 to −0.1)0.0062.3 (19.5)2.2 (1.9 to 2.6)<.001
        Results812.6 (6.1)11.0 (5.2)12.2 (5.3)12.3 (5.1)−1.6 (−12.5)−1.6 (−1.8 to −1.4)<.0011.2 (10.5)1.2 (1.0 to 1.4)<.0010.1 (0.6)0.0 (−0.2 to 0.3)0.72−0.3 (−2.7)−0.4 (−0.6 to −0.2)0.001
        MyChart89.8 (5.9)14.4 (7.8)15.1 (7.9)15.3 (7.6)4.6 (47.2)4.5 (4.2 to 4.8)<.0010.7 (4.7)0.7 (0.4 to 1.1)<.0010.1 (0.9)0.0 (−0.3 to 0.3)0.885.4 (55.5)5.3 (5.0 to 5.6)<.001
        eConsult80.19 (0.2)0.24 (0.25)0.27 (0.3)0.31 (0.3)0.04 (23.0)0.04 (0.02 to 0.06)<.0010.03 (13.9)0.04 (0.02 to 0.05)<.0010.04 (14.9)0.03 (0.02 to 0.05)<.0010.12 (61.0)0.11 (0.09 to 0.12)<.001
    • 8 = per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments; aFTE = ambulatory FTE; eConsult = electronic consult; EHR = electronic health record; Est = model estimate; FTE = full-time equivalency;

    • Obs = observed; Rx = medical prescription; TOSH = time outside scheduled hours on days with scheduled appointments; TUSD = time on unscheduled days.

    • ↵a May 2019 to February 2020.

    • ↵b June 2020 to March 2021.

    • ↵c May 2021 to March 2022.

    • ↵d April 2022 to March 2023.

    • ↵e P values adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to limit false discovery rate to 5%.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • Arndt-Supp-T1.pdf -

      PDF file

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (1)
Vol. 22, Issue 1
January/February 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
More Tethered to the EHR: EHR Workload Trends Among Academic Primary Care Physicians, 2019-2023
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
20 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
More Tethered to the EHR: EHR Workload Trends Among Academic Primary Care Physicians, 2019-2023
Brian G. Arndt, Mark A. Micek, Adam Rule, Christina M. Shafer, Jeffrey J. Baltus, Christine A. Sinsky
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2024, 22 (1) 12-18; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3047

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
More Tethered to the EHR: EHR Workload Trends Among Academic Primary Care Physicians, 2019-2023
Brian G. Arndt, Mark A. Micek, Adam Rule, Christina M. Shafer, Jeffrey J. Baltus, Christine A. Sinsky
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2024, 22 (1) 12-18; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3047
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Future-proofing family medicine
  • Assurer levolutivite de la medecine familiale
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
  • Adverse Outcomes Associated With Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Health informatics

Keywords

  • electronic health records (EHR)
  • workload
  • burnout
  • practice of primary care
  • patient portal

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine