Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Health Care Utilization After a Visit to a Within-Group Family Physician vs a Walk-In Clinic Physician

Christine Salahub, Peter C. Austin, Li Bai, Simon Berthelot, R. Sacha Bhatia, Cherryl Bird, Laura Desveaux, Tara Kiran, Aisha Lofters, Danielle Martin, Kerry McBrien, Rita K. McCracken, J. Michael Paterson, Bahram Rahman, Jennifer Shuldiner, Mina Tadrous, Niels Thakkar, Noah M. Ivers and Lauren Lapointe-Shaw
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2024, 22 (6) 483-491; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3181
Christine Salahub
1Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Salahub)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Austin
2ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Bai, Kiran, Paterson, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
3Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Desveaux, Kiran, Martin, Paterson, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
4Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Bai
2ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Bai, Kiran, Paterson, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Berthelot
5Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d’urgence, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada (Berthelot)
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Sacha Bhatia
6Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Bhatia, Lapointe-Shaw)
7Department of Cardiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Bhatia)
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cherryl Bird
8Patient Partner, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Bird)
HBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Desveaux
3Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Desveaux, Kiran, Martin, Paterson, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
9Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Desveaux, Shuldiner, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
10Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada (Desveaux)
PhD, MScPT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tara Kiran
2ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Bai, Kiran, Paterson, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
3Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Desveaux, Kiran, Martin, Paterson, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
11Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Kiran, Lofters, Martin, Ivers)
12MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Kiran);
13Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Kiran)
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aisha Lofters
11Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Kiran, Lofters, Martin, Ivers)
14Peter Gilgan Centre for Women’s Cancers, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Lofters)
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle Martin
3Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Desveaux, Kiran, Martin, Paterson, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
11Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Kiran, Lofters, Martin, Ivers)
15Department of Family Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Martin, Ivers)
MD, MPP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerry McBrien
16Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (McBrien)
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rita K. McCracken
17Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (McCracken)
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Michael Paterson
2ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Bai, Kiran, Paterson, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
3Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Desveaux, Kiran, Martin, Paterson, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bahram Rahman
18Primary Health Care Branch, Ministry of Health, Ontario, Canada (Rahman)
19Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada (Rahman)
MD, MPP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Shuldiner
9Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Desveaux, Shuldiner, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
MPH, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mina Tadrous
2ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Bai, Kiran, Paterson, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
9Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Desveaux, Shuldiner, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
20Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Tadrous);
PharmD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niels Thakkar
21College of Nurses of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Thakkar)
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noah M. Ivers
2ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Bai, Kiran, Paterson, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
3Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Desveaux, Kiran, Martin, Paterson, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
9Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Desveaux, Shuldiner, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
11Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Kiran, Lofters, Martin, Ivers)
15Department of Family Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Martin, Ivers)
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Lapointe-Shaw
2ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Bai, Kiran, Paterson, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
3Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Austin, Desveaux, Kiran, Martin, Paterson, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
6Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Bhatia, Lapointe-Shaw)
9Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Desveaux, Shuldiner, Tadrous, Ivers, Lapointe-Shaw)
22Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Lapointe-Shaw)
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lauren.lapointe.shaw@mail.utoronto.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Patients in Matched Cohort (April 1, 2019-March 31, 2020)

    CharacteristicPatients With a Visit to a Walk-in Clinic Physician They Were Not Enrolled With, at Any Time N = 506,033Patients With a Visit to a Within-Group Physician They Were Not Enrolled With, After Hours or on a Weekend N = 506,033Standardized Mean Difference
    Quarter of index encounter, No. (%)
        Q1 (Apr-Jun 2019)171,387 (33.9)168,119 (33.2)0.01
        Q2 (Jul-Sep 2019)127,581 (25.2)127,390 (25.2)0
        Q3 (Oct-Dec 2019)122,780 (24.3)125,126 (24.7)0.01
        Q4 (Jan-Mar 2020)84,285 (16.7)85,398 (16.9)0.01
    Age, y
        Mean (SD)39.3 (22.5)40.1 (22.3)0.04
        Median (IQR)39 (21-57)41 (22-57)NA
    Age, y, No. (%)
        ≤18107,547 (21.3)106,694 (21.1)0
        19-29  79,525 (15.7)  65,073 (12.9)0.08
        30-44103,886 (20.5)109,801 (21.7)0.03
        45-64139,851 (27.6)149,241 (29.5)0.04
        65-7443,762 (8.6)44,238 (8.7)0
        ≥7531,462 (6.2)30,986 (6.1)0
    Age category, y, No. (%)
        0-17100,534 (19.9)100,534 (19.9)0
        18-64330,275 (65.3)330,275 (65.3)0
        ≥65  75,224 (14.9)  75,224 (14.9)0
    Sex, No. (%)
        Female297,679 (58.8)301,383 (59.6)0.02
        Male208,354 (41.2)204,650 (40.4)0.02
    Neighborhood income quintile, No. (%)
        1 (Lowest)82,654 (16.3)83,936 (16.6)0.01
        296,531 (19.1)98,158 (19.4)0.01
        3106,162 (21.0)106,812 (21.1)0
        4111,666 (22.1)109,107 (21.6)0.01
        5 (Highest)109,020 (21.5)108,020 (21.3)0.01
    OHIP registrant within past 10 years, No. (%)40,719 (8.0)43,868 (8.7)0.02
    Rurality of residence, No. (%)
        Large urban422,668 (83.5)422,668 (83.5)0
        Small urban71,655 (14.2)71,655 (14.2)0
        Rural11,710 (2.3)11,710 (2.3)0
    Resource Utilization Band, No. (%)
        Low122,803 (24.3)116,880 (23.1)0.03
        Moderate275,502 (54.4)277,830 (54.9)0.01
        High107,728 (21.3)111,323 (22.0)0.02
    Count of own family physician visits in previous 2 years
        Mean (SD)4.9 (5.5)5.1 (5.7)0.04
        Median (IQR)3 (1-7)4 (1-7)NA
    Own family physician visits in previous 2 years, No. (%)
        <2146,993 (29.0)136,114 (26.9)0.05
        2-5197,212 (39.0)199,120 (39.3)0.01
        6-989,538 (17.7)94,555 (18.7)0.03
        ≥1072,290 (14.3)76,244 (15.1)0.02
    Emergency department visits in previous year
        Mean (SD)0.5 (1.3)0.5 (1.3)0.01
        Median (IQR)0 (0-1)0 (0-1)NA
    Patient enrollment model, No. (%)
        Capitation193,577 (38.3)197,858 (39.1)0.02
        Enhanced fee for service171,432 (33.9)164,943 (32.6)0.03
        Team based139,313 (27.5)142,079 (28.1)0.01
        Other group1,711 (0.3)1,153 (0.2)0.02
    Size of enrolling physician’s group, No. (%)
        Mean (SD)46.2 (78.6)45.0 (74.5)0.02
        Median (IQR)21 (11-42)21 (11-40)NA
        Weekend visit, No. (%)142,413 (28.1)172,618 (34.1)0.13
    Distance from patient’s residence to enrolling physician’s practice location, km
        Mean (SD)14.0 (35.7)11.3 (33.2)0.08
        Median (IQR)6 (3-13)5 (2-11)NA
        <2.8 km, No. (%)119,435 (23.6)133,581 (26.4)0.07
        2.8-6.4 km, No. (%)119,723 (23.7)133,294 (26.3)0.06
        6.5-14.8 km, No. (%)128,165 (25.3)124,853 (24.7)0.02
        ≥14.9 km, No. (%)138,710 (27.4)114,305 (22.6)0.11
    • IQR = interquartile range; NA = not applicable; OHIP = Ontario Health Insurance Plan.

    • Note. Not listed: Top 20 diagnoses (Supplemental Table 5).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Propensity Score–Matched Outcomes

    OutcomePatients With Visit to a Walk-In Clinic Physician They Were Not Enrolled With, at Any Time N = 506,033Patients With a Visit to a Within-Group Physician They Were Not Enrolled With, After Hours or on a Weekend N = 506,033Risk Difference, % (95% CI)Relative Risk, (95% CI)
    Emergency department visit within 7 days, No. (%)22,320 (4.4)20,117 (4.0)0.4 (0.4 to 0.5)0.90 (0.89 to 0.92)
    Time to emergency department visit (d), up to 30 days
    Mean (SD)7.8 (8.7)8.3 (8.8)NA0.94 (0.93 to 0.95)a
    Median (IQR)4 (0 to 14)4 (1 to 14)NANA
    Low-acuity emergency department visit within 7 days, No. (%)5,644 (1.1)5,323 (1.1)0.06 (0.02 to 0.1)0.94 (0.91 to 0.98)
    Emergency department visit within 30 days, No. (%)37,717 (7.5)35,584 (7.0)0.4 (0.3 to 0.5)0.94 (0.93 to 0.96)
    Virtual visit with any family physician within 7 days, No. (%)1,143 (0.2)1,047 (0.2)0.02 (0 to 0.04)0.92 (0.84 to 1.00)
    Virtual visit with patient’s own enrolling physician within 7 days, No. (%)293 (0.1)393 (0.1)0.02 (0.01 to 0.03)1.34 (1.15 to 1.56)
    Virtual visit with a physician within the patient’s own enrolling group within 7 days, No. (%)321 (0.1)598 (0.1)0.05 (0.04 to 0.07)1.86 (1.63 to 2.13)
    In-person visit with any family physician within 7 days, No. (%)66,878 (13.2)66,908 (13.2)0.01 (−0.1 to 0.1)1.00 (0.99 to 1.01)
    In-person visit with patient’s own enrolling physician within 7 days, No. (%)26,326 (5.2)35,860 (7.1)1.9 (1.8 to 2.0)1.36 (1.34 to 1.38)
    In-person visit with a physician within the patient’s own enrolling group within 7 days, No. (%)30,410 (6.0)56,704 (11.2)5.2 (5.1 to 5.3)1.87 (1.84 to 1.89)
    Count of all family physician visits (any) within 30 days
    Mean (SD)0.5 (0.9)0.5 (0.9)NA1.14 (1.14 to 1.16)
    Median (IQR)0 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 1)NANA
    • IQR = interquartile range; NA = not applicable.

    • ↵a Hazard ratio.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS IN PDF FILE BELOW

    Supplemental Table 1.  ICES Data Sources

    Supplemental Table 2. Definition of Visit Types

    Supplemental Table3. Operational Definitions of All Variables

    Supplemental Table 4. Characteristics of Patients in the Unmatched Cohort

    Supplemental Table 5. Top 20 Visit Diagnoses for Patients in the Matched Cohort

    Supplemental Table 6. Relative Risk of Having an ED Visit After an Encounter With a Within-Group Physician Compared to With a Walk-In Clinic Physician, Stratified by Age and Rurality

    Supplemental Table 7. Characteristics of Patients in the Unmatched Weekend-Only Cohort

    Supplemental Table 8. Characteristics of Patients in the Matched Weekend-Only Cohort

    Supplemental Table 9. Top 20 Diagnoses for Patients in the Weekend-Only Matched Cohort

    Supplemental Table 10. Propensity Score-Matched Outcomes for Visits on  a Weekend

    Supplemental Figure 1. Study Population Flowchart

    Supplemental Figure 2a. Kaplan-Meier Curve of Time to ED Visit for Patients Who Visited a Walk-In Physician They Were Not Enrolled to, Anytime (Blue Line) and Patients Who Visited a Within-Group MD They Were Not Enrolled to, During After Hours or on a Weekend (Red Line)

    Supplemental Figure 2b. Kaplan-Meier Curve of Time to ED Visit for Patients Who Visited a Walk-In Physician They Were Not Enrolled to on a Weekend (Blue Line) and Patients Who Visited a Within-Group MD They Were Not Enrolled to on a Weekend (Red Line)

    • LapointeSuppTables1-10SuppFigures1-2.pdf
  • VISUAL ABSTRACT IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • Lapointe-Shaw.pdf
  • PLAIN-LANGUAGE ARTICLE SUMMARY AND VISUAL ABSTRACT

    Original Research

    Within-Group Physician Visits Reduce Emergency Department Use Compared to Out-of-Group Walk-In Clinic Visits 

    Background and Goal: Timely access to primary care is essential, but many patients face difficulties booking same-day or next-day appointments with their regular family physician. Walk-in clinics offer a solution by providing care without an appointment, but they often disrupt continuity of care. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who visited a physician from their own family physician group during after-hours versus those who visited an out-of-group walk-in clinic physician.

    Study Approach: This retrospective study used claims data from Ontario, Canada to compare patients who visited a physician within their family physician group for after-hours care with those who visited out-of-group walk-in clinics. Researchers examined emergency department visits within seven days of these appointments and other outcomes like follow-up visits with their regular physician. Patients in each group were matched to ensure comparable characteristics for analysis.

    Main Results: The study identified 607,166 individuals who had their visit with a within-group physician during after-hours or on weekends, and 1,094,215 individuals who had their visit with an out-of-group walk-in clinic physician they were not enrolled to. After matching, there were 506,033 individuals in each group.

    • Patients who saw a within-group family physician after hours were 10% less likely to visit the emergency department within seven days compared to those who saw an out-of-group walk-in clinic physician.

    • This difference was most evident in patients living in large urban areas and among children and adolescents.

    • Those who saw a physician within their group were more likely to follow-up with their own family physician or another doctor from their group in the following week.

    Why It Matters:The findings suggest that maintaining continuity of care, even for after-hours visits, can reduce unnecessary emergency department visits. Ensuring patients can access timely care with a physician within their own family physician group may help improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs by decreasing emergency department usage.

    Health Care Utilization After a Visit to a Within-Group Family Physician vs a Walk- In Clinic Physician

    Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, MD, PhD, et al  

     Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Women's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Visual Abstract

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (6)
Vol. 22, Issue 6
November/December 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries of the Issue
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Health Care Utilization After a Visit to a Within-Group Family Physician vs a Walk-In Clinic Physician
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Health Care Utilization After a Visit to a Within-Group Family Physician vs a Walk-In Clinic Physician
Christine Salahub, Peter C. Austin, Li Bai, Simon Berthelot, R. Sacha Bhatia, Cherryl Bird, Laura Desveaux, Tara Kiran, Aisha Lofters, Danielle Martin, Kerry McBrien, Rita K. McCracken, J. Michael Paterson, Bahram Rahman, Jennifer Shuldiner, Mina Tadrous, Niels Thakkar, Noah M. Ivers, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (6) 483-491; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3181

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Health Care Utilization After a Visit to a Within-Group Family Physician vs a Walk-In Clinic Physician
Christine Salahub, Peter C. Austin, Li Bai, Simon Berthelot, R. Sacha Bhatia, Cherryl Bird, Laura Desveaux, Tara Kiran, Aisha Lofters, Danielle Martin, Kerry McBrien, Rita K. McCracken, J. Michael Paterson, Bahram Rahman, Jennifer Shuldiner, Mina Tadrous, Niels Thakkar, Noah M. Ivers, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (6) 483-491; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3181
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impact of changes in primary care attachment: a scoping review
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Continuity

Keywords

  • after hours
  • primary care
  • walk-in clinic
  • continuity of care
  • retail clinic
  • Canada

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine