Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportSystematic review, meta-analysis, or scoping review

Outcomes of Guidelines from Health Technology Assessment Organizations: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review

Ashkan Baradaran, Roland Grad, Isabelle Ganache, Samira Rahimi and Genevieve Gore
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6064; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.22.s1.6064
Ashkan Baradaran
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland Grad
MD, MSc, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabelle Ganache
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samira Rahimi
PhD, Eng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Genevieve Gore
MLIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) organizations determine the value of health technologies such as medical devices, lab tests, or medications. HTA organizations are generally funded by governments, they guide health care professionals and decision/policy-makers, and they publish knowledge translation products such as guidelines.

Objectives: To explore and measure the outcomes of HTA organizations’ guidelines in family medicine.

Study Design and Analysis: A systematic mixed studies review (including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies) was performed. Published literature in English and French was retrieved through searches of seven databases. A two-phase sequential data synthesis was performed. Phase-1: We conducted a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis, identified the types of outcomes, and displayed the relationships between these types on a concept map. Phase-2: We extracted descriptive statistics and tabulated them by type of outcome.

Setting: Community-based primary health care.

Population Studied: Family physicians, general practitioners, and patients.

Main outcome measures: Situational relevance, cognitive/affective impact (e.g., learning), the use of guideline-based information in clinical practice, and subsequent patient health outcomes. Health organization outcomes.

Results: A total of 6719 records were retrieved. After de-duplication, the selection process started with 4922 articles. The full-text screening started with 345 studies and resulted in 120 included observational studies (21 qualitative, 94 quantitative, and 5 mixed methods). Twenty-nine types of outcomes are qualitatively documented. Descriptive statistics (e.g., means, rates, ratios, p-values) and the direction of the outcome (i.e., positive, neutral, and negative impact) are presented for 17 types of outcomes. Considering the heterogeneity of evidence, a meta-analysis was not feasible. We built a concept map explaining 29 outcomes of guidelines from HTA organizations and their relationships. In addition, the map aggregates measures of 17 (58.6%) of these outcomes.

Conclusion: Knowledge about the outcomes of guidelines produced by HTA organizations can help physicians and decision/policy-makers in future evaluations.

  • © 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 22, Issue Supplement 1
20 Nov 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Outcomes of Guidelines from Health Technology Assessment Organizations: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Outcomes of Guidelines from Health Technology Assessment Organizations: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review
Ashkan Baradaran, Roland Grad, Isabelle Ganache, Samira Rahimi, Genevieve Gore
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6064; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6064

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Outcomes of Guidelines from Health Technology Assessment Organizations: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review
Ashkan Baradaran, Roland Grad, Isabelle Ganache, Samira Rahimi, Genevieve Gore
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 22 (Supplement 1) 6064; DOI: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6064
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Risk Factors for ICU Admission for Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Young Children in the COVID Era: A Meta-Analysis
  • Vending machines for harm reduction and community health: a systematic review
  • shared decision-making with users with complex care needs: a scoping review
Show more Systematic review, meta-analysis, or scoping review

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine