Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
OtherReflections

To Care Is to Coprovide

Stephen A. Buetow
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2005, 3 (6) 553-555; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.342
Stephen A. Buetow
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • To Care is to Coprovide: Semantics or an important difference?
    William T Branch, Jr, MD, MACP
    Published on: 13 December 2005
  • Coprovision
    Daniel L Zerbe
    Published on: 09 December 2005
  • Caring connections
    Rod MacLeod
    Published on: 09 December 2005
  • Going Beyond the Coprovision of Care
    John G. Bruhn, Ph.D
    Published on: 09 December 2005
  • Health Care Partnerships � �But Not by Prescription�
    Eva Kahana, Ph.D.
    Published on: 07 December 2005
  • Published on: (13 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for To Care is to Coprovide: Semantics or an important difference?
    To Care is to Coprovide: Semantics or an important difference?
    • William T Branch, Jr, MD, MACP, Atlanta, GA, USA
    • Other Contributors:

    Stephen Buetow proposes that true primary care requires coprovision or sharing of care between patient and provider.(1) Consumerism and paternalism in his words “should no longer be regarded as care.” Is Buetow simply restating that partnership is ideal, whereas consumerism and paternalism are less desirable ends of the spectrum? We think there is more here than semantics. One of us (WTB) has previously argued for se...

    Show More

    Stephen Buetow proposes that true primary care requires coprovision or sharing of care between patient and provider.(1) Consumerism and paternalism in his words “should no longer be regarded as care.” Is Buetow simply restating that partnership is ideal, whereas consumerism and paternalism are less desirable ends of the spectrum? We think there is more here than semantics. One of us (WTB) has previously argued for several related points. To begin, the philosophy of caring, first developed by feminist philosophers, best defines the doctor’s relationship to the patient.(2) Also, because physicians have the preponderance of power in the relationship, the physician’s ethical duty to enhance his or her patient’s autonomy in order to work with the patient as a partner is absolutely crucial.(3) Finally, Suchman and WTB explored the enormous rewards that clinicians derive from their personal engagement in caring for patients.(4) But also, patients care for their doctors. We base our comments on this idea of mutual caring.

    By mutual caring, we conceive of a sincere and appropriate attitude on the doctor’s part. On the patient’s part, there should also be sincere and appropriate participation in the relationship. And, patients do care for their doctors—in the manner of positive regard, often not overtly, but in ways one can sense.

    Ultimately, this is why we physicians strive so hard for excellence. Excellence is personal, not impersonal, because it derives from the caring relationship. And, this is why the caring relationship is truly the central tenet of doctoring.

    Everyone can name exceptions to the mutual caring role. Buetow lists some of them: the incompetent patient, the patient who doesn’t want a mutual relationship, and so forth. But as a physician, if you put your all into building relationships with your patients, these become no longer barriers; they are just the way a particular relationship unfolds.

    There may be an optimal place along the spectrum between consumerism and paternalism that we do not achieve in every situation, and the lack of a mutually caring relationship will impede us. But, a skillful physician builds this caring relationship with each interaction, aware of what the patient needs to become an informed, autonomous and engaged partner in the coprovision of care. Encounters with patients that fail to meet this exacting standard need not be a waste. Rather, they should be seen by us as an opportunity to connect on this journey of care.

    William T. Branch, Jr., MD, MACP, Director, Division of General Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, William.Branch@emoryhealthcare.org

    Nathan Spell, MD, FACP, Associate Clinical Chief, General Internal Medicine, The Emory Clinic, Inc., Nathan.Spell@emoryhealthcare.org

    References

    1. Buetow SA. To care is to coprovide. Annals of Family Medicine. 2005; 3:553-555.

    2. Branch WT Jr. The ethics of caring and medical education. Acad Med. 2000; 75:127-132.

    3. Branch WT Jr. Is the therapeutic nature of the patient-physician relationship being undermined? A primary care physician’s perspective. Archives of Internal Medicine 2000; 160:2257-2260.

    4. Branch WT Jr. Suchman AS. Meaningful experiences in medicine. Am J Med. 1990; 88:56-9.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (9 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Coprovision
    Coprovision
    • Daniel L Zerbe, Perry, NY USA

    The word "coprovision" grabbed my attention at first glance as possibly meaning something to do with staring at stool. D Zerbe

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (9 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Caring connections
    Caring connections
    • Rod MacLeod, Auckland, New Zealand

    Five years ago there was a relative dearth of literature on the medical aspects of caring. Thankfully this is beginning to change and Stephen Buetow’s reflection is a positive contribution to this discussion. I read this paper on the same day that I received Moira Stewart’s article “Reflections on the doctor-patient relationship: from evidence to practice”(1) which adds a different dimension to this debate.

    Buet...

    Show More

    Five years ago there was a relative dearth of literature on the medical aspects of caring. Thankfully this is beginning to change and Stephen Buetow’s reflection is a positive contribution to this discussion. I read this paper on the same day that I received Moira Stewart’s article “Reflections on the doctor-patient relationship: from evidence to practice”(1) which adds a different dimension to this debate.

    Buetow’s definitions of caring are interesting in that he appears to play down the ethics of caring so eloquently described by William Branch(2). Branch feels that the ethics of caring assumes that connection to others is central to what it means to be human; that relationships rather than alienation give meaning to our existence. This ethic he states is “based on the desire to be receptive to and responsible for others – to be a caring person”. This would initially seem to be at odds with what Buetow is suggesting but beneath the discussion of coprovision as the use of clinical expertise or the knowledge and experience the patient has of his/her body there is an unstated understanding perhaps of the human element of care. That care however, I would assert, can constitute paternalistic behavior – the idea that ‘doctor knows best’ is sometimes how the patient and family want it to be. Dealing with very sick and dying people we find that there are often too many things to be concerned about without having to negotiate elements of clinical intervention. In many ways therefore a paternalistic approach (or perhaps more accurately a parental approach) is called for and accepted. I would entirely agree that we must stop thinking of all clinical practice as care. If you ask patients if their doctor cares for them or about them it is surprisingly common for them to say no. By highlighting the need to reframe notions of medical care Buetow contributes much to this important debate.

    1. Stewart M Reflections on the doctor-patient relationship: from evidence to practice Brit J Gen Pract 2005 55: 793-801 2. Branch WT The ethics of caring and medical education Acad. Med. 2000 75: 127-132

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (9 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Going Beyond the Coprovision of Care
    Going Beyond the Coprovision of Care
    • John G. Bruhn, Ph.D, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

    I like Professor Buetow's concern that any interaction that does not meet patient needs is not care. He calls for the coprovision of care taking us beyond the clinician-patient interaction. I would stress that to care is to take even a broader view that extends beyond the key players in providing care, and include the many alternative therapists such as PT,OT, music therapy, massage therapy, pet therapy, and chaplains...

    Show More

    I like Professor Buetow's concern that any interaction that does not meet patient needs is not care. He calls for the coprovision of care taking us beyond the clinician-patient interaction. I would stress that to care is to take even a broader view that extends beyond the key players in providing care, and include the many alternative therapists such as PT,OT, music therapy, massage therapy, pet therapy, and chaplains, who are also players in coproviding care. The clinician has to be aware of, and believe that these interventions can meet patient's needs and contribute to their care. However, what level of care a patient can receive, or how well their needs can be met is dependent upon how they will pay for their care. The 40 some million Americans with no health insurance and who use the ER for their care will never experience what Dr. Buetow is advocating.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (7 December 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Health Care Partnerships � �But Not by Prescription�
    Health Care Partnerships � �But Not by Prescription�
    • Eva Kahana, Ph.D., USA
    • Other Contributors:

    Buetow’s essay “To Care is to Coprovide” merits attention because, in principle, it encourages dialogue about health care partnerships that involve 'co-important' contributions of clinicians, patients and caregivers in health care. The author advocates for coprovision as the true formula for care provision in Family Medicine. While the tone of this essay is proscriptive, the elements of the formula are not unpacked and...

    Show More

    Buetow’s essay “To Care is to Coprovide” merits attention because, in principle, it encourages dialogue about health care partnerships that involve 'co-important' contributions of clinicians, patients and caregivers in health care. The author advocates for coprovision as the true formula for care provision in Family Medicine. While the tone of this essay is proscriptive, the elements of the formula are not unpacked and are difficult to grasp.

    Coprovision is described as involving clinicians and patients, both of whom must be other regarding and self regarding at the same time. Clinicians and patients are each expected “to provide the expertise in health care” that they have the capacity to bring to each encounter. Coprovision is contrasted with undesirable orientations such as paternalism and consumerism. The conceptualization of coprovision is discussed in the context of social movements such as feminism and socialism and is presented as an antidote to paternalism and consumerism.

    The author urges his readers to adopt the semantics of coprovision as defining all care. By equating goals of “self regard” and “other regard”, he creates ambiguity between altruistic and self-serving values held by clinician and patient. The adverse evaluation of consumerism offered may also be hasty. While the early literature in sociology presented health care consumers in a conflict oriented perspective (Haug, 1996), recent conceptualizations regard proactive health care consumers as building collaborations with physicians (Kahana & Kahana, 2003). A model linked to “isms” has little appeal to many patients and clinicians who seek greater openness and mutual acceptance rather than ideological orthodoxy in developing health care partnerships.

    In health communication both ‘content’ and ‘affect’ are important (Kreps, 2003). The ‘content’ of this essay could benefit from more careful definition and specification, while more positive ‘affect’ toward readers with diverse viewpoints could foster reader responsiveness. Challenges to implementation of the coprovision of care should also be considered. For example, the expertise contributed by patients and clinicians may be symbolically parallel but implementing a system where each contributes “according to his ability” while meeting the needs of the other could prove to be difficult.

    Ultimately, Buetow aims to pursue a noble cause in advocating for greater recognition of real contributions of all members of the health care partnership. Recognizing the family and patient centered roots of primary care, one simply needs to add a bit of clarity and flexibility to his model.

    References Haug, M.R. (1996). The effects of physician/elder patient characteristics on health communication. Health Communication, 8(3), 249-262. Kahana, E., & Kahana, B. (2003). Patient proactivity enhancing doctor- patient communication in cancer prevention and care among the aged. Patient Education and Counceling, 50(1), 67-73. Kreps, G.L. (2003). The impact of communication on cancer risk, incidence, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Health Communication, 15(2), 161-169.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (6)
Vol. 3, Issue 6
1 Nov 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Annual Indexes
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
To Care Is to Coprovide
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
To Care Is to Coprovide
Stephen A. Buetow
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2005, 3 (6) 553-555; DOI: 10.1370/afm.342

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
To Care Is to Coprovide
Stephen A. Buetow
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2005, 3 (6) 553-555; DOI: 10.1370/afm.342
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Toward an Ecosystemic Approach to Chronic Care Design and Practice in Primary Care
  • In This Issue: Trade-Offs, Time Use, Depression Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • When the Death of a Colleague Meets Academic Publishing: A Call for Compassion
  • Let’s Dare to Be Vulnerable: Crossing the Self-Disclosure Rubicon
  • The Soundtrack of a Clinic Day
Show more Reflections

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Core values of primary care:
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Ethics

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine