Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleLessons Learned from Practice-Based Network Innovators

Mutual Learning and the Transformation of Study Intervention Tools

Lisa E. Gordon and Susan A. Flocke
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2005, 3 (suppl 2) S54-S56; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.358
Lisa E. Gordon
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan A. Flocke
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • Health promotion
  • practice-based research network
  • health promotion/disease prevention
  • Internet
  • health behavior
  • patient education

PURPOSE

We planned a multicomponent intervention to increase primary care practices’ provision of health behavior advice and patients’ access to resources for health behavior change. The intervention included 2 tools: (1) a Web-based resource (http://www.arch2healthyhabits.org) consisting of a database of community programs for health behavior change (eg, smoking cessation classes) and links to health behavior self-management resources (eg, change strategies), and (2) a prescription pad for health behavior change (Pad).1 The pocket-sized Pad, measuring 4 in by 6 in, was designed to facilitate clinician-patient discussion of health behaviors and to prompt treatment planning. The uniform resource locator (URL) and a checklist of major sections of the Web-based resource were preprinted on the Pad to assist clinicians in directing patients to the resource for additional change support. This article describes the exchanges between the study team and the participating practices that resulted in successive innovative iterations of the Pad.

METHODS

Seven practices from the Research Association of Practices (RAP), a practice-based research network, participated in the study. Practices were recruited and interventions were implemented on a rolling basis. The study had a pretest-posttest design and involved both quantitative and qualitative data collection. A practice facilitator collected 1 to 2 days of baseline ethnographic data including observations of the practice’s physical systems (eg, computer availability), current approaches to providing health behavior advice, and staff attitudes toward health promotion. Similar data were collected after the intervention. In combination with baseline patient survey data about current health behaviors and receipt of health behavior advice, the qualitative data were summarized into a practice report.

The practice facilitator led a practicewide planning meeting to discuss the baseline data and how the intervention tools might be tailored and implemented. At the close of the meeting, the facilitator encouraged formation of a smaller team consisting of a variety of practice members. This team and the facilitator met several times to brainstorm ideas, discuss options, and generate final tailoring decisions. Team decisions were typically arrived at by consensus, although clinicians’ opinions tended to carry greater weight in most of the practices.

After implementation of the intervention, ongoing interchanges between the practice and the facilitator continued in the form of telephone calls with key team members to learn how implementation plans were proceeding, drop-in visits to check supplies and maintenance of intervention procedures, and for some practices, additional team meetings to solve implementation problems. Field notes documenting each contact with a practice member were recorded.

LESSONS LEARNED

The participatory approach to tailoring the intervention and the ongoing implementation support provided by the facilitator led to a synergistic exchange of creative ideas among practices, resulting in substantial changes to the Pad. With the practice facilitator acting as a conveyor of key information about each practice’s tailoring decisions, accumulated wisdom was shared at practice team meetings to adapt the tools in successively more innovative ways. The facilitator’s stories of past developments from previously launched practices spurred brainstorming and discussion at each successive practice, resulting in additional modifications in accordance with the needs of that practice. Table 1⇓ depicts the sequence of events that led to one major change in the Pad.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

An Example of the Sequential Transformation of the Pad

Through ongoing, iterative conveyance of practices’ innovative ideas via the facilitator, the Pad’s design and method of use were further modified. For example, practice 6 engaged medical assistants to check off health behavior topics the patient wished to discuss. The Pad was then clipped to the chart for the clinician. Used in this manner, the Pad was transformed into a screening tool and clinician reminder. Other innovations included printing the Pad in a distinctive color to enhance its use as a clinician reminder and adding visual icons for use with low-literacy patients in place of written advice.2 What started as a prescription pad for health behavior change was transformed through the cumulative wisdom of 7 practices into a new, multipurpose tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we intended to tailor the tools to practices’ needs, the methods used in this study facilitated changes in the tools’ intended use and design beyond our expectations. For such innovations to occur, the research team must assume roles as both learners and conduits of cumulative participant wisdom, rather than as experts.

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the clinicians, staffs, and patients from the 7 family practices that participated in this project: Neighborhood Family Practice; the practice of Drs Weinberger and Vizy, and Ms DuBay, PA; the practice of Dr Kellner; the practice of Dr Kirsch; Southwest Family Physicians; the Metrohealth Thomas F. McCafferty Health Center; and University Primary Care (Bedford location).

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: none reported

  • Funding support: This project was supported by Prescription for Health (grant No. 049058, Dr Flocke), a national program of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation with support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Dr Flocke was also supported in part by a career development award from the National Cancer Institute (CA 86046).

  • Received for publication January 25, 2005.
  • Revision received March 15, 2005.
  • Accepted for publication March 21, 2005.
  • © 2005 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Swinburn BA, Walter LG, Arroll B, Tilyard MW, Russell DG. The green prescription study: a randomized controlled trial of written exercise advice provided by general practitioners. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:288–291.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Houts PS, Witmer JT, Egeth HE, Loscalzo MJ, Zabora JR. Using pictographs to enhance recall of spoken medical instructions II. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;43:231–242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (suppl 2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (suppl 2)
Vol. 3, Issue suppl 2
1 Jul 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mutual Learning and the Transformation of Study Intervention Tools
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Mutual Learning and the Transformation of Study Intervention Tools
Lisa E. Gordon, Susan A. Flocke
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2005, 3 (suppl 2) S54-S56; DOI: 10.1370/afm.358

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Mutual Learning and the Transformation of Study Intervention Tools
Lisa E. Gordon, Susan A. Flocke
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2005, 3 (suppl 2) S54-S56; DOI: 10.1370/afm.358
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • PURPOSE
    • METHODS
    • LESSONS LEARNED
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • LEAP—A Brief Intervention to Improve Activity and Diet: A Report From CaReNet and HPRN
  • It Takes a Partnership: The Value of Collaboration in Developing and Promoting a Web Site for Primary Care Patients
  • The Healthy Teen Project: Tools to Enhance Adolescent Health Counseling
Show more Lessons Learned from Practice-Based Network Innovators

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Health promotion
  • Other research types:
    • PBRN research
  • Other topics:
    • Organizational / practice change

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine