Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleCASE STUDIES AND COMMENTARIES

Successful Turnaround of a University-Owned, Community-Based, Multidisciplinary Practice Network

Michael K. Magill, Robin L. Lloyd, Duane Palmer and Susan A. Terry
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2006, 4 (suppl 1) S12-S18; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.540
Michael K. Magill
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin L. Lloyd
MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Duane Palmer
MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan A. Terry
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Academic Health Centers in the Future of Family Medicine
    James C. Martin
    Published on: 25 October 2006
  • Primary care networks
    John W. Saultz
    Published on: 06 October 2006
  • Comments on: "Successful Turnaround of a University-Owned, Community-Based, Multidisciplinary Practice Network."
    George Kikano, MD
    Published on: 01 October 2006
  • Lessons Learned
    Barbara L Thompson
    Published on: 29 September 2006
  • Published on: (25 October 2006)
    Page navigation anchor for Academic Health Centers in the Future of Family Medicine
    Academic Health Centers in the Future of Family Medicine
    • James C. Martin, San Antonio,Texas

    Dr.Magill's article relating to the development of a more financially successful(viable) primary care base for an acadmic health center(AHC)system demonstrates one of several roles that departments of family medicine can provide within that setting.His department's active involvement and obviously significant role in addressing a serious issue should be shared with other FM departments facing similar issues within their...

    Show More

    Dr.Magill's article relating to the development of a more financially successful(viable) primary care base for an acadmic health center(AHC)system demonstrates one of several roles that departments of family medicine can provide within that setting.His department's active involvement and obviously significant role in addressing a serious issue should be shared with other FM departments facing similar issues within their own institutions.

    As we continue to respond to the challenges stressed in the FFM report and recommendations,the value and identity of family medicine in the Academic Health Center remains critical. Being seen as the "go-to" department for clinical care quality and efficiency is certainly a major step in the right direction.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (6 October 2006)
    Page navigation anchor for Primary care networks
    Primary care networks
    • John W. Saultz, Portland, Oregon, USA

    The special edition of the Annals focusing on the role of family medicine departments within academic health centers is welcomed and timely. Many of our universities developed primary care clinical networks during the era of managed care. In some cases, these networks were created to serve community needs, but most of them were created to insure an uninterrupted flow of referrals and admissions to the university hospit...

    Show More

    The special edition of the Annals focusing on the role of family medicine departments within academic health centers is welcomed and timely. Many of our universities developed primary care clinical networks during the era of managed care. In some cases, these networks were created to serve community needs, but most of them were created to insure an uninterrupted flow of referrals and admissions to the university hospital. The article by McGill et al describes how one such network has evolved and provides instructive lessons for other institutions. Utah seems to have developed their network somewhat later than many other institutions. Here in Oregon we developed our network in 1993-4 and began to shrink it's size by 2001. At its peak, we were operating 10 sites and are now down to only 6. Four of these six remaining practices are family medicine clinics and all of the closed clinics were staffed by general internists or pediatricians as the medicine and pediatric departments downsized their interest and activities in primary care. This paralleled rather closely the demise of comprehensive managed care insurance for most people in our area.

    Our experience is similar to Utah's in that we have become profitable when educational costs are considered. But our practices are all teaching clinics and have residents and students assigned as part of the provider workforce. Our workload and efficiency have increased dramatically as has the demand for our services from patients searching for a comprehensive medical home.

    In Oregon, like much of the rest of the country, the number of uninsured has grown dramatically. We have converted two of our four family medicine practices into a community health center look-alike and a rural health center. This has allowed us to expand the number of medicaid and uninsured people we serve. The remaining two clinics care for university employees and their families and others from the community. More patients are now paying for their care in cash as their deductibles and co-pays increase. And many more of them are opting out of traditional health insurance for medical savings accounts. This is clearly starting to change the commercial interaction upon which our practices function as businesses. This trend seems to be quite confusing to many of our academic health center's leaders. In response, we are focusing much more on making patients happy and serving their needs better rather than simply making health plans happy and seeking favorable contracts.

    I think these financial changes in the market are the first stages of radical change in our health economy and I certainly agree with McGill and colleagues that our university health systems will be turning to anyone with a coherent plan during these challenging times. The Future of Family Medicine project is such a plan. But our department is by no means looking for permission or direction from our institution in pursuing these goals. We are asserting our own initiative and making our own clinical practices into models for the future. I think the rest of our institution will follow us in this direction and will be better off in doing so.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (1 October 2006)
    Page navigation anchor for Comments on: "Successful Turnaround of a University-Owned, Community-Based, Multidisciplinary Practice Network."
    Comments on: "Successful Turnaround of a University-Owned, Community-Based, Multidisciplinary Practice Network."
    • George Kikano, MD, Cleveland, USA

    This issue of Annals of Family Medicine‘s supplement “Shaping the Future of Academic Health Centers: The Role of Family Medicine Faculty and Departments” summarizes many reports on “best practice” presented at the annual AAMC meeting in 2005 and sponsored by the Association of the Departments of Family Medicine (ADFM). The case study by Magill et al describes the turnaround of a multispecialty-physician group at the Univ...

    Show More

    This issue of Annals of Family Medicine‘s supplement “Shaping the Future of Academic Health Centers: The Role of Family Medicine Faculty and Departments” summarizes many reports on “best practice” presented at the annual AAMC meeting in 2005 and sponsored by the Association of the Departments of Family Medicine (ADFM). The case study by Magill et al describes the turnaround of a multispecialty-physician group at the University of Utah which had previously posted a loss of more than $21 million during the year of its inception and consecutive financial losses in the years following. In a five-year period, the university-owned physician network was turned into profitability.

    Changes in the healthcare system were accelerated with the dominance of managed care companies that started in the early 1990s. All elements of healthcare delivery, from independent solo physicians to academic health centers (AHCs) felt the need to reinvent themselves in order to survive. One of the strategies utilized by AHCs was the development of physicians’ networks, mostly in primary care. The main objective was to align these physicians with the organization hoping to grow market share and generate referrals for subspecialists as well as tertiary and quaternary care. Throughout the country, there were multiple models of governance, employment, administration and financing. By the turn of the century, managed care influence was fading and many of these physicians’ networks were either incurring financial losses or abandoned altogether.

    Magill and colleagues provide an excellent overview of the strategies utilized to reengineer their physicians’ network leading into an efficient patient-centered model and profitability. Lessons learned from this experience in Utah include: • The importance of the support, commitment and vision of the institutional leadership. Despite significant losses, the leadership in Utah affirmed their commitment to this endeavor and had the foresight to select proper leadership from among the physicians. • Physicians’ governance and establishment of teams of physicians and administrators both at the corporate level and at the local office sites, thus avoiding “us versus them” scenarios. This model paid attention to the clinical and financial aspects of the organization. • An outpatient delivery model was created to maximize efficiency, provide patient-centered services through innovative, open-access scheduling and leveraging information technology to improve communication and services. • Most importantly, the turnaround gradually integrated network physicians with the academic mission. Sites were utilized for students’ and residents’ teaching and selectively for research projects.

    Our experience in the Cleveland, Ohio area, though different in structure from the Utah example, is comparable in many ways to the one described. Our health system University Hospitals Health System (UHHS) with its academic health center, University Hospitals of Cleveland (UHC) started developing a primary care network in the early 1990s through the acquisition of existing independent physicians, physicians' groups or establishing new practice sites based on demographic market analysis and/or strategic alliances. More than a decade later, our community-based network is now a major player in the delivery of ambulatory services in Northeast Ohio. The network has both primary care physicians and selected subspecialists to meet the demands of suburban patients and owned or affiliated community hospitals. From its inception, physicians in this network have taught our medical students and collected research data for our Practice Based Research Networks (PBRNs).

    Many case studies presented in this supplement point to the important roles primary care physicians can play in leading institutional initiatives, delivering efficient patient care and meeting the academic mission of Academic Health Centers. It is critical for our policymakers to evaluate our failing health care system and implement changes to meet the growing demands of our people and communities. International data as well CMS experience among different states validate the importance of having a strong primary care base. AHCs can and should take the lead in reforming our healthcare system.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (29 September 2006)
    Page navigation anchor for Lessons Learned
    Lessons Learned
    • Barbara L Thompson, Galveston,Texas

    At UTMB in Galveston in the 1990's, the institution decided to buy a number of primary care practices and establish others with the idea of feeding insured patients into our own hospital and successfully competing with health care plans that were moving into the Houston area and required a PCP to act as a "gatekeeper". We made the typical mistakes of too much overhead, and not setting productivity expectations and paying...

    Show More

    At UTMB in Galveston in the 1990's, the institution decided to buy a number of primary care practices and establish others with the idea of feeding insured patients into our own hospital and successfully competing with health care plans that were moving into the Houston area and required a PCP to act as a "gatekeeper". We made the typical mistakes of too much overhead, and not setting productivity expectations and paying high dollar salaries for these physicians. We lost a lot of money, and closed many of those clinics. We are now considering a plan to re-establish a primary care network that looks more like the one described by Dr. Magill in Utah.

    This article is very helpful in pointing out the previous problems and pitfalls, but also the interventions that seem to be working. As the saying goes, if we do not remember the mistakes of the past, we are doomed to repeat them. We will be much more cautious this time as we try to evaluate what our surrounding population really needs and specifically where to put primary care and where to put specialty services, and which ones to use.

    Our problem continues to be the national and state problem of the large number of uninsured patients, almost 33% in our area. All of us in the Houston/Galveston area are competing for a small percentage of commercially insured patients to achieve a modest positive margin, so we can stay afloat and keep our eye on our real mission which is to serve the poor people of Texas. It is getting harder and harder to do this.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 4 (suppl 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 4 (suppl 1)
Vol. 4, Issue suppl 1
1 Sep 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Successful Turnaround of a University-Owned, Community-Based, Multidisciplinary Practice Network
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Successful Turnaround of a University-Owned, Community-Based, Multidisciplinary Practice Network
Michael K. Magill, Robin L. Lloyd, Duane Palmer, Susan A. Terry
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2006, 4 (suppl 1) S12-S18; DOI: 10.1370/afm.540

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Successful Turnaround of a University-Owned, Community-Based, Multidisciplinary Practice Network
Michael K. Magill, Robin L. Lloyd, Duane Palmer, Susan A. Terry
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2006, 4 (suppl 1) S12-S18; DOI: 10.1370/afm.540
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quality, Satisfaction, and Financial Efficiency Associated With Elements of Primary Care Practice Transformation: Preliminary Findings
  • Correlation of the Care by Design™ Primary Care Practice Redesign Model and the Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home
  • OUT OF THE IVORY TOWER: ENGAGING THE NATIONAL DIALOGUE ON THE PATIENT-CENTERED MEDICAL HOME
  • Shaping the Future of Academic Health Centers: The Potential Contributions of Departments of Family Medicine
  • In This Issue: Capacity for Caring and Generating New Knowledge
  • The Utah Primary Care Experience
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Michigan Clinical Research Collaboratory: Following the NIH Roadmap to the Community
  • A Workforce Analysis Informing Medical School Expansion, Admissions, Support for Primary Care, Curriculum, and Research
  • Social Accountability in Theory and Practice
Show more CASE STUDIES AND COMMENTARIES

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Other topics:
    • Organizational / practice change

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine