Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Different Paths to High-Quality Care: Three Archetypes of Top-Performing Practice Sites

Chris Feifer, Lynne Nemeth, Paul J. Nietert, Andrea M. Wessell, Ruth G. Jenkins, Loraine Roylance and Steven M. Ornstein
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2007, 5 (3) 233-241; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.697
Chris Feifer
DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynne Nemeth
PhD, RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul J. Nietert
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea M. Wessell
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth G. Jenkins
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Loraine Roylance
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven M. Ornstein
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Technophile's response
    Susan T Andrews
    Published on: 05 June 2007
  • Paths using practice archetypes may lead in the wrong direction
    David G Litaker
    Published on: 05 June 2007
  • Published on: (5 June 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Technophile's response
    Technophile's response
    • Susan T Andrews, Murfreesboro, TN, USA

    Participation in the research network PPRNet has brought our practice immense satisfaction as well as dramatically improved the health of our patients. Our practice recognizes itself as a member of the technophile group. One of the most important factors in our improvement is having accurate data reflecting our level of care. This gives us motivation and helps us direct our efforts at improvement. As Chris Feifer poin...

    Show More

    Participation in the research network PPRNet has brought our practice immense satisfaction as well as dramatically improved the health of our patients. Our practice recognizes itself as a member of the technophile group. One of the most important factors in our improvement is having accurate data reflecting our level of care. This gives us motivation and helps us direct our efforts at improvement. As Chris Feifer points out, we set up our practice workflow and EHR to minimize effort while maximizing ease of adhering to practice guidelines for both health maintenance and chronic disease management. Although we are solidly in the Technophile group, we’re increasing our use of techniques of the Motivated Team. Our nurses have expanded duties. They have become providers alongside our doctors using standing orders to update overdue immunizations, labs and tests, coming up with ideas for improvement, motivating our patients, and soon, helping with group visits. As part of the AAFP TransforMED demonstration project, we’ve also become a much more effective team, having daily huddles before seeing patients and running effective weekly meetings of subgroups of the practice. PPRNet through its site visits and annual meetings has taught us how to assess what we need to improve, change processes to improve care, and then reevaluate our results to see if they were effective.

    Although this particular study is over, the techniques have become a part of our practice culture. We continue to analyze our reports quarterly, choose indicators to work on, and change processes. Our next step is to offer group visits for patients with diabetes. This fits under the area of Care Enterprise. Over time, each group may adopt more techniques of the other groups so that we may become less identifiable.

    As an effort to obtain evidence-based CME for a presentation on EHRs, I’ve found literature supporting the fact that systematic use of an EHR can bring definite improvement in adherence to practice guidelines, but that having an EHR alone does not improve care. The practitioner needs to mine the data, and then needs to make use of features of the EHR as well as modify work processes to improve care. Chris Feifer outlined the techniques we used well. The PPRNet model has much to offer practices that wish to focus on quality.

    1. Kensaku Kawamoto, et al: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 22, No. 1, 34-41 (2007).

    2. Ornstein SM, Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG, Wessell AM, Feifer C, Corley ST: Improving Diabetes Care through a Multi-component Quality Improvement Model in a Practice-Based Research Network. American Journal of Medical Quality, 2007, 22(1): 34-41 Website: http://ajm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/22/1/34 This article reports the impact of a multi-component quality improvement intervention on adherence diabetes care guidelines. Significant improvements occurred for 12 of 13 measures showing that intervention can have robust effects on care. The providers all used the same EHR and received feedback on the indicators quarterly.

    3. Ornstein SM, Jenkins RG, Nietert PJ, Feifer C, Roylance LF, Nemeth L, Corley S, Dickerson L, Bradford WD, Litvin, C: Multi-Method Quality Improvement Intervention to Improve Cardiovascular Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial, Annals of Internal Medicine, 2004; 141(7):523-532 http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/141/7/523 Improved performance on cardiovascular indicators were documented using intervention techniques that included EHR use.

    4. Orzano, A. John MD, MPH, et al: Improving Outcomes for High-Risk Diabetics Using Information Systems. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 20(3):245-251, May/June 2007. http://www.jabfm.org/cgi/content/full/20/3/245 Conclusions: Use of relatively simple systems to identify and track patient information can improve diabetic care outcomes. Practices making investments in an EHR must recognize that this technology alone is not sufficient for achieving desirable clinical outcomes. Researchers must explore the interrelationships of organizational factors necessary for successful information use.

    5. Nagykaldi, Zsolt PhD; Mold, James W. MD, MPH. The Role of Health Information Technology in the Translation of Research into Practice: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 20(2):188-195, March/April 2007. http://www.jabfm.org/cgi/content/full/20/2/188 This study documents how the implementation of a clinical reminder system in an EHR improved adherence to practice guidelines.

    6. Devine, Emily Beth, et al: Characterization of prescribing errors in an internal medicine clinic. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 64(10):1062-1070, May 15, 2007. Implementation of an electronic prescribing system with drug interaction and allergy checking may decrease the frequency of serious errors.

    7. Sistine A. Barretto, et al: Linking Guidelines to Electronic Health Record Design for Improved Chronic Disease Management: Evidence Based Guidelines and EHR references. AMIA Annual Symposium Procedures. 2003; 2003: 66–70. Rousseau N, MCColl E, Newton J, Grimshaw J, Eccles M. Practice based longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ. 2003 3268 Feb; This report shows problems with awkward efforts of using computer to improve adherence to guidelines. American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 18, No. 4, 150-154 (2003) 8. Jeffrey East, MD, MPH: Impact of a Diabetes Electronic Management System on Patient Care in a Community Clinic; Published online February 23, 2007 Diabetes Care 30:1137-1142, 2007 This supports the use of an electronic registry for improving diabetes care. 9. Davis Bu, MD, MA et al.: Benefits of Information Technology–Enabled Diabetes Management. BMJ 2005;330:765 (2 April), All IT techniques used in the study improved care and reduced expenditures.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (5 June 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Paths using practice archetypes may lead in the wrong direction
    Paths using practice archetypes may lead in the wrong direction
    • David G Litaker, Cleveland, Ohio

    Feifer and colleagues seek to identify recurring themes in the use of specific strategies that represent practice “archetypes” for improvement within a group of high-performing practices participating in a national demonstration project (1). One of the key messages of this paper is a hopeful one: that there exist many potential practice strategies to achieve high performance.

    An assertion worth questioning, how...

    Show More

    Feifer and colleagues seek to identify recurring themes in the use of specific strategies that represent practice “archetypes” for improvement within a group of high-performing practices participating in a national demonstration project (1). One of the key messages of this paper is a hopeful one: that there exist many potential practice strategies to achieve high performance.

    An assertion worth questioning, however, is that the archetypes identified are appropriate as guides for other practices to follow on the “path to improvement”. Others have suggested, for example, that reconfiguring practices to conform to an “ideal” may have the unintended consequence of reducing or eliminating variation in work processes (and outcomes) that are appropriate to local circumstances (2,3). Indeed, important elements missing from the practice characteristics obtained from multiple sources of qualitative and quantitative data in this study are those relating to context, or the setting in which the practice is embedded. It is easy to envision a practice conforming to the “Technophile” archetype described in this paper that fails miserably in attaining high performance goals in certain organizational contexts or socioeconomic settings.

    A second practice characteristic largely unaddressed in this study is readiness to change - a dynamic and evolving quality. Factors such as how practice staff view their options for change, the extent to which motivation to act toward a specific goal is shared, the allocation of power, patterns and types of communication, and features of the “web of relationships” have been suggested as important in positioning practices to adopt and implement evidence-based practice or initiatives to improve care (4,5).

    Perhaps practice archetypes exist and can be useful in characterizing or classifying high-performing practices. Their use as paths to improvement, however, ignores the vast and, as yet, poorly understood complexity of primary care. Using them as guides without first considering practice context, readiness to change and interpersonal dynamics may lead some practices toward unintended and potentially counterproductive destinations.

    References: 1. Feifer C, Ornstein SM. Strategies for increasing adherence to clinical guidelines and improving patient outcomes in small primary care practices. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30(8):432-41. 2. Flocke SA, Litaker D. Physican practice patterns and variation in the delivery of preventive services. J Gen Int Med. 2007;22:191-6. 3. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Tallia AF, et. al. Delivery of clinical preventive services in family medicine offices. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(5):430 -5. 4. Cohen D, McDaniel R, Crabtree BF, et. al A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice. J Healthc Manag. 2004;49(3):150-70. 5. Thomas P, While A. Increasing research capacity and changing the culture of primary care towards reflective inquiring practice: the experience of the West London Research Network (WeLReN). J Interprofessional Care. 2001;15(2):133-139.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (3)
Vol. 5, Issue 3
1 May 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Different Paths to High-Quality Care: Three Archetypes of Top-Performing Practice Sites
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Different Paths to High-Quality Care: Three Archetypes of Top-Performing Practice Sites
Chris Feifer, Lynne Nemeth, Paul J. Nietert, Andrea M. Wessell, Ruth G. Jenkins, Loraine Roylance, Steven M. Ornstein
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2007, 5 (3) 233-241; DOI: 10.1370/afm.697

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Different Paths to High-Quality Care: Three Archetypes of Top-Performing Practice Sites
Chris Feifer, Lynne Nemeth, Paul J. Nietert, Andrea M. Wessell, Ruth G. Jenkins, Loraine Roylance, Steven M. Ornstein
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2007, 5 (3) 233-241; DOI: 10.1370/afm.697
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2021
  • 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2020
  • 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2019
  • 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2018
  • 1. Promoting Health and Reducing Disparities in Populations
  • 1. Strategies for Improving Care
  • 1. Strategies for Improving Care
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2014
  • Characteristics of primary care practices associated with high quality of care
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2013
  • Does the "Office Nurse" Level of Training Matter in the Family Medicine Office?
  • Measuring the Impact of Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs)
  • The Role of the Champion in Primary Care Change Efforts: From the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP)
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2012
  • No Longer Simply a Practice-based Research Network (PBRN): Health Improvement Networks
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2011
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2010
  • High Performance in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) Case Study
  • The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
  • In This Issue: New Concepts for Diabetes and Chronic Disease Management
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Mixed methods
  • Other research types:
    • PBRN research
  • Other topics:
    • Health informatics
    • Quality improvement
    • Organizational / practice change

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine