Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
EditorialEditorials

The Problem of Fragmentation and the Need for Integrative Solutions

Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2009, 7 (2) 100-103; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.971
Kurt C. Stange
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Fragmentation in healthcare
    Bruce Bagley
    Published on: 03 May 2010
  • The First Principle
    Dr. Ian R. McWhinney
    Published on: 10 April 2009
  • Fragmentation: We Might Know More Than We Think We Know
    Chris van Weel
    Published on: 30 March 2009
  • Bravo!
    Frank J Baudino
    Published on: 25 March 2009
  • Reintegration could involve also improvement of the truncated clinical method
    Rodolfo J. Stusser
    Published on: 23 March 2009
  • fractured care and the need for integrated medical practice
    Alfred G. (Gus) Kious, MD
    Published on: 20 March 2009
  • Smart Healthcare: Integrative Solutions supporting a Comprehensive Healing Relationship
    Paul H Grundy MD, MPH
    Published on: 12 March 2009
  • Published on: (3 May 2010)
    Page navigation anchor for Fragmentation in healthcare
    Fragmentation in healthcare
    • Bruce Bagley, Leawood, Kansas USA
    Kurt, Thanks for your commentary on fragmentation. The focus of care must be on the patient and not those that provide services for compensation. The right question for the patient with fatigue is "What is going on in your life?" The physician must be thinking "What is making this person sick?" or "Why do they need to be sick?" After you have gone through that exercise then it is OK to check for anemia. Fragmentation is largel...
    Show More
    Kurt, Thanks for your commentary on fragmentation. The focus of care must be on the patient and not those that provide services for compensation. The right question for the patient with fatigue is "What is going on in your life?" The physician must be thinking "What is making this person sick?" or "Why do they need to be sick?" After you have gone through that exercise then it is OK to check for anemia. Fragmentation is largely the result of our payment system. "I got my portion of the payment, now you get yours." Nothing about our current system fosters a shared responsibility for cost and quality. It certainly does not reward in any significant way, the critical ingredient that is a continuous healing relationship between patient and clinician or care team. Health, wellness and disease are so inextricably linked to the human condition and the individual in it, that any parsing of the problem results in a lesser likelihood of finding the best way to help.

    Bruce Bagley, M.D.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (10 April 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for The First Principle
    The First Principle
    • Dr. Ian R. McWhinney, London, Ontario, Canada

    Kurt, this is a very important series. Congratulations! The basic problem is that so many GPs have ceased to honour the first principle of general practice (Family Medicine). The principle is that whatever problem our patients bring to us, we will never say: “I don’t do this.” If I think you need a specialist, I will find an appropriate specialist for you, but whatever he or she does for you, I still will be your doc...

    Show More

    Kurt, this is a very important series. Congratulations! The basic problem is that so many GPs have ceased to honour the first principle of general practice (Family Medicine). The principle is that whatever problem our patients bring to us, we will never say: “I don’t do this.” If I think you need a specialist, I will find an appropriate specialist for you, but whatever he or she does for you, I still will be your doctor.

    As it happens, nearly all the problems I see in my practice are dealt with myself.

    My commitment to you is not just to look after one particular illness, but to care for you as a person, whatever problem you may have. As a patient said to me once: “I want a doctor who specializes in me.”

    For our relationship to work well I ask you to call on me or one of my colleagues for all your needs. If you feel that a specialist is required I will be pleased to advise you as to the best one. The most important level is the generalist (or family medicine) which are concerned with relationships. We don’t have specialties (except as a side interest). A functioning generalist level make things much easier for the specialist level.

    If we fail to honour the first principle, we will break up into one hundred pieces and general practice will die.

    Could it be that we are not teaching the first principle?

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (30 March 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Fragmentation: We Might Know More Than We Think We Know
    Fragmentation: We Might Know More Than We Think We Know
    • Chris van Weel, the Netherlands

    Fragmentation of healthcare has been branded in the Editorial [1]. At about the same time of its publication, the Dutch Inspectorate of health care aired its concerns of the fragmentation of cancer care in The Netherlands: even within the care of a single patient, oncologists, surgeons and radiotherapists are often working from their own agenda – an observation stressing the essential point of the editorial.

    Fragm...

    Show More

    Fragmentation of healthcare has been branded in the Editorial [1]. At about the same time of its publication, the Dutch Inspectorate of health care aired its concerns of the fragmentation of cancer care in The Netherlands: even within the care of a single patient, oncologists, surgeons and radiotherapists are often working from their own agenda – an observation stressing the essential point of the editorial.

    Fragmentation stands in the way of capitalizing from the important progress that has been made in medical science. What is haunting health care, is the ill considered copying of the model of focus in science, into profound specialization in clinical practice: the experience that every disease should be understood in its own patho-physiologal right, and the gains this brought in knowledge, have been mirrored by sub- specialization in health care. The enhanced knowledge of diseases and its mechanisms did lead to ‘a physician for every disease’. And this, in turn, has now translated in disrupted and uncoordinated care. In particular now co-morbidity is becoming a regular, rather than an exceptional, feature of the population [2], this is rapidly reaching the point where it is becoming a threat to the effectiveness of health care.

    What is particularly worrying when looking back to the development of sub –specialization is the absence of any evidence of its wisdom. Or even more frustrating, it has taken place against the emerging evidence of how integrating, rather than segregating, skills is essential to secure good health outcomes. Sub-specialization as furthered clinical expertise, but ignored the trusting, ‘healing’ relation [3] between doctors and their patients. Clinical expertise is essential in the treatment of patients with major disease – for example: depression – but its effect is co- determined by a trusting physician – patient relation [4]. And probably even more important: clinical expertise can be transferred from subspecialists to generalists – much more readily than the individual trusting relation.

    Current developments in co-morbidity may indicate how a solution is to be found – or how this solution may further split the medical world of specialists and generalists. There is a clear push to approach ‘co- morbidities’ through an adding-up of available, single-disease derived evidence, and maximize interventions. On the other hand, a recent study in the UK on depression made clear that family physicians are reluctant to prescribe the full range of available, evidence-based interventions in patients with co-morbidity – in particular antidepressants – even when these performance was financially incentivized [5, 6]. A logical explanation of this could be that generalists are seeking generic interventions that are relevant for more than one condition at the same time (like empowerment and lifestyle changes) [7].

    It is more than time, to revisit the expanding domain of primary care research and as a form of secondary analysis look for the evidence of why integration, person centeredness and a generalist approach are determining effectiveness. These concepts have been valuable hypotheses – but it is more than likely that there is more, and that the evidence is already there, before our very eyes.

    References
    1 Stange Stange KC. The Problem of Fragmentation and the Need for Integrative Solutions Ann Fam Med 2009;7:100-103.
    2 Weel C van. Chronic diseases in general practice – the longitudinal dimension. Eur J Gen Pract 1996; 2: 17-21
    3 McWhinney IR. Family Medicine, a textbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997 2nd edition.
    4 Van Os TW, van den Brink RH, Tiemens BG, Jenner JA, van der MK, Ormel J. Communicative skills of general practitioners augment the effectiveness of guideline-based depression treatment. J Affect Disord 2005;84:43-51.
    5 Kendrick T, Dowrick C, McBride A, Howe A, Clarke P, Maisey S, et al. Management of patients assessed with depression severity questionnaires in UK general practice: analysis of medical record data. BMJ 2009;338:b 750
    6 Dowrick C, Leydon GM, McBride A, Howe A, Burgess H, Clarke P, et al. Patients’ and doctors’ views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in the UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study. BMJ 2009;338: b663
    7 Weel C van, Weel-Baumgarten E van, Rijswijk E van. Treatment of depression in primary care. BMJ 2009, 338:934

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (25 March 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Bravo!
    Bravo!
    • Frank J Baudino, Merced, CA, USA

    I thank you for eloquently voicing the ideas that have also been circulating in my head the last several years. More people need to read these essays. I hope you send them to members of Congress and to President Obama.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (23 March 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Reintegration could involve also improvement of the truncated clinical method
    Reintegration could involve also improvement of the truncated clinical method
    • Rodolfo J. Stusser, Havana, Cuba. Primary Care e-Research Collaboration Center http://havanacenter.familydoctors.net
    Dear Editor of the Annals Kurt C. Stange,

    I congratulate this Annals’ series, and am very impressed with your first article. The US system faces similar problems [1] as all developed nations, plus the inequality of only 67% of easiest access to low quality and cheap primary preventive and healing centered-patient care. This contrasts with 100% of the smoothest egalitarian entrance in the world highest quality and expensive e...

    Show More
    Dear Editor of the Annals Kurt C. Stange,

    I congratulate this Annals’ series, and am very impressed with your first article. The US system faces similar problems [1] as all developed nations, plus the inequality of only 67% of easiest access to low quality and cheap primary preventive and healing centered-patient care. This contrasts with 100% of the smoothest egalitarian entrance in the world highest quality and expensive emergency and therapeutic hospital disease-care.

    The US system has top increasing costs, not only because of the free market economy, but also due to a political will, investing highest funding in the world leading scientific and technological, most expensive research in hardest sciences for hardest evidence.

    The preventability of chronic sub-clinical or clinical diseases’ progression has less and softer evidence;[2] depends of health education, freedom of choice, and individual responsibility for her/his health, which cannot be totally assumed by the primary care. Whereas, the therapeutic of diseases’ complications, are easier controlled by the hospital.

    There are two core realities. The US medicine, health, and living systems function under a successful and complex equilibrium achieved by a freest partnership of strong private and public sectors, difficult to regulate. Even, having so many needs of improvement,[1] thanks to 200-year US results, at least the non-poorest 5.5 billions of the world 6.5 billion population, are increasingly enjoying a great part of the top scientific achievements in global medicine, health, and living cares, levels and standards, of all the times.

    The crisis of low-quality primary preventive and healing centered-patient research and care in the US is part of a long world health research and care crisis. In it, both patient and doctor feel the lack of a comprehensive propedeutics and clinical approach to the health problems, because the clinical method is truncated mostly for physical health.[3]

    Research field fragmentation is the key approach of contemporary empirical sciences. Since the 1700s, it disintegrated family medicine and primary health care in internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics, and psychiatry for the modern hospital research and care. The individual’ health process was divided in “body” and “mind”, because the mind was not reachable then as well as the body with the scientific empirical methods of validation, obviating her/his feelings, fears, and expectations, utter understanding and care. From 1945, hundreds of hospitals and institutes’ subspecialties, atomized patient care.[3,4]

    The re-integration and re-classification of the individual’s health process need of the most original discoveries and inventions of family medicine science, to reach a high-quality primary preventive patient and healing-centered care, comprehensive clinical method. This will allow reaching a highest-level family medicine research and care of 70-80% of the patients’ main primary health problems --so far, “functional”, “psychosomatic” or “non-organic” disorders. It will permit including more complex mental and social issues, reducing the costs in unnecessary technology, because the comprehensive clinical management of the whole patient health, will be considered the main scientific approach.

    We must research the evolution of sickness and self-healing, family-healing, and member healing of an immediate group, from the earliest historical phases until the beginnings of modern scientific medicine with the doctor healing.[5] Now, we count with oceans of higher qualitative and quantitative levels of empirical and theoretical contemporary knowledge on medicine, physics, chemistry, biology, psychology, and social sciences.

    Thank you and good luck!

    References:
    1. Stange KC. The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions. Ann Fam Med 2009;7(2):100-103. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/full/7/2/100
    2. Le Fanu J. The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine. 1st ed. New York: Carrol & Graf Publ., Inc., 2000.
    3. Stusser RJ. Reflections on the scientific method in medicine. In: Medical Sciences, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. Oxford: Eolss Publishers, 2006. http://www.eolss.net
    4. McWhinney IR. (1986). Are we on the brink of a major transformation of clinical method? CMAJ 1986;135(8):873-8.
    5. Fabrega H Jr. Earliest phases in the evolution of sickness and healing. Med Anthropol Q. 1997;11(1):26-55.

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (20 March 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for fractured care and the need for integrated medical practice
    fractured care and the need for integrated medical practice
    • Alfred G. (Gus) Kious, MD, East Cleveland, Ohio, USA

    Great article! As the President of an acute care inner-city hospital and a board certified family physician, my perspective has a peculiar twist. The fractured care is a direct result of the way we organize ourselves and the way we keep score. We organize ourselves by design and by history into small units of care that are linked loosely to form channels of care. Most of these units are independent and narrowly focus...

    Show More

    Great article! As the President of an acute care inner-city hospital and a board certified family physician, my perspective has a peculiar twist. The fractured care is a direct result of the way we organize ourselves and the way we keep score. We organize ourselves by design and by history into small units of care that are linked loosely to form channels of care. Most of these units are independent and narrowly focused. The intent to meet the broader community need is unfocused and generally not tightly connected. Since each entity is on its own balance sheet and has its own shareholders, they are motivated further to focus on their own business rather than the larger good. While a medical home is desireable and even necessary it is insufficient to bring all entities together in a coordinated and integrated care continuum for the good of a population. Moreover, primary care continues to be a contact and individualistic activity rather than a team reality. Finally, because we keep score and reward ourselves as individual units the motivation is to grow and prosper continuously even at the expense of other care units. In this way, through financial controls and rewards, we undermine the very desire we have to form a seamless, coordinated, and superior care delivery system for the benefit of a population. The present economic crisis gives us the burning platform to jump from the security of the known system to the uncertainty and promise of something bigger and better. This article should be a call to arms by every physician for something better rather than calling support for established and past practices.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (12 March 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Smart Healthcare: Integrative Solutions supporting a Comprehensive Healing Relationship
    Smart Healthcare: Integrative Solutions supporting a Comprehensive Healing Relationship
    • Paul H Grundy MD, MPH, Hopewell Junction, USA

    The single most import part of healing is the RELATIONSHIP it is the very foundation that healthcare of value starts with -- has to start with. To carry that one step further this relationship has to support the longitudinal comprehensive care of our patient built on a strong base of primary care and prevention. Smart healthcare can support that relationship by improving communication. It can allow expanded communicati...

    Show More

    The single most import part of healing is the RELATIONSHIP it is the very foundation that healthcare of value starts with -- has to start with. To carry that one step further this relationship has to support the longitudinal comprehensive care of our patient built on a strong base of primary care and prevention. Smart healthcare can support that relationship by improving communication. It can allow expanded communication with a patient; it can empower the doctor not to forget to ask an important question be it about the patient’s person life or a key fact to the healing process. Smart healthcare can send little reminders of care compassion and yes importantly express a doctor’s investment in a person who needs a healer and healing. A smart healthcare system can help with compassion remind the patient of the important things that would otherwise be missed in a busy doctors life like e-reminders of a visit, or that mammogram that was forgotten to be completed.

    Smart healthcare makes sure that the right drug is used on the right patient at the right time, taking into account the person’s genetic makeup other medications they are taking. It ensures the authenticity of pharmaceuticals and the security of patient information. It changes everything from how healthcare organizations do business to how the patient and doctor in enabled to collaborate and innovate.

    Smart healthcare is also giving rise to a new model for primary care, the “patient centered medical home.” About three years ago, the people at IBM started talking about all the things that large employers in the U.S. have done to reduce costs and improve quality. We realized we were failing to address a fundamental issue: primary care and the doctor patient relationship. Without that as the very base the very foundation Problem of Fragmentation and the Need for Integrative Solutions would never be solved.

    In the Patient Centered medical home model, a primary care physician acts as a healthcare coach – leading a team that manages a patient’s wellness, preventative and chronic care needs. The doctor spends more time with the patient in person, is available for consultations via email or phone, and has expanded hours and coordinates across an entire care team – nurses, specialists, pharmacists and hospitals. The patient team has a target on them and is paid to deliver all the patients “Integrative Solutions” with the tools, the right teams and most importantly the healing relationships to deliver that. This is what we want to buy at IBM for our employees

    A diabetic could give daily blood test readings by phone, email or remote monitoring device and get instructions the moment she needs them, rather than wait for an appointment. Her care team would have a holistic health plan that focuses on diet and exercise as well as monitoring glucose levels.

    This is happening I saw it a week ago at the University of Utah clinic I saw it in Portland. All over the country the patient centered model of care is rolling out and it makes healthcare more accessible and effective – and makes patients happier and it delivers the relationships and tools to do true care integration.

    Health information technology – which are central to the U.S. healthcare stimulus bill – are pivotal to making medical homes work. HIT such as a registry, eRx are the source of information that can be shared across a network of providers and specialists. There are other IT tools that can help patients and doctors alike – online portals to make appointments or look up lab results, or e-prescribing. Health analytics can look across a patient’s history and pick up trends that provide insight into the treatment of a disease. The list goes on. But it is so important and can not be stress enough that the key is not the the technology which are just tools to support. The Key the care and compassion in the longitudinal comprehensive doctor patient relationship the key is the healing relationship.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (2)
Vol. 7, Issue 2
1 Mar 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Problem of Fragmentation and the Need for Integrative Solutions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Problem of Fragmentation and the Need for Integrative Solutions
Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2009, 7 (2) 100-103; DOI: 10.1370/afm.971

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Problem of Fragmentation and the Need for Integrative Solutions
Kurt C. Stange
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2009, 7 (2) 100-103; DOI: 10.1370/afm.971
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • AN INTERACTIVE SERIES
    • THE PROBLEM OF FRAGMENTATION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Association of polydoctoring and mortality among persons over 85 years with multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study in Japan
  • Primary care family physicians experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol
  • Optimising personal continuity: a survey of GPs and older patients views
  • Time for Family Medicine to Stop Enabling a Dysfunctional Health Care System
  • Approaches to improving patient safety in integrated care: a scoping review
  • Optimising personal continuity: a survey of GPs and older patients views
  • Primary care physicians perceptions of social determinants of health recommendations: a qualitative study
  • Effect of a hospital command centre on patient safety: an interrupted time series study
  • Evaluating the safety and patient impacts of an artificial intelligence command centre in acute hospital care: a mixed-methods protocol
  • Cancer Survivorship Care Roles for Primary Care Physicians
  • Fragmented health and well-being services as contributing barriers in overcoming the unmet needs of a population with special needs
  • Dedicated Workforce Required to Support Large-Scale Practice Improvement
  • Prevalence of care fragmentation among outpatients attending specialist clinics in a regional hospital in Singapore: a cross-sectional study
  • Unfinished Business: The Role of Research in Family Medicine
  • Impact of sharing electronic health records with patients on the quality and safety of care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol
  • Forces for Integration
  • Preventing gatekeeping delays in the diagnosis of rare diseases
  • Impact of multimorbidity on healthcare professional task shifting potential in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: a French cross-sectional study
  • Recording a diagnosis of stroke, transient ischaemic attack or myocardial infarction in primary healthcare and the association with dispensation of secondary preventive medication: a registry-based prospective cohort study
  • In This Issue: Tools to Help Focus on What is Valuable
  • Polypharmacy: Americas other drug problem
  • Evaluation of DementiaNet, a network-based primary care innovation for community-dwelling patients with dementia: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods multiple case study
  • Achieving Coordinated Care for Patients With Complex Cases of Cancer: A Multiteam System Approach
  • Holding On and Letting Go: A Perspective from the Keystone IV Conference
  • Recognising the role of primary care in cancer control
  • A Participatory Model of the Paradox of Primary Care
  • Back to the Future: Reflections on the History of the Future of Family Medicine
  • Hennepin Health: A Safety-Net Accountable Care Organization For The Expanded Medicaid Population
  • RCGP Continuity of Care Toolkit: promoting relational continuity
  • Understanding the Context of Health for Persons With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Moving From What Is the Matter to What Matters
  • Systems and Complexity Thinking in the General Practice Literature: An Integrative, Historical Narrative Review
  • The Future of Family Medicine Version 2.0: Reflections from Pisacano Scholars
  • Increasing Access to Care for Brazos Valley, Texas: A Rural Community of Solution
  • Community of Solution for the U.S. Health Care System: Lessons from the U.S. Educational System
  • Communities of Solution: The Folsom Report Revisited
  • Delivering a national programme of anticipatory care in primary care: a qualitative study
  • In This Issue: Challenges of Managing Multimorbidity
  • A tale of two cultures: Specialists and generalists sharing the load
  • Protecting generalism: moving on from evidence-based medicine?
  • Primary Care Practice Development: A Relationship-Centered Approach
  • Context for Understanding the National Demonstration Project and the Patient-Centered Medical Home
  • In This Issue: Relationships Count for Patients and Doctors Alike
  • Power to Advocate for Health
  • Ways of Knowing, Learning, and Developing
  • Organizing Health Care for Value
  • A Science of Connectedness
  • The Paradox of Primary Care
  • A Way Forward for Health Care and Healers
  • The Generalist Approach
  • In This Issue: Practice, Research, and Reflection
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Thank You, Reviewers and Commenters
  • Recruiting, Educating, and Taking Primary Care to Rural Communities
  • Returning to a Patient-Centered Approach in the Management of Hypothyroidism
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Coordination / integration of care
    • Personalized care
    • Relationship
    • Science of connectedness / practice of generalism
  • Other topics:
    • Disparities in health and health care
    • Social / cultural context

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine