Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Management of Test Results in Family Medicine Offices

Nancy C. Elder, Timothy R. McEwen, John M. Flach and Jennie J. Gallimore
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2009, 7 (4) 343-351; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.961
Nancy C. Elder
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy R. McEwen
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Flach
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennie J. Gallimore
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Re: Managing tests - how can we involve the patient?
    Nancy C. Elder
    Published on: 17 August 2009
  • Managing tests - how can we involve the patient?
    Milton "Mickey" Eder
    Published on: 12 August 2009
  • Published on: (17 August 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Re: Managing tests - how can we involve the patient?
    Re: Managing tests - how can we involve the patient?
    • Nancy C. Elder, cincinnati, OH, USA

    Thank you for your most appropriate comments regarding the important role the patient plays in the testing process. I agree that our study was not set up to address this issue, and that further research is definately needed in this area.

    We believe that patients are integral to safety and quality, and that primary care practices must find ways to involve patients without abdicating the responsibility that must u...

    Show More

    Thank you for your most appropriate comments regarding the important role the patient plays in the testing process. I agree that our study was not set up to address this issue, and that further research is definately needed in this area.

    We believe that patients are integral to safety and quality, and that primary care practices must find ways to involve patients without abdicating the responsibility that must ultimately lie with the office practice. Patients can be encouraged to serve as "double checkers" for the receipt of results. With shared decision making, patients are involved and educated throughout the testing process, including when the tests are ordered, ("what is the purpose of the test? How will the results affect the care plan? when and how will I get results?") as well as when they are notified of results and follow up is discussed.

    Appropriate technology and a culture of safety and quality should enhance the role of the patient in this process, but research will be necessary to discover the "appropriate" technology and the aspects of the safety culture that improve patient involvement in the testing process.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (12 August 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Managing tests - how can we involve the patient?
    Managing tests - how can we involve the patient?
    • Milton "Mickey" Eder, Chicago, IL

    This study takes a multi-methods approach to exploring the management of test results in primary care offices. The authors identify a lack of standardized processes within offices and failures throughout the results management process as primary sources of patient risk and harm; given the current health care reform debate, we should recognize that these issues also point to laboratory tests as an inefficiently used resou...

    Show More

    This study takes a multi-methods approach to exploring the management of test results in primary care offices. The authors identify a lack of standardized processes within offices and failures throughout the results management process as primary sources of patient risk and harm; given the current health care reform debate, we should recognize that these issues also point to laboratory tests as an inefficiently used resource.

    I am working with Nancy Elder and other researchers on a multi- methods study to examine how a network of community health centers manages the testing and referral process. We also found a lack of standardized office systems and communication/coordination failures at each stage of the testing process as factors that diminish patient safety and increase risks and the potential for patient harm.

    The current study suggests that offices with effective technology and staff with heightened safety awareness possess a greater likelihood of developing high reliability systems for managing tests. While the effective use of technology can improve communication between the laboratory and the office in the management of specimens and results, it is less clear that heightened safety awareness by staff includes concerns about using technology effectively. It is also not clear if there is a sense of how technology should or can be used to improve communication between staff and patients for patient notification and follow-up on test results. Additional work is welcomed so that we may understand better the potential role technology can play in the way family medicine practices activate patients around tests to reduce risk by fostering increased involvement in their own care.

    While technology and heightened staff awareness of patient safety occupy key roles in the design of high reliability office test management systems, we also need to add patient activation to the equation. In an environment where primary care offices are increasingly called upon to serve as patient-centered medical homes and to produce improved patient health outcomes, we will all benefit from research that examines patient activation as an additional factor for improving the quality and reliability of office systems.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (4)
Vol. 7, Issue 4
1 Jul 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Management of Test Results in Family Medicine Offices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Management of Test Results in Family Medicine Offices
Nancy C. Elder, Timothy R. McEwen, John M. Flach, Jennie J. Gallimore
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2009, 7 (4) 343-351; DOI: 10.1370/afm.961

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Management of Test Results in Family Medicine Offices
Nancy C. Elder, Timothy R. McEwen, John M. Flach, Jennie J. Gallimore
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2009, 7 (4) 343-351; DOI: 10.1370/afm.961
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • System hazards in managing laboratory test requests and results in primary care: medical protection database analysis and conceptual model
  • Laboratory testing in general practice: a patient safety blind spot
  • Routine failures in the process for blood testing and the communication of results to patients in primary care in the UK: a qualitative exploration of patient and provider perspectives
  • Test result communication in primary care: a survey of current practice
  • Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study
  • Developing a preliminary 'never event list for general practice using consensus-building methods
  • Laboratory test ordering and results management systems: a qualitative study of safety risks identified by administrators in general practice
  • In This Issue: Systematic Strategies and Individualized Approaches to Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
  • Adverse Outcomes Associated With Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Mixed methods
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine