Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal ResearchA

A Novel Approach to Office Blood Pressure Measurement: 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure vs Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Mark C. van der Wel, Iris E. Buunk, Chris van Weel, Theo A. B. M. Thien and J. Carel Bakx
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2011, 9 (2) 128-135; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1211
Mark C. van der Wel
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.vanderwel@elg.umcn.nl
Iris E. Buunk
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris van Weel
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theo A. B. M. Thien
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Carel Bakx
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Timing is everything - response to comment of Myers
    Mark C. van der Wel
    Published on: 06 April 2011
  • A Novel Approach to Office Blood Pressure Measurement: 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure vs Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure.
    Willem Jan Verberk
    Published on: 06 April 2011
  • Only five minutes is required to record automated office blood pressure
    Martin G. Myers
    Published on: 18 March 2011
  • Published on: (6 April 2011)
    Page navigation anchor for Timing is everything - response to comment of Myers
    Timing is everything - response to comment of Myers
    • Mark C. van der Wel, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Other Contributors:

    For the use of serial automated office blood pressure (AOBP) in daily practice a separate room, with comfortable, standardized conditions and the possibility of uninterrupted blood pressure measurements is needed. This will require logistic planning/ organization and we prefer to advise a structural, not ad hoc solution, for this problem. In our view organizing this room will be the major feasibility challenge. Once orga...

    Show More

    For the use of serial automated office blood pressure (AOBP) in daily practice a separate room, with comfortable, standardized conditions and the possibility of uninterrupted blood pressure measurements is needed. This will require logistic planning/ organization and we prefer to advise a structural, not ad hoc solution, for this problem. In our view organizing this room will be the major feasibility challenge. Once organized the duration of measurement will only affect the maximum number of patients to be measured in a given time.

    Our study demonstrated good agreement of 30 min OBPM and daytime ABPM. We have data (to be published) which will support this conclusion in a different set of patients. As mentioned in the discussion section of our article the study of Culleton et al differed greatly from ours. The use of three different measurement devices, the procedure and duration of the complete study protocol and different definitions of daytime ABPM will all have contributed to the differences in study outcome.

    It is likely that depending on setting and country (history in types of blood pressure measurements available, guidelines, current use of ABPM devices, financial incentives) users will prefer purpose built devices for AOBP, like BpTru and Microlife WatchBP Office or the use of ABPM devices. We agree with Myers that both the number of readings and the time interval between readings are relevant for a valid AOBP. However we like to add the rest period before taking BP as relevant variable. From figure 1 in our publication we derive that even with one minute interval measurements it will matter at what moment in time these measurements are taken.

    In future research we therefore would like to explore the minimum number of readings, the minimum time interval between measurements and the timing of measurements in the natural course of blood pressure required for most valid results. In this evaluation we will have to take both the technological abilities (e.g. with respect to minimum measurement interval) of different types of blood pressure measurement devices and logistic preferences into account. This approach will support widespread use of reliable and functional AOBP despite differences in settings of daily practice.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (6 April 2011)
    Page navigation anchor for A Novel Approach to Office Blood Pressure Measurement: 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure vs Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure.
    A Novel Approach to Office Blood Pressure Measurement: 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure vs Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure.
    • Willem Jan Verberk, Taipei, Taiwan

    Van der Wel and colleagues compared 30-minute office blood pressure measurement (OBPM) to daytime ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) 1. Due to the white coat effect, not following guidelines, observer bias and poor reproducibility the value of “regular” OBPM is limited 2. For this reason a new approach as suggested seems an interesting and good alternative. However, the following items may be considered: 1) Meye...

    Show More

    Van der Wel and colleagues compared 30-minute office blood pressure measurement (OBPM) to daytime ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) 1. Due to the white coat effect, not following guidelines, observer bias and poor reproducibility the value of “regular” OBPM is limited 2. For this reason a new approach as suggested seems an interesting and good alternative. However, the following items may be considered: 1) Meyers and colleagues showed that 5 or 10 minutes of readings is sufficient to obtain values similar to daytime ABPM average 3. In addition, from Figure 1 it seems that overall blood pressure (BP) reaches a steady state after 10 minutes. Therefore, 15 minutes of measurement might already be sufficient. It would have been useful if the authors had expanded their analysis and compared different numbers and combinations ofreadings with the average daytime ABPM value. 2) The authors performed 8 BP readings with 5 minute-intervals and decided to calculate the average by discarding the first 2 measurements. This helps to largely eliminate the white coat and cuff response but may not be necessary as previous studies could not demonstrate that discarding the first measurement led to better association with ABPM 3, 4. 3) A great benefit of ABPM is that a patient is measured away from the physician’s office during (limited) normal daily activities and stressful moments, as this is absent with 30-min OBPM it may lead to underestimation of BP values. 4) Some patients used antihypertensive drugs. Although the authors indicate that this does not bias the results, not all antihypertensive drugs provide a long and smooth BP lowering effect 5. Therefore, the time at which 30-min OBPM is assessed may have a significant influence on the BP values. 5) The authors classified patients by hypertensive subtypes. When general OBPMs were lacking they used the first two measurements of the 30-min OBPM. Although this might be comparable with general OBPM the chance to find patients with masked hypertension (MH) is very small since BP values are unlikely to increases after these first two measurements. Notwithstanding the above limitations of 30-min OBPM it reduces or eliminates several important limitations of regular OBPM and therefore most likely provides a more reliable estimation of a patients’ true BP value. However, as BP often cannot be reliably estimated from a single visit a second visit may still be required for optimal diagnosis. Seen in this context one might consider performing self-measurement of BP instead as this leads to more measurements on separate days and might reduce the substantial burden for healthcare workers and patients when leading to less clinical visits 6.

    1. van der Wel MC, Buunk IE, van Weel C, Thien TA, Bakx JC. A Novel Approach to Office Blood Pressure Measurement: 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure vs Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure. Ann Fam Med 2011;9:128-135. 2. Pickering TG, Gerin W, Schwartz JE, Spruill TM, Davidson KW. Franz Volhard lecture: should doctors still measure blood pressure? The missing patients with masked hypertension. J Hypertens 2008;26:2259-2267. 3. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. J Hypertens 2009;27:280- 286. 4. Graves JW, Grossardt BR. Discarding the first of three nurse- auscultatory or oscillometric blood pressure measurements does not improve the association of office blood pressure with ABPM. Blood Press Monit 2010;15:146-151. 5. Stergiou GS, Efstathiou SP, Skeva, II, Baibas NM, Roussias LG, Mountokalakis TD. Comparison of the smoothness index, the trough : peak ratio and the morning : evening ratio in assessing the features of the antihypertensive drug effect. J Hypertens 2003;21:913-920. 6. Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, Kessels AG, de Leeuw PW. Home blood pressure measurement a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:743-751.

    Competing interests:   Willem Verberk is an employee of Microlife Taipei, Taiwan

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (18 March 2011)
    Page navigation anchor for Only five minutes is required to record automated office blood pressure
    Only five minutes is required to record automated office blood pressure
    • Martin G. Myers, Toronto, Canada

    This study examined automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurement by adapting a 24-hour BP recorder for office use in order to ‘standardize’ the office and out-of-office measurements. This approach limited the shortest time interval between office BP measurements to five minutes which resulted in six readings being taken over a 30-minute period. There are several concerns about this prolonged period being needed...

    Show More

    This study examined automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurement by adapting a 24-hour BP recorder for office use in order to ‘standardize’ the office and out-of-office measurements. This approach limited the shortest time interval between office BP measurements to five minutes which resulted in six readings being taken over a 30-minute period. There are several concerns about this prolonged period being needed to record office BP.

    Thirty minutes is too long to be feasible for routine clinical practice. Previous research (Culleton et al, BP Monitoring 2006;11:37-42) has shown that recording BP over 25 minutes can give readings which are ‘basal’ and not ‘casual’. That is, the AOBP is substantially lower than the awake ambulatory BP. For some reason, AOBP readings taken over 30 minutes in the present study were similar to the awake ambulatory BP. I cannot explain the difference between the two studies which used similar protocols although differences in patient populations may have been a factor.

    Other studies using the BpTRU and SpaceLabs 90207 ABPM recorder have shown similar decreases in office BP recorded over 5 to 10 minutes with the patient being alone, without any 5 minute antecedent period of rest. The SpaceLabs recorder has been used in numerous clinical trials involving many thousands of patients. Both this device and the BpTRU have passed independent validation studies. If there is any difference between AOBP and awake ambulatory BP because of the use of different devices, such differences are almost certainly very small, likely in the range of 1 mmHg.

    It seems that the number of automated readings is more important than the time interval between readings. There would be no advantage in recording BP every five minutes if the elimination of the white coat response can be achieved by recording BP every one to two minutes, as has been shown in previous studies. In our most recent study in hypertensive patients, AOBP readings taken at one-minute intervals were similar to the mean awake ambulatory BP obtained using the SpaceLabs 90207 device (BP Monitoring 2010;15:300-304).

    Thus, this study confirms that AOBP can be used to reduce or eliminate the white coat response with the mean office BP being similar to the awake ambulatory BP. However, it is not necessary to take readings every five minutes using a 24-hour ABPM device in the office setting. Other devices specifically designed for professional use in the office such as the BpTRU, Omron HEM 907 and Microlife WatchBP Office are available to record AOBP over a much shorter period (5 to 10 minutes) which is more feasible for routine clinical practice.

    (A review of AOBP up to 2010 by Myers et al can be found in: Hypertension 2010;55:195-200)

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (2)
Vol. 9, Issue 2
March/April 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Novel Approach to Office Blood Pressure Measurement: 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure vs Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Novel Approach to Office Blood Pressure Measurement: 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure vs Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure
Mark C. van der Wel, Iris E. Buunk, Chris van Weel, Theo A. B. M. Thien, J. Carel Bakx
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2011, 9 (2) 128-135; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1211

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
A Novel Approach to Office Blood Pressure Measurement: 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure vs Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure
Mark C. van der Wel, Iris E. Buunk, Chris van Weel, Theo A. B. M. Thien, J. Carel Bakx
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2011, 9 (2) 128-135; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1211
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effectiveness of a new one-hour blood pressure monitoring method to diagnose hypertension: a diagnostic accuracy clinical trial protocol
  • It is Time to Change How We Measure Blood Pressures in the Office
  • Thirty-Minute Office Blood Pressure Monitoring in Primary Care
  • Thirty-minute compared to standardised office blood pressure measurement in general practice
  • The Conversation Continues, as It Should
  • Guided Care
  • In This Issue: Back to Basics: Talking, Listening, and Low-Tech Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Disease pathophysiology / etiology
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine