Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Corticosteroid Injections for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care

Aaltien Brinks, Rogier M. van Rijn, Sten P. Willemsen, Arthur M. Bohnen, Jan A. N. Verhaar, Bart W. Koes and Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2011, 9 (3) 226-234; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1232
Aaltien Brinks
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rogier M. van Rijn
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sten P. Willemsen
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arthur M. Bohnen
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan A. N. Verhaar
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bart W. Koes
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Participant flowchart.

    HNP=hernia nuclei pulposi.

    a All patients were included in the repeated measurement analysis.

    b For the repeated measurement analysis on recovery, at least 1 follow-up assessment was needed to be included in the analysis.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Course of mean pain intensity (and standard error) at rest and on activity during the 12-month follow-up period for injection group (n = 60) and usual care group (n = 59), on a visual analog scale (VAS)

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Course of recovery during 12-months for injection group (n = 60) and usual care group (n = 60).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of the Study Population at Baseline

    CharacteristicUsual Care Group (n=60)Intervention Group (n=60)Total (N=120)
    EQ-5D = EuroQol; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
    a Scored on a range from 0–100, with high values indicating more pain or lower physical functioning.
    b Scored on a range from 0–10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst conceivable pain.
    c Scored on a range from 0–1, where 0 = worst quality of life and 1 = best quality of life.
    Age, mean (SD), y54.8 (14.7)57.7 (13.9)56 (14.3)
    Women, n (%)48 (80)44 (73.3)92 (76.7)
    Paid job, n (%)24 (40)26 (43.3)50 (41.7)
    Body mass index, mean (SD)26.3 (3.6)26.9 (3.8)26.6 (3.7))
    WOMAC pain, mean (SD)a52.4 (19.1)48.8 (16.1)50.6 (17.7)
    WOMAC function, mean (SD)a49.2 (19.6)43.9 (17.0)47.0 (18.4)
    Pain at rest, mean (SD)b5.33 (2.2)5.05 (2.2)5.19 (2.2)
    Pain with activity, mean (SD)b6.63 (2.6)6.82 (1.9)6.73 (2.3)
    Quality of life, EQ-5D,mean (SD)c0.72 (0.2)0.76 (0.2)0.74 (0.2)
    Education level, n (%)
        Low (vocational)17 (28.3)22 (36.7)39 (32.5)
        Middle (secondary)33 (55)29 (48.3)62 (51.7)
        High (university)10 (16.7)9 (15)19 (15.8)
    Duration of complaints, n (%)
        1–2 mo30 (50.8)27 (45.0)57 (47.9)
        2–6 mo14 (23.7)20 (33.3)34 (28.6)
        >6 mo15 (25.4)13 (21.7)28 (23.5)
    Comorbidity, n (%)
        None25 (41.7)22 (36.7)47 (39.2)
        Low-back pain21 (35)22 (36.7)43 (35.8)
        Hip osteoarthritis8 (13.3)10 (16.7)18 (15)
        Low-back pain and hip osteoarthritis6 (10)6 (10)12 (10)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures at the 3- and 12-Month Follow-up

    Usual Care (n = 59)Injection (n=60)
    OutcomeBaseline3 mo12 moBaseline3 mo12 mo3 mo OR (95% CI)12 mo OR (95%CI)
    EQ-5D = a quality-of-life instrument from EuroQol; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
    a Fully or strongly recovered.
    b Adjusted for baseline values of the outcome.
    c Scored on a range from 0–10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst conceivable pain.
    d Scored on a range from 0–100, with high values indicating more pain or lower physical functioning.
    e Scored on a range from 0–1, where 0 = worst quality of life and 1 = best quality of life.
    Recovered,n/N (%)a–20/59 (34)33/55 (60)–33/60 (55)34/56 (61)2.38 (1.14 to 5.00)1.05 (0.50 to 2.27)
    Difference at 3 mo (95% CI)bDifference at 12 mo (95% CI)
    Pain at rest, mean (SD)c5.3 (2.2)3.7 (2.5)2.3 (2.3)5.1 (2.2)2.5 (2.5)2.1 (2.5)1.18 (0.31 to 2.05)0.14 (−0.75 to 1.04)
    Pain with activity, mean (SD)c6.6 (2.60)4.8 (2.8)3.2 (2.9)6.7 (1.9)3.6 (2.8)2.8 (2.8)1.30 (0.32 to 2.29)0.45 (−0.55 to 1.46)
    Secondary outcomes
        WOMAC pain, mean (SD)d52.4 (19.1)37.6 (22.7)122.9 (22.8)48.8 (16.1)23.6 (21.3)18 (19.6)12.40 (4.86 to 19.93)2.67 (−4.98 to 10.32)
        WOMAC function, mean (SD)d49.2 (19.6)34.2 (21.3)21.7 (22.7)43.9 (17.0)21.3 (19.3)17.4 (19.6)11.36 (4.01 to 18.70)1.01 (−6.37 to 8.39)
        EQ-5D, mean (SD)e0.72 (0.2)0.79 (0.17)0.85 (0.17)0.74 (0.2)0.81 (0.2)0.82 (0.2)−0.02 (−0.08 to 0.04)−0.004 (−0.05 to 0.06)
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Reported Number of Adverse Events at 6 Weeks

    Adverse EventIntervention GroupUsual Care Group
    Hot flushes1112
    Disturbance in menstruation pattern35
    General allergic reaction (eg, itching all over the body, urticaria, head-ache, shortness of breath)912
    Superficial pain at site of injection
        < 1 day230
        ≥1 day30
        Missing110
    Other reported side-effects
        Insensible spot10
        Extravasation of blood10
        Sore spot10
        Small lump at injection place10

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Corticosteroid Injections for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care

    Aaltien Brinks , and colleagues

    Background Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS), also known as trochanteric bursitis, is a common cause of hip pain. This study compared usual care (analgesic pain medicines as needed) and corticosteroid injection in primary care patients with GTPS.

    What This Study Found For patients with GTPS, corticosteroid injections offer better short-term pain relief than pain medicines. At the 3-month follow-up, 34 percent of patients in the usual care group had recovered compared with 55 percent in the injection group. At 3 months, pain severity at rest and on activity decreased in both groups, but the decrease was greater in the injection group. At the 12-month follow-up visit, the differences in outcomes were no longer present.

    Implications

    • Although local corticosteroid injections are frequently given for GTPS, this study is the first to examine the additional value of injection therapy, providing physicians with a more evidence-based rationale for offering it to patients.
  • Correction

    Brinks A, van Rijn RM, Willemsen SP, et al. Corticosteroid injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(3):226-234.

    Under the Participants heading in the Methods section, the American College of Rheumatology criteria for osteoarthritis should include morning stiffness of up to 60 minutes, not longer than 60 minutes as mentioned in this study.

    In Table 2. Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures at the 3- and 12-Month Follow-up. Under the column heading Secondary outcomes, Usual Care, 3 mo, a superscript 1 beside (22.7) in the 2nd set of numbers across from WOMAC pain, Mean (SD), is in error and should be ignored.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (3)
Vol. 9, Issue 3
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Corticosteroid Injections for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Corticosteroid Injections for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care
Aaltien Brinks, Rogier M. van Rijn, Sten P. Willemsen, Arthur M. Bohnen, Jan A. N. Verhaar, Bart W. Koes, Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2011, 9 (3) 226-234; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1232

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Corticosteroid Injections for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care
Aaltien Brinks, Rogier M. van Rijn, Sten P. Willemsen, Arthur M. Bohnen, Jan A. N. Verhaar, Bart W. Koes, Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2011, 9 (3) 226-234; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1232
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • CORRECTION
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Use and safety of corticosteroid injections in joints and musculoskeletal soft tissue: guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, and the International Pain and Spine Intervention Society
  • ICON 2019--International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: There are nine core health-related domains for tendinopathy (CORE DOMAINS): Delphi study of healthcare professionals and patients
  • Education plus exercise versus corticosteroid injection use versus a wait and see approach on global outcome and pain from gluteal tendinopathy: prospective, single blinded, randomised clinical trial
  • Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection versus placebo injection in hip osteoarthritis: a 12-week blinded randomised controlled trial
  • Education plus exercise versus corticosteroid injection use versus a wait and see approach on global outcome and pain from gluteal tendinopathy: prospective, single blinded, randomised clinical trial
  • Conservative treatments for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a systematic review
  • Endoscopic Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome of the Hip
  • Imaging and management of greater trochanteric pain syndrome
  • In This Issue: Personalizing Health Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
  • Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Acute illness
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine