Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
OtherOn TRACK

The Conversation Continues, as It Should

John J. Frey
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2011, 9 (3) 271-272; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1253
John J. Frey III
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

In response to the article on using oral steroids as a diagnostic test to distinguish between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma by Broekhuizen and colleagues,1 the discussion turns in part to one of nosology, as Hahn puts it: when, along the continuum of a lifetime of lung disease, do asthma and COPD become part of an overlap syndrome in which “pure” asthma can evolve into “pure” COPD over time?2 Boundaries in clinical medicine are often, if not always, fuzzy, and using steroids to distinguish between 2 clinical entities, where steroids have an effect in both, is not helpful. As Crownover mentions, the situation is particularly vexing when an empirical trial of steroids for treatment, which is recommended in some guidelines, rather than diagnosis confounds the issue.3 The anti-inflammatory effect of steroids can help in infection as well as reactive airway disease. Furthermore, Van Schayck points out that there is very little indication for inhaled steroids, and they should not be confused with oral steroids for management in situations where there is not a clear diagnosis of asthma.4 All respondents agree on 2 points: the standards for management are neither clear or gold, have to do with the populations of patients in whom they are developed, and are not simple in what is often a mixed disease state. More primary care based studies should help management at that level.

The description by Coppin and colleagues5 of irrigation of ears for wax buildup as a preventive measure to decrease clinic visits got the attention of a number of respondents who wanted to know whether the composition of the ear drops was specific and reproducible.6,7 McCarter speculated that plain water might be just as good8 but reminded me of what I was told by a teacher that, whether with plain water or the “ear drops” in this study, the last thing one should do is leave an ear canal wet, so a drying agent should be in order in all cases. Bartels suggested a proprietary preparation that is on the market.9 My mother used olive oil, and a patient recently mentioned “sweet oil” but wasn’t clear when I enquired just exactly what sweet oil is. Although Bartels’ warning of possible mechanical trauma made me remember another admonition “not to put anything sharper than your elbow in your ear canal,” I suspect that gentle lavaging with a low-pressure bulb syringe, as Coppin mentions, is low risk for trauma, given the lack of any adverse consequences in their study.

The article by van der Wel and colleagues10 on the serial office measurement of blood pressures in a relaxed environment drew 2 thoughtful comments that should be considered when implementing a process in one’s clinic to follow the guidelines in the article. Myers challenged, based on his data, the need for a 30-minute period of measurement and argues for a shorter period of time with more frequent measurements. As he writes: “Thirty minutes is too long to be feasible for routine clinical practice.”11 Verbek goes over a great deal of the information on ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the literature and suggests that home monitoring might have some value in contrast to the study in the Annals:

Seen in this context one might consider performing self-measurement of BP instead as this leads to more measurements on separate days and might reduce the substantial burden for healthcare workers and patients when leading to less clinical visits.12

So, take your choice—rely on shorter periods of measurement to fit a more realistic office setting or have patients measure themselves to avoid unnecessary office visits. Van der Wel responds to both in an equally thoughtful manner.13

In a commentary on Wilkinson and colleagues’ study14 on obstacles to mammography screening in women with intellectual disabilities, Miller and Li raise the important and difficult point of informed consent for screening of all types for people with disabilities. As they mention, in their practice, most patients are in group homes with caretakers, a population that may differ from the patients in the study, who appear to be more independent.15 In any case, Wilkinson agrees, and the patients in their study were consenting to the study, not the mammograms; informed consent, she agrees, will continue to be important to sort through with patients who may or may not understand general recommendations for screening.16

“ ‘Trust’ is clearly a many-splendored thing—and a difficult idea to quantify. I’m not sure the authors have quite got a handle on it in this scale. But I definitely think this is a topic worth pursuing.”17 So writes Jessie Gruman from the Center for Advancing Health in a very personal commentary on the article by Thom and colleagues18 on the development of an instrument for measuring the physician’s trust of their patient. In addition to the very quantitative measurement in the Annals article, Kramer adds a comment suggesting that “psychological safety” is an essential component to the discussion of trust:

In climates characterized by high psychological safety, Edmondson [whose research Kramer cites] has shown across a variety of settings (including medical), individuals are more likely to appropriate help, useful diagnostic feedback, self-disclose their concerns regarding possible errors or perceived problems, and engage in more creative, collaborative problem solving.19

A scale may be important but perceptions are everything.

Finally, the article on the Ontario Family Health Team model of organizing and paying for primary care20 drew a number of comments and insights from luminaries in both Canada and the United States who are looking for ways to operationalize medical homes. Carol Herbert, former dean of the University of London, Ontario, says it best:

Research findings to date support the FHT as a model that provides incentives to achieving patient-centred care. It is a model that makes it possible to answer a generation of disappointed and frustrated family practice graduates who have come back to us, their teachers, to say they cannot practise the way they were taught in their residency programs—the system doesn’t let them…. Previous experiments, such as community health centres in the 1970’s, were criticized because of decreased throughput. In this round of experimentation, we must determine what is the gold standard for number of patient visits just as we must monitor the reward systems to ensure that “pay for performance” does not become a perverse incentive.21

And Carlos Jaén, from the United States, commenting on lessons learned from the practices in the National Demonstration Project on the PCMH writes:

Advanced Primary Care systems (such as the PCMH and FHT) are front and center as a sure way to achieve the Triple Aim (higher quality, lower cost and better patient experience). However, we fool ourselves if we want to implement them in the absence of payment reform, without regional support for bringing more clinicians to the front lines, local control in the allocation of resources, and EHRs that work and talk to each other. The NDP practices remind us that it is possible to implement most of the elements but more support is needed.22

Amen.

Join the discussion of articles at http://www.annfammed.org.

  • © 2011 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Broekhuizen BD, Sachs AP, Moons KG, et al. Diagnostic value of oral prednisolone test for chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):104–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    Hahn DL. More empiricism needed in lung disease nosology [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/104#21950, 16 Mar 2011.
  3. ↵
    Crownover BK. Steroid benefit in COPD management confounds use as diagnostic agent [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/104#22074, 3 Apr 2011.
  4. ↵
    Van Schayck P. Oral steroid reversibility testing in patients with cough should come to an end [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/104#22018, 25 Mar 2011.
  5. ↵
    Coppin R, Wicke D, Little P. Randomized trial of bulb syringes for earwax: impact on health service utilization. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):110–114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Frank OR. Nature of “ear drops” may influence outcome [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/110#21943, 15 March 2011.
  7. ↵
    Dawson KL. What exactly are ‘ear drops’ [eletter]? http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/110#21964, 18 Mar 2011.
  8. ↵
    McCarter DF. Is this really for everyone? And why not just use water [eletter]? http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/110#22068, 1 Apr 2011.
  9. ↵
    Bartels LJ. Ear irrigation is not always safe [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/110#22037, 27 Mar 2011.
  10. ↵
    Van der Wel MC, Buunk IE, van Weel C, Thien TA, Bakx J. A novel approach to office blood pressure measurement: 30-minute office blood pressure vs daytime ambulatory blood pressure. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):128–135.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Myers MG. Only five minutes is required to record automated office blood pressure [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/128#21961, 18 Mar 2011.
  12. ↵
    Verbek WJ. A novel approach to office blood pressure measurement: 30-minute office blood pressure vs daytime ambulatory blood pressure [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/128#22076, 6 Apr 2011.
  13. ↵
    van der Wel MC. Timing is everything—response to comment of Myers [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/128#22078, 6 Apr 2011.
  14. ↵
    Wilkinson JE, Deis CE, Bowen DJ, Bokhour BG. ‘It’s easier said than done’: perspectives on mammography for women with intellectual disabilities. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):142–147.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Miller JL, Li M. “It’s easier said than done [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/142#22031, 25 Mar 2011.
  16. ↵
    Wilkinson JE, et al. Authors’ reply [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/142#22061, 30 Mar 2011.
  17. ↵
    Gruman J. Does my clinician trust me?...depends [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/148#22022, 25 Mar 2011.
  18. ↵
    Thom DH, Wong ST, Guzman D, et al. Physician trust in the patient: development and validation of a new measure. Ann Fam Med. 2011; 9(2):148–154.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Kramer RM. Investigating some further consequences of physician trust in patients using the new Thom et al. physician scale: a commentary [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/148#21986, 21 Mar 2011.
  20. ↵
    Rosser WW, Colwill JM, Kasperski J, Wilson L. Progress of Ontario’s family health team model: a patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):165–171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Herbert CP. FHT: an example of disruptive innovation [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/165#21981, 21 Mar 2011.
  22. ↵
    Jaén CR. It can be done and it works [eletter]. http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/9/2/165#21990, 21 Mar 2011.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (3)
Vol. 9, Issue 3
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Conversation Continues, as It Should
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Conversation Continues, as It Should
John J. Frey
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2011, 9 (3) 271-272; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1253

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Conversation Continues, as It Should
John J. Frey
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2011, 9 (3) 271-272; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1253
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Modifying the Measurement Paradigm or Questioning its Very Assumptions
  • On-the-Ground Wisdom About Care Integration
Show more On TRACK

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine