Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleTheory

Shared Mind: Communication, Decision Making, and Autonomy in Serious Illness

Ronald M. Epstein and Richard L. Street
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2011, 9 (5) 454-461; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1301
Ronald M. Epstein
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ronald_epstein@urmc.rochester.edu
Richard L. Street Jr
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Transactional Care and Interactional Care

    ComponentTransactional CareInteractional Care
    InformationInformation exchange
    Knowing about the patient
    Understanding the illness
    Information based on typical needs
    Focus on information provision
    More nformation is better
    Removing affective components of information
    Shared knowledge
    Knowing the patient-as-person
    Understanding illness-in-context
    Information tailored to individual need
    Focus on relevance, comprehension, and meaning
    Quantity of information depends on patient needs
    Acknowledging and adjusting for affective components of information
    DeliberationNegotiation
    Elicitation of preferences
    Negotiation and compromise
    Contractual relationship
    Removing affective influences
    Focus on quantification of risk
    Shared deliberation
    Mutual discovery of preferences
    Collaborative cognition
    Collaborative “medical friendship”
    Affective engagement
    Use of gut feelings and risk quantification
    DecisionIndividual choice
    Focus on individual autonomy
    Obtaining consent
    Delivering care
    Shared mind
    Focus on relational autonomy
    Articulating and confirming consensus
    Engaging in care

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Shared Mind: Communication, Decision Making, and Autonomy in Serious Illness

    Ronald M. Epstein , and colleagues

    Background Individuals often rely on others to help them make difficult medical decisions, especially when dealing with a serious illness. This article explores why, when, and how people involve trusted others in sharing information, deliberating, and decision making.

    What This Study Found The authors introduce the concept of "shared mind:" ways in which new ideas and perspectives can emerge when 2 or more people share thoughts, feelings, perceptions, meanings, and intentions. They explore how shared mind manifests in relationships and organizations, how it might be promoted through communication, and its implications for decision making and patient autonomy. The article also looks at a continuum of patient-centered approaches to patient-clinician interactions and proposes that autonomy and decision making consider not only the individual perspectives of patients, their families, and members of the health care team, but also the perspectives that emerge from the interactions between them.

    Implications

    • Shared mind, like caring, may be difficult to measure, but that should not diminish its importance
    • By being aware of shared mind, clinicians can note ways in which they and others can make helpful contributions to decision-making processes and enhance patient autonomy.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 9 (5)
Vol. 9, Issue 5
September/October 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Shared Mind: Communication, Decision Making, and Autonomy in Serious Illness
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Shared Mind: Communication, Decision Making, and Autonomy in Serious Illness
Ronald M. Epstein, Richard L. Street
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2011, 9 (5) 454-461; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1301

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Shared Mind: Communication, Decision Making, and Autonomy in Serious Illness
Ronald M. Epstein, Richard L. Street
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2011, 9 (5) 454-461; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1301
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • ARE TWO MINDS BETTER THAN ONE?
    • SHARED MIND
    • COMMUNICATION THAT PROMOTES SHARED MIND
    • INTERACTIONAL CARE AND RELATIONAL AUTONOMY
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Womens experiences and expectations of intimate partner abuse identification in healthcare settings: a qualitative evidence synthesis
  • How do GPs and patients share the responsibility for cancer safety netting follow-up actions? A qualitative interview study of GPs and patients in Oxfordshire, UK
  • Involvement of people with dementia in making decisions about their lives: a qualitative study that appraises shared decision-making concerning daycare
  • Palliative Care: A Core Competency for Stroke Neurologists
  • Predicting decline and survival in severe acute brain injury: the fourth trajectory
  • Doctors as a knowledge and intelligence building group: pragmatic principles underlying decision-making processes
  • Recognising the importance of 'family time-out' in consultations: an exploratory qualitative study
  • Treatment Decisions After Severe Stroke: Uncertainty and Biases
  • In This Issue: From Apprehension to Action
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unhurried Conversations in Health Care Are More Important Than Ever: Identifying Key Communication Practices for Careful and Kind Care
  • Refining Vendor-Defined Measures to Accurately Quantify EHR Workload Outside Time Scheduled With Patients
  • Curricular Interventions in Medical Schools: Maximizing Community Engagement Through Communities of Practice
Show more Theory

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Personalized care
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Ethics
    • Communication / decision making
    • Mindfulness and reflection

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine