Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1.
Characteristics of the Sample by Patient- Provider Racial and Ethnic Concordance (N = 358)
Variable Percent in Concordant Relationship n = 106 Percent in Discordant Relationship n = 252 Note: Percentages do not sum to 100% across rows, because they are the percentage of persons in concordant or discordant relationships with the particular characteristic. * P < .001 for the difference across concordant and discordant relationships. † P < .01 for the difference across concordant and discordant relationships. Race and ethnicity African American* 5.7 34.9 Asian and Pacific Islander* 56.6 11.1 Latino* 11.3 28.6 White 26.4 25.4 Demographics Age 9–11 years (vs 5–8 years) 42.5 44.1 Female 51.9 44.8 Excellent, very good health (vs good, fair, poor) 84.0 81.8 Public insurance coverage 7.6 10.7 Uninsured 4.7 7.1 Socioeconomic status Family Income (> $36,000) 82.1 75.8 Employment (employed) 61.3 67.9 Education (> high school)† 84.9 69.8 Health system factors Pediatrician (vs family practice) 41.5 38.9 Co-payments (vs none) 77.4 71.0 - Table 2.
Bivariate Patient-Provider Racial Concordance and Primary Care Experience by the Total Sample, Minority Status, and Racial and Ethnic Groups Separately (N = 358).
Primary Care Experience Concordant Mean (SD) Discordant Mean (SD) Δ * P < .01 for the difference in mean score for each racial or ethnic group compared to white across concordant and then discordant groups (eg, comparing accessibility scores for Asians in concordant relationships with whites in concordant relationships). † P < .05 for the difference in mean score for each racial or ethnic group compared to white across concordant and then discordant groups (eg, comparing accessibility scores for Asians in concordant relationships with whites in concordant relationships). ‡ P < .05 for the difference between racially concordant and discordant patient-provider relationships, within each racial and ethnic group. Total (n = 358) n = 106 n = 252 Accessibility 71.2 (12.4) 73.6 (12.4) −2.4 Utilization 70.5 (35.0) 64.5 (36.2) 6.0 Relationship 88.0 (21.9) 83.9 (24.1) 4.1 Services available 85.9 (10.8) 86.2 (10.9) −0.3 Services received 82.5 (13.4) 83.8 (12.4) −1.3 Total score 70.7 (23.5) 70.0 (25.0) 0.7 Minority (n = 266) n = 78 n = 188 Accessibility 70.9 (12.4) 73.4 (12.5) −2.5 Utilization 65.1 (36.1)* 62.2 (36.7) 2.9 Relationship 86.5 (22.3) 81.8 (25.1)* 5.3 Services available 85.1 (10.6) 84.9 (11.1)† 0.2 Services received 80.6 (14.5)* 83.2 (12.7) −2.6 Total score 67.9 (24.3)† 68.8 (25.4) −0.9 Asian and Pacific Islander (n = 88) n = 60 n = 28 Accessibility 69.7 (12.9) 71.5 (13.6) −1.8 Utilization 65.8 (34.7) 57.1 (35.3) 8.7 Relationship 87.9 (21.3) 81.3 (24.2) 6.6 Services available 84.6 (11.0) 84.5 (10.2) 0.1 Services received 78.6 (14.6)* 77.7 (16.2)† 0.9 Total score 65.4 (24.5) 67.9 (27.0) −2.5 African American (n = 94) n = 6 n = 88 Accessibility 77.1 (5.5) 74.5 (12.4) 2.6 Utilization 62.5 (37.9) 61.1 (37.3) 1.4 Relationship 91.7 (20.4) 82.6 (24.4) 9.1 Services available 85.1 (13.3) 84.9 (10.5)† 0.2 Services received 92.0 (8.8) 84.9 (11.7) 7.1 Total score 79.2 (28.7) 67.5 (26.2) 11.7 Latino (n = 84) n = 12 n = 72 Accessibility 73.8 (11.6) 72.7 (12.1) 1.1 Utilization 62.5 (44.6) 65.6 (36.7) −3.1 Relationship 77.1 (27.1) 80.6 (26.6) −3.5 Services available 87.2 (7.6) 85.2 (12.1) 2.0 Services received 84.7 (13.5) 83.2 (12.0) 1.5 Total score 75.0 (19.2) 70.8 (24.1) 4.2 White (n = 92) n = 28 n = 64 Accessibility 72.3 (12.4) 74.2 (12.3) 1.9 Utilization 85.7 (26.7) 71.1 (34.0) 14.6‡ Relationship 92.0 (20.5) 90.2 (19.7) 1.8 Services available 88.3 (11.2) 90.0 (9.8) −1.7 Services received 88.1 (7.8) 85.4 (11.4) 2.7 Total score 78.4 (19.8) 73.6 (23.6) 4.8 - Table 3.
Adjusted Patient-Provider Racial Concordance and Primary Care Experience by the Total Sample, Minority Status, and Racial and Ethnic Groups Separately (N = 358).
Primary Care Experience Concordant Mean (SD) Discordant Mean (SD) Δ * P < .01 for the difference in mean score for each racial or ethnic group compared to white across concordant and then discordant groups (eg, comparing accessibility scores for Asians in concordant relationships with whites in concordant relationships). † P < .05 for the difference in mean score for each racial or ethnic group compared to white across concordant and then discordant groups (eg, comparing accessibility scores for Asians in concordant relationships with whites in concordant relationships). Total (n = 358) n = 106 n = 252 Accessibility 71.2 (1.2) 73.5 (0.8) −2.3 Utilization 70.2 (3.4) 64.6 (2.2) 5.6 Affiliation 87.7 (2.3) 84.0 (1.5) 3.7 Relationship 85.9 (1.0) 86.3 (0.7) −0.4 Services available 82.4 (1.2) 83.8 (0.8) −1.4 Services received 70.5 (2.3) 70.1 (1.5) 0.4 Total score 78.0 (1.2) 77.1 (0.8) 0.9 Minority (n = 266) n = 78 n = 188 Accessibility 70.9 (1.4) 73.3 (0.9) −2.4 Utilization 65.0 (4.1)* 62.2 (2.6) 2.8 Affiliation 86.4 (2.8) 81.8 (1.8)† 4.6 Relationship 85.1 (1.2) 84.9 (0.8)* 0.2 Services available 80.5 (1.5) 83.2 (1.0) −2.7 Services received 68.1 (2.8) 68.7 (1.8) −0.6 Total score 76.0 (1.4)† 75.7 (0.9)* 0.3 Asian and Pacific Islander (n = 88) n = 60 n = 28 Accessibility 69.5 (1.7) 71.9 (2.5) −2.4 Utilization 66.2 (4.6) 56.3 (6.7) 9.9 Affiliation 87.8 (2.9) 81.6 (4.3) 6.2 Relationship 84.7 (1.3) 84.4 (1.9)† 0.3 Services available 78.4 (1.9)* 78.0 (2.8)† 0.4 Services received 64.8 (3.2) 69.2 (4.7) −4.4 Total score 75.2 (1.6) 73.6 (2.4) 1.6 African American (n = 94) n = 6 n = 88 Accessibility 76.3 (5.0) 74.6 (1.3) 1.7 Utilization 61.3 (15.3) 61.1 (4.0) 0.2 Affiliation 91.2 (9.9) 83.0 (2.6) 8.2 Relationship 84.2 (4.4) 84.9 (1.1) 0.7 Services available 91.6 (4.6) 84.9 (1.2) 6.7 Services received 74.7 (10.6) 67.8 (2.7) 6.9 Total score 79.9 (5.1) 76.1 (1.3) 3.8 Latino (n = 84) n = 12 n = 72 Accessibility 74.4 (3.7) 72.6 (1.4) 1.8 Utilization 66.9 (10.7) 64.9 (4.2) 2.0 Affiliation 77.5 (8.0) 80.5 (3.1) −3.0 Relationship 89.8 (3.2) 84.8 (1.3) 5.0 Services available 86.7 (3.7) 82.9 (1.4) 3.8 Services received 80.2 (6.7) 70.0 (2.6) 9.8 Total score 76.0 (1.4) 75.7 (0.9) 0.3 White (n = 92) n = 28 n = 64 Accessibility 72.7 (2.3) 74.0 (1.5) −1.3 Utilization 84.8 (6.2) 71.5 (4.0) 13.3 Affiliation 91.2 (3.8) 90.6 (2.5) 0.6 Relationship 88.3 (1.8) 90.0 (1.2) −1.7 Services available 88.7 (2.0) 85.2 (1.3) 3.5 Services received 77.9 (4.3) 73.8 (2.8) 4.1 Total score 83.9 (2.2) 80.9 (1.4) 3.0
Additional Files
Appendix A. Discussion of the Power of the Sample and Subsamples
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Appendix A. - PDF file, 1 page, 1.16 MB